Prefrontal-cingulate activation during executive control: which comes first?

The Stroop test requires executive control functions, in particular inhibition of a learned routine (in this case, word reading). The spatiotemporal analysis of brain activation during Stroop task execution was performed in 16 healthy subjects using high-density event-related potentials (ERPs) and dipole source modeling (BESA software). Scalp ERP analysis revealed the neurophysiological substrate of the interference effect: first, a greater negativity in the incongruent as compared to the congruent and neutral conditions was found between 350 and 450 ms poststimulus over left frontocentral scalp regions. Source analysis of the difference wave (incongruent-congruent) indicated that a generator localized in left prefrontal cortex (PFC) contributed to this effect. Second, immediately after the first effect, a greater positivity in the incongruent as compared to the congruent and neutral conditions developed between 450 and 550 ms poststimulus over midline frontocentral scalp regions. A generator of this effect was located in right anterior cingulate cortex (ACC). ACC activation seems to follow the activation of PFC with some overlap between the two components. Possible interpretation of this finding is that PFC signals ACC when executive control is required and ACC implements the control.

[1]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[2]  M. Kiefer,et al.  Executive control is disturbed in schizophrenia: evidence from event-related potentials in a Go/NoGo task , 2000, Biological Psychiatry.

[3]  Arthur F. Kramer,et al.  fMRI Studies of Stroop Tasks Reveal Unique Roles of Anterior and Posterior Brain Systems in Attentional Selection , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[4]  T A Ketter,et al.  Blunted left cingulate activation in mood disorder subjects during a response interference task (the Stroop). , 1997, The Journal of neuropsychiatry and clinical neurosciences.

[5]  J. Dostrovsky,et al.  Human anterior cingulate cortex neurons modulated by attention-demanding tasks. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  N. Cohen,et al.  The relative involvement of anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex in attentional control depends on nature of conflict. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[7]  H. Mayberg,et al.  An ERP study of the temporal course of the Stroop color-word interference effect , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[8]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  The neural basis of human error processing: reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity. , 2002, Psychological review.

[9]  M. Scherg.  Fundamentals if dipole source potential analysis , 1990 .

[10]  M. Posner,et al.  Executive attention: Conflict, target detection, and cognitive control. , 1998 .

[11]  B. Kopell,et al.  The Stroop effect: brain potentials localize the source of interference. , 1981, Science.

[12]  John C Gore,et al.  An event-related functional MRI study comparing interference effects in the Simon and Stroop tasks. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[13]  M. Posner,et al.  Cognitive and emotional influences in anterior cingulate cortex , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[14]  Karl Velhagen,et al.  Tafeln zur Prüfung des Farbensinnes , 1985 .

[15]  A. Turken,et al.  Dissociation between conflict detection and error monitoring in the human anterior cingulate cortex , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  Jordan Grafman,et al.  Handbook of Neuropsychology , 1991 .

[17]  G. Schwartz,et al.  Consciousness and Self-Regulation , 1976 .

[18]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Investigations of the functional anatomy of attention using the stroop test , 1993, Neuropsychologia.

[19]  G. Lohmann,et al.  Color-Word Matching Stroop Task: Separating Interference and Response Conflict , 2001, NeuroImage.

[20]  T. Shallice,et al.  A Multidisciplinary Approach to Anterior Attentional Functions a , 1995, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[21]  B. Vogt,et al.  Contributions of anterior cingulate cortex to behaviour. , 1995, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[22]  P Videbech,et al.  PET measurements of brain glucose metabolism and blood flow in major depressive disorder: a critical review , 2000, Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica.

[23]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention, self-regulation and consciousness. , 1998, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[24]  John Polich,et al.  P300 and response time from a manual Stroop task , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[25]  Colin M. Macleod.  Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. , 1991, Psychological bulletin.

[26]  M. Botvinick,et al.  Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance. , 1998, Science.

[27]  J. Stroop.  Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. , 1992 .

