Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Personality Coherence: Moderating Self-other Profile Agreement and Profile Consensus an Overview of Traditional Research on Moderator Variables

Traditional research on moderator variables in personality has focused on measures of relative consistency. In contrast, using Goldberg's (1992) adjectives representing the Big Five personality traits, the authors examined the applicability of moderator variables to measures of personality coherence. The authors considered 3 traditional moderator variables (interitem variability, construct similarity, and scalability) and one new moderator variable: the temporal stability of response patterns. Across 2 studies, individuals with temporally stable response patterns had higher levels of personality coherence, as measured by self-other profile agreement and informant profile consensus, than did individuals with less temporally stable patterns. By comparison, the normatively based moderator variables did not moderate self-other profile agreement and informant profile consensus. The implications for personality structure and coherence are discussed.

[1]  G Saucier,et al.  Hierarchical subcomponents of the Big Five personality factors: a cross-language replication. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[2]  Daniel Cervone,et al.  The Coherence of Personality: Social-Cognitive Bases of Consistency, Variability, and Organization , 1999 .

[3]  Daniel Cervone,et al.  Beyond Traits in the Study of Personality Coherence , 1999 .

[4]  W. Graziano,et al.  Unknown Words in Self-Reported Personality: Lethargic and Provincial in Texas , 1998 .

[5]  S. West,et al.  Moderators of self-other agreement: reconsidering temporal stability in personality. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  D. Funder,et al.  The Effect of Information on Consensus and Accuracy in Personality Judgment , 1998 .

[7]  D. Moskowitz,et al.  Dynamic stability of behavior: the rhythms of our interpersonal lives. , 1998, Journal of personality.

[8]  D. McAdams,et al.  A Conceptual History of Personality Psychology , 1997 .

[9]  J. S. Wiggins,et al.  Personality Structure: The Return of the Big Five , 1997 .

[10]  John A. Johnson,et al.  Handbook of personality psychology. , 1997 .

[11]  J. S. Wiggins,et al.  A dyadic-interactional perspective on the five-factor model. , 1996 .

[12]  W. Mischel Personality and Assessment , 1996 .

[13]  J. M. Digman,et al.  The curious history of the five-factor model. , 1996 .

[14]  W. Mischel,et al.  A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. , 1995, Psychological review.

[15]  W. Mischel,et al.  Intraindividual stability in the organization and patterning of behavior: incorporating psychological situations into the idiographic analysis of personality. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  Larry E. Toothaker,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions , 1991 .

[17]  S G West,et al.  Consensus, self-other agreement, and accuracy in personality judgment: an introduction. , 1993, Journal of personality.

[18]  C. R. Colvin,et al.  Childhood antecedents of young-adult judgability. , 1993, Journal of personality.

[19]  Y Shoda,et al.  The role of situational demands and cognitive competencies in behavior organization and personality coherence. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  T. Britt METATRAITS: EVIDENCE RELEVANT TO THE VALIDITY OF THE CONSTRUCT AND ITS IMPLICATIONS , 1993 .

[21]  Colvin Cr "Judgable" people: personality, behavior, and competing explanations. , 1993 .

[22]  David Magnusson,et al.  A Holistic View of Personality: A Model Revisited , 1993 .

[23]  "Judgable" people: personality, behavior, and competing explanations. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[24]  B W Pelham The idiographic nature of human personality: examples of the idiographic self-concept. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  B. Krahé,et al.  Personality and Social Psychology: Towards a Synthesis , 1992 .

[26]  L. A. Pervin Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research , 1992 .

[27]  R. E. Christal,et al.  Recurrent personality factors based on trait ratings. , 1992, Journal of personality.

[28]  L. R. Goldberg THE DEVELOPMENT OF MARKERS FOR THE BIG-FIVE FACTOR STRUCTURE , 1992 .

[29]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Consensus at zero acquaintance: replication, behavioral cues, and stability. , 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[30]  R. Baumeister On the Stability of Variability: Retest Reliability of Metatraits , 1991 .

[31]  R. Koestner,et al.  Uniqueness as a Moderator of Self-Peer Agreement , 1991 .

[32]  Richard J. Shavelson,et al.  Generalizability Theory: A Primer , 1991 .

[33]  W. Chaplin,et al.  The next generation of moderator research in personality psychology. , 1991, Journal of personality.

