An assessment of the acoustic survey technique, RoxAnn, as a means of mapping seabed habitat

RoxAnn acoustic surveys of the inner Moray Firth, undertaken in September/October 1995 and January 1996, were used to map seabed habitat on the basis of two sediment characteristics, “roughness” (E1) and “hardness” (E2). The traditional analytical method of fitting a “box pattern” to E1 vs. E2 scatter plots was compared with a more objective method using False Colour Composite Image (FCCI) and cluster analysis. Although both methods produced similar maps, the latter provided greater between survey consistency. Six to seven sediment types were indicated by RoxAnn, however ordination analysis of sediment samples indicated that some of the FCCI clusters could not be separated on the basis of their particle size distributions. This may have been due to a degree of depth sensitivity, but it is also possible that RoxAnn was responding to other physical or biotic seabed features other than just particle size. After combining RoxAnn FCCI clusters where ground-truthing grab samples had shown the particle size distributions to be similar, it was evident that RoxAnn could distinguish three main sediment habitats with certainty. On this basis, the RoxAnn derived maps compared well with maps obtained from British Geological Survey data. Finally we examined the distributions of four flatfish species to determine whether these were in any way related to the different sediment habitats identified by RoxAnn.

[1]  C. E. King,et al.  Habitat Selection by Flour Beetles in Complex Environments , 1973, Physiological Zoology.

[2]  Noel A Cressie,et al.  Statistics for Spatial Data. , 1992 .

[3]  F. Page,et al.  Associations between Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) and hydrographic variables: implications for the management of the 4VsW cod stock , 1996 .

[4]  Robert M. Zink,et al.  Bird species diversity , 1996, Nature.

[5]  Robert L. Folk,et al.  The Distinction between Grain Size and Mineral Composition in Sedimentary-Rock Nomenclature , 1954, The Journal of Geology.

[6]  E. Werner.  Species Packing and Niche Complementarity in Three Sunfishes , 1977, The American Naturalist.

[7]  A. Keast,et al.  Resource heterogeneity and fish species diversity in lakes , 1984 .

[8]  A. Rand.  Ecological Distribution in Anoline Lizards of Puerto Rico , 1964 .

[9]  Andrew M. Turner.  Freshwater snails alter habitat use in response to predation , 1996, Animal Behaviour.

[10]  D. Basford,et al.  The benthic environment of the North Sea (56° to 61°N) , 1988, Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.

[11]  Stephen J. Smith,et al.  Identifying Habitat Associations of Marine Fishes Using Survey Data: An Application to the Northwest Atlantic , 1994 .

[12]  W. Siu,et al.  Quantifying the impact of trawling on benthic habitat structure using high resolution acoustics and chaos theory. , 1996 .

[13]  S. Fretwell,et al.  On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds , 1969 .

[14]  K. R. Clarke,et al.  A Method Of Linking Multivariate Community Structure To Environmental Variables , 1993 .

[15]  P. Thompson,et al.  Winter Foraging by Common Seals (Phoca Vitulina) in Relation to Food Availability in the Inner Moray Firth, N.E. Scotland , 1991 .

[16]  R G Webster.  COMPETITION FOR RESOURCES FOR GOVERNMENT CAPITAL WORKS , 1980 .

[17]  G. Parker,et al.  Competition for resources , 1991 .

[18]  R. Macarthur,et al.  On Bird Species Diversity , 1961 .

[19]  K. R. Clarke,et al.  Comparing the severity of disturbance: a metaanalysis of marine macrobenthic community data , 1993 .

[20]  K. R. Clarke,et al.  Non‐parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure , 1993 .

[21]  S. Syrjala,et al.  A statistical test for a difference between the spatial distributions of two populations , 1996 .

[22]  R. Douglass.  Spatial Interactions and Microhabitat Selections of Two Locally Sympatric Voles, Microtus Montanus and Microtus Pennsylvanicus , 1976 .

[23]  C. Heip,et al.  Trends in biomass, density and diversity of North Sea macrofauna , 1992 .

[24]  S. Holbrook,et al.  THE COMBINED EFFECTS OF PREDATION RISK AND FOOD REWARD ON PATCH SELECTION , 1988 .

[25]  C. Catchpole.  HABITAT SELECTION AND BREEDING SUCCESS IN THE REED WARBLER (ACROCEPHALUS SCIRPACEUS) , 1974 .

[26]  B. H. Magorrian,et al.  An Acoustic Bottom Classification Survey of Strangford Lough, Northern Ireland , 1995, Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.

[27]  E. Simmonds,et al.  Which are better, random or systematic acoustic surveys? A simulation using North Sea herring as an example , 1996 .

[28]  A. Magurran,et al.  Biological diversity : the coexistence of species on changing landscapes , 1994 .

[29]  John S. Gray,et al.  The macrobenthos of the north sea , 1991 .

[30]  A. Houston,et al.  Patterns in the diving behaviour of the pochard, Aythya ferina: a test of an optimality model , 1994, Animal Behaviour.

[31]  M. Huston,et al.  Biological Diversity: The Co-existence of Species on Changing Landscapes. , 1997 .

[32]  S. C. Weeker.  HABITAT SELECTION. , 1964, Scientific American.

[33]  G.E.O. Schiagintweit.  Real-time acoustic bottom classification for hydrography a field evaluation of RoxAnn , 1993, Proceedings of OCEANS '93.

[34]  John A. Richards,et al.  Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis: An Introduction , 1999 .