Segmentation using eigenvectors: a unifying view

Automatic grouping and segmentation of images remains a challenging problem in computer vision. Recently, a number of authors have demonstrated good performance on this task using methods that are based on eigenvectors of the affinity matrix. These approaches are extremely attractive in that they are based on simple eigendecomposition algorithms whose stability is well understood. Nevertheless, the use of eigendecompositions in the context of segmentation is far from well understood. In this paper we give a unified treatment of these algorithms, and show the close connections between them while highlighting their distinguishing features. We then prove results on eigenvectors of block matrices that allow us to analyze the performance of these algorithms in simple grouping settings. Finally, we use our analysis to motivate a variation on the existing methods that combines aspects from different eigenvector segmentation algorithms. We illustrate our analysis with results on real and synthetic images.

[1]  D. Rubin,et al.  Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper , 1977 .

[2]  Guy L. Scott,et al.  Feature grouping by 'relocalisation' of eigenvectors of the proximity matrix , 1990, BMVC.

[3]  C. W. Gear,et al.  Feature grouping in moving objects , 1994, Proceedings of 1994 IEEE Workshop on Motion of Non-rigid and Articulated Objects.

[4]  Takeo Kanade,et al.  A multi-body factorization method for motion analysis , 1995, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision.

[5]  Fan Chung,et al.  Spectral Graph Theory , 1996 .

[6]  Jitendra Malik,et al.  Normalized cuts and image segmentation , 1997, Proceedings of IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[7]  Pietro Perona,et al.  A Factorization Approach to Grouping , 1998, ECCV.

[8]  Kim L. Boyer,et al.  Quantitative Measures of Change Based on Feature Organization: Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors , 1998, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[9]  D. Jacobs,et al.  Class Representation and Image Retrieval with Non-Metric Distances , 1998 .

[10]  Daphna Weinshall,et al.  Condensing image databases when retrieval is based on non-metric distances , 1998, Sixth International Conference on Computer Vision (IEEE Cat. No.98CH36271).

[11]  Jitendra Malik,et al.  Self Inducing Relational Distance and Its Application to Image Segmentation , 1998, ECCV.