[34]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  A general model of consensus and accuracy in interpersonal perception. , 1991, Psychological review.

[35]  O. John The "Big Five" factor taxonomy: Dimensions of personality in the natural language and in questionnaires. , 1990 .

[36]  Frank J. Bernieri,et al.  To predict some of the people some of the time: In search of moderators. , 1989 .

[37]  D. Ozer,et al.  Patterns of personality consistency and change from childhood through adolescence. , 1989, Journal of personality.

[38]  Paul T. Costa,et al.  From catalog to classification: Murray's needs and the five-factor model. , 1988 .

[39]  K. Lanning Individual differences in scalability: An alternative conception of consistency for personality theory and measurement. , 1988 .

[40]  R. Koestner,et al.  To predict some of the people some of the time: A reexamination of the moderator variable approach in personality theory. , 1988 .

[41]  E. Diener,et al.  Situation selection as a moderator of response consistency and stability. , 1986 .

[42]  R. Larsen,et al.  Choice and avoidance of everyday situations and affect congruence: Two models of reciprocal interactionism. , 1986 .

[43]  Donald B. Rubin,et al.  Meta-Analytic Procedures for Combining Studies With Multiple Effect Sizes , 1986 .

[44]  J. S. Wiggins,et al.  Personality Assessment via Questionnaires , 1986 .

[45]  Peter Borkenau,et al.  The Trait Concept: Current Theoretical Considerations, Empirical Facts, and Implications for Personality Inventory Construction , 1986 .

[46]  D. Jackson,et al.  Idiographic measurement strategies for personality and prediction: Some unredeemed promissory notes , 1985 .

[47]  Mark Snyder,et al.  Personality and social behavior , 1985 .

[48]  L. R. Goldberg,et al.  A failure to replicate the Bem and Allen study of individual differences in cross-situational consistency. , 1984, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[49]  D. Bem,et al.  Constructing a theory of the triple typology: Some (second) thoughts on nomothetic and idiographic approaches to personality. , 1983, Journal of personality.

[50]  Jack Block,et al.  Lives Through Time , 1983 .

[51]  Personality and prediction: nomothetic and idiographic approaches. , 1983, Journal of personality.

[52]  J. Cheek Aggregation, moderator variables, and the validity of personality tests: A peer-rating study. , 1982 .

[53]  W. Mischel,et al.  Beyond déjà vu in the search for cross-situational consistency. , 1982 .

[54]  Douglas T. Kenrick,et al.  Personality traits and the eye of the beholder: Crossing some traditional philosophical boundaries in the search for consistency in all of the people. , 1980 .

[55]  Norman S. Endler,et al.  Interactional psychology and personality , 1976 .

[56]  Daryl J. Bem,et al.  ON PREDICTING SOME OF THE PEOPLE SOME OF THE TIME: THE SEARCH FOR CROSS-SITUATIONAL CONSISTENCIES IN BEHAVIOR , 1974 .

[57]  W. T. Norman,et al.  Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: replicated factors structure in peer nomination personality ratings. , 1963, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[58]  Gordon W. Allport,et al.  Pattern and growth in personality , 1961 .

[59]  G. Āllport Book Review: Becoming. Basic Considerations for a Psychology of Personality , 1955 .

[60]  L. Cronbach Processes affecting scores on understanding of others and assumed similarity. , 1955, Psychological bulletin.

[61]  D W FISKE,et al.  Intra-individual response variability. , 1955, Psychological bulletin.

[62]  L. Cronbach,et al.  Assessing similarity between profiles. , 1953, Psychological bulletin.

[63]  W. Stephenson Some observations on Q technique. , 1952, Psychological bulletin.

[64]  A. S. Levine Personality: A systematic theoretical and factual study. , 1952 .

[65]  D. W. Fiske Consistency of the factorial structures of personality ratings from different sour sources. , 1949, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[66]  G. Āllport Personality: A Psychological Interpretation , 1938 .

[67]  H. Hollingworth Personality a psychological interpretation. , 1938 .

[68]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .

[69]  J. B. Maller,et al.  Studies in the Nature of Character. , 1930 .

[70]  M. May,et al.  Studies in the nature of character, [part] 1: Studies in deceit: book 1, General methods and results; book 2, Statistical methods and results. , 1930 .