[28]  A. Turken,et al.  Response selection in the human anterior cingulate cortex , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[29]  M. Raichle,et al.  The anterior cingulate cortex mediates processing selection in the Stroop attentional conflict paradigm. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  D. Price.  Psychological and neural mechanisms of the affective dimension of pain. , 2000, Science.

[31]  S. Rauch,et al.  The counting stroop: An interference task specialized for functional neuroimaging—validation study with functional MRI , 1998, Human brain mapping.

[32]  Markus Kiefer,et al.  Executive control deficit in depression: event-related potentials in a Go/Nogo task , 2003, Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging.

[33]  A. Anderson,et al.  An fMRI study of stroop word-color interference: evidence for cingulate subregions subserving multiple distributed attentional systems , 1999, Biological Psychiatry.

[34]  M. Scherg,et al.  Two bilateral sources of the late AEP as identified by a spatio-temporal dipole model. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[35]  Claude Alain,et al.  Neurophysiological evidence of error-monitoring deficits in patients with schizophrenia. , 2002, Cerebral cortex.

[36]  T. Paus,et al.  Regional differences in the effects of task difficulty and motor output on blood flow response in the human anterior cingulate cortex: a review of 107 PET activation studies , 1998, Neuroreport.

[37]  Michael I. Posner,et al.  Mapping the Cingulate Cortex in Response Selection and Monitoring , 1998, NeuroImage.

[38]  James L. McClelland,et al.  On the control of automatic processes: a parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. , 1990, Psychological review.

[39]  Marcus E. Raichle,et al.  Suppression of Regional Cerebral Blood during Emotional versus Higher Cognitive Implications for Interactions between Emotion and Cognition , 1998 .

[40]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Conflict monitoring versus selection-for-action in anterior cingulate cortex , 1999, Nature.

[41]  R. Parasuraman.  The attentive brain , 1998 .

[42]  B. J. Casey,et al.  Regional brain activity when selecting a response despite interference: An H2 15O PET study of the stroop and an emotional stroop , 1994, Human brain mapping.

[43]  J. Cohen,et al.  Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive control. , 2000, Science.

[44]  G R Marsh,et al.  Changes in event related potentials during processing of Stroop stimuli. , 1979, The International journal of neuroscience.

[45]  J. Dostrovsky,et al.  Pain-related neurons in the human cingulate cortex , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[46]  M. Bushnell,et al.  Pain affect encoded in human anterior cingulate but not somatosensory cortex. , 1997, Science.

[47]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Anterior cingulate gyrus dysfunction and selective attention deficits in schizophrenia: [15O]H2O PET study during single-trial Stroop task performance. , 1997, The American journal of psychiatry.

[48]  R. Knight,et al.  Prefrontal–cingulate interactions in action monitoring , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[49]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Attention to Action , 1986 .

[50]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Interference and Facilitation Effects during Selective Attention: An H2 15O PET Study of Stroop Task Performance , 1995, NeuroImage.

[51]  J. Duncan,et al.  Common regions of the human frontal lobe recruited by diverse cognitive demands , 2000, Trends in Neurosciences.

[52]  T. Paus,et al.  Functional connectivity of the anterior cingulate cortex within the human frontal lobe: a brain-mapping meta-analysis , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[53]  C Alain,et al.  Event-related neural activity associated with the Stroop task. , 1999, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[54]  G. Romani,et al.  Auditory evoked magnetic fields and electric potentials , 1990 .

[55]  R. Badgaiyan,et al.  Executive control, willed actions, and nonconscious processing , 2000, Human brain mapping.

[56]  M. Botvinick,et al.  Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. , 2001, Psychological review.

[57]  S. Kornblum,et al.  Isolation of Specific Interference Processing in the Stroop Task: PET Activation Studies , 1997, NeuroImage.

[58]  M. Botvinick,et al.  Parsing executive processes: strategic vs. evaluative functions of the anterior cingulate cortex. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[59]  J. Lannou,et al.  The Stroop's test evokes a negative brain potential, the N400. , 1997, The International journal of neuroscience.