Automatic detection of abnormalities in mammograms

BackgroundIn recent years, an increased interest has been seen in the area of medical image processing and, as a consequence, Computer Aided Diagnostic (CAD) systems. The basic purpose of CAD systems is to assist doctors in the process of diagnosis. CAD systems, however, are quite expensive, especially, in most of the developing countries. Our focus is on developing a low-cost CAD system. Today, most of the CAD systems regarding mammogram classification target automatic detection of calcification and abnormal mass. Calcification normally indicates an early symptom of breast cancer if it appears as a small size bright spot in a mammogram image.MethodsBased on the observation that calcification appears as small bright spots on a mammogram image, we propose a new scale-specific blob detection technique in which the scale is selected through supervised learning. By computing energy for each pixel at two different scales, a new feature “Ratio Energy” is introduced for efficient blob detection. Due to the imposed simplicity of the feature and post processing, the running time of our algorithm is linear with respect to image size.ResultsTwo major types of calcification, microcalcification and macrocalcification have been identified and highlighted by drawing a circular boundary outside the area that contains calcification. Results are quite visible and satisfactory, and the radiologists can easily view results through the final detected boundary.ConclusionsCAD systems are designed to help radiologists in verifying their diagnostics. A new way of identifying calcification is proposed based on the property that microcalcification is small in size and appears in clusters. Results are quite visible and encouraging, and can assist radiologists in early detection of breast cancer.

[1]  F V Gleeson,et al.  Cutting needle biopsy in the diagnosis of clinically suspected non-carcinomatous disease of the lung. , 2000, The British journal of radiology.

[2]  William R. Brody,et al.  Segmentation algorithms for detecting microcalcifications in mammograms , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[3]  Tony Lindeberg,et al.  Feature Detection with Automatic Scale Selection , 1998, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[4]  Nicolaos B. Karayiannis,et al.  Detection of microcalcifications in digital mammograms using wavelets , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[5]  Westone,et al.  Home Page , 2004, 2022 2nd International Conference on Intelligent Cybernetics Technology & Applications (ICICyTA).

[6]  Josef Kittler,et al.  Region growing: a new approach , 1998, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[7]  Artur Przelaskowski,et al.  Segmentation and feature extraction for reliable classification of microcalcifications in digital mammograms , 2003 .

[8]  H ARITHA,et al.  A Boundary Detection in Medical Images using Edge Following Algorithm Based on Intensity Gradient and Texture Gradient Features , 2015 .

[9]  L Costaridou,et al.  A digital density equalization technique to improve visualization of breast periphery in mammography. , 2000, The British journal of radiology.

[10]  Dimitrios I. Fotiadis,et al.  Improvement of microcalcification cluster detection in mammography utilizing image enhancement techniques , 2008, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[11]  Samir Kumar Bandyopadhyay,et al.  AUTOMATED DIGITAL MAMMOGRAM SEGMENTATION FOR DETECTION OF ABNORMAL MASSES USING BINARY HOMOGENEITY ENHANCEMENT ALGORITHM , 2011 .

[12]  Rekha Lakshmanan,et al.  Enhancement of microcalcification features in mammograms using zero-crossings of the Contourlet transform , 2011 .

[13]  Susan M. Astley,et al.  Detection of Mammographic Microcalcifications Using a Statistical Model , 1998, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[14]  C. Ozdoba,et al.  The radiology assistant , 2010, Clinical Neuroradiology.

[15]  Eliza Hashemi Aghjekandi Microcalcification Detection in Mammography using Wavelet Transform and Statistical Parameters , 2012 .