Simultaneous extracellular and intracellular quantification of EGFR using paired-agent imaging in an in ovo tumor model

Quantification of protein concentrations is often a static and tissue destructive technique. Paired-agent imaging (PAI) using matched targeted and untargeted agents has been established as a dynamic method for quantifying the extracellular domain of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in vivo in a variety of tumor lines. Here we extend the PAI model to simultaneously quantify the extracellular and intracellular regions of EGFR using novel cell membrane permeable fluorescent small molecules, TRITC-erlotinib (targeted) and BODIPY-N-erlotinib (non-binding control isoform) synthesized in house. An EGFR overexpressing squamous cell carcinoma cell xenograft tumor, A431, was implanted on the chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) of the embryonated chicken egg. In total six fluorescent molecules were administered and monitored over 1 h using multi-spectral imaging. EGFR concentrations were determined using both extracellular and intracellular PAI methods. The fluorescent molecules used for extracellular PAI were ABY-029, an anti- EGFR Affibody molecule conjugated to IRDye 800CW, and a Control Imaging Agent Affibody molecule conjugated to IRDye 680RD. The intracellular PAI (iPAI) fluorescent molecules were cell membrane penetrating TRITC-erlotinib, BODIPY-N-erlotinb, and BODIPY TR carboxylate, as well as cell membrane impermeant control agent, Alexa Fluor 647 carboxylate. Results from simultaneous imaging of both the extracellular and intracellular binding domains of EGFR indicate that concentrations of intracellular EGFR are higher than extracellular. This is anticipated as EGFR exists in two distinct populations in cells, cell membrane bound and internalized, activated protein. iPAI is a promising new method for quantifying intracellular proteins in a rapid tumor model on the chicken CAM.

[1]  Yu Chen,et al.  Organoid development in cancer genome discovery. , 2015, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[2]  Jonathan T. C. Liu,et al.  Quantitative in vivo cell-surface receptor imaging in oncology: kinetic modeling and paired-agent principles from nuclear medicine and optical imaging , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  Levi A Garraway,et al.  A Convergence-Based Framework for Cancer Drug Resistance. , 2018, Cancer cell.

[4]  Brian W. Pogue,et al.  Quantifying receptor density in vivo using a dual probe approach with fluorescence molecular imaging , 2011, Medical Imaging.

[5]  O. Mermut,et al.  Magnetic field effects on spectrally resolved lifetime of on-line oxygen monitoring using magneto-optic probes , 2009, BiOS.

[6]  T. Hasan,et al.  Advantages of a dual-tracer model over reference tissue models for binding potential measurement in tumors , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  J. Folkman,et al.  Vascularization of normal and neoplastic tissues grafted to the chick chorioallantois. Role of host and preexisting graft blood vessels. , 1975, The American journal of pathology.

[8]  Tayyaba Hasan,et al.  Microscopic lymph node tumor burden quantified by macroscopic dual-tracer molecular imaging , 2014, Nature Medicine.

[9]  H. Moses,et al.  Transforming growth factor beta 1-induced changes in cell migration, proliferation, and angiogenesis in the chicken chorioallantoic membrane , 1990, The Journal of cell biology.

[10]  G. Hannon,et al.  Patient-derived tumor xenografts: transforming clinical samples into mouse models. , 2013, Cancer research.

[11]  Tayyaba Hasan,et al.  Quantitative in vivo immunohistochemistry of epidermal growth factor receptor using a receptor concentration imaging approach. , 2014, Cancer research.

[12]  Jason R. Gunn,et al.  In Vivo Quantification of Tumor Receptor Binding Potential with Dual-Reporter Molecular Imaging , 2012, Molecular Imaging and Biology.

[13]  Viktor Hamburger,et al.  A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo , 1992, Journal of morphology.

[14]  Scott C Davis,et al.  Dual-tracer background subtraction approach for fluorescent molecular tomography , 2013, Journal of biomedical optics.

[15]  Patrycja Nowak-Sliwinska,et al.  The chicken chorioallantoic membrane model in biology, medicine and bioengineering , 2014, Angiogenesis.

[16]  J. Folkman,et al.  Avascular and vascular phases of tumour growth in the chick embryo. , 1977, British Journal of Cancer.

[17]  Manuel Hidalgo,et al.  Patient-derived xenograft models: an emerging platform for translational cancer research. , 2014, Cancer discovery.

[18]  Carl H. Snyderman,et al.  Angiogenesis Induced by Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Xenografts in the Chick Embryo Chorioallantoic Membrane Model , 1993, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[19]  Hayley E. Francies,et al.  What role could organoids play in the personalization of cancer treatment? , 2015, Pharmacogenomics.

[20]  T. Yap,et al.  Development of therapeutic combinations targeting major cancer signaling pathways. , 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[21]  Casey S. Greene,et al.  Genomic characterization of patient-derived xenograft models established from fine needle aspirate biopsies of a primary pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and from patient-matched metastatic sites , 2016, Oncotarget.

[22]  Aik Choon Tan,et al.  Patient-derived tumour xenografts as models for oncology drug development , 2012, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[23]  Ramesh Govindan,et al.  A dual-reporter fluorescent imaging approach can be used to estimate sentinel lymph node tumor burden , 2013, Photonics West - Biomedical Optics.

[24]  P. Burri,et al.  Vascular remodeling by intussusceptive angiogenesis , 2003, Cell and Tissue Research.

[25]  T. Hasan,et al.  Accounting for pharmacokinetic differences in dual-tracer receptor density imaging , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[26]  Tayyaba Hasan,et al.  Improved tumor contrast achieved by single time point dual-reporter fluorescence imaging. , 2012, Journal of biomedical optics.

[27]  A. Lammertsma,et al.  Simplified Reference Tissue Model for PET Receptor Studies , 1996, NeuroImage.

[28]  B. Wilson,et al.  Complete blood vessel occlusion in the chick chorioallantoic membrane using two-photon excitation photodynamic therapy: implications for treatment of wet age-related macular degeneration. , 2007, Journal of biomedical optics.

[29]  James P. Quigley,et al.  Chick embryo chorioallantoic membrane model systems to study and visualize human tumor cell metastasis , 2008, Histochemistry and Cell Biology.

[30]  P H Burri,et al.  Chorioallantoic membrane capillary bed: A useful target for studying angiogenesis and anti‐angiogenesis in vivo , 2001, The Anatomical record.

[31]  Sophie J Deharvengt,et al.  Dynamic dual-tracer MRI-guided fluorescence tomography to quantify receptor density in vivo , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  D. Mukhopadhyay,et al.  Pancreatic Cancer–Derived Exosomes Cause Paraneoplastic β-cell Dysfunction , 2014, Clinical Cancer Research.

[33]  F. Moussy,et al.  The chick chorioallantoic membrane as a novel in vivo model for the testing of biomaterials. , 2002, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[34]  Kimberley S Samkoe,et al.  Application of an ex ovo chicken chorioallantoic membrane model for two-photon excitation photodynamic therapy of age-related macular degeneration. , 2003, Journal of biomedical optics.

[35]  Sybill Patan,et al.  Vasculogenesis and Angiogenesis as Mechanisms of Vascular Network Formation, Growth and Remodeling , 2000, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[36]  Andreas Bikfalvi,et al.  Accessing key steps of human tumor progression in vivo by using an avian embryo model. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  D. Hedley,et al.  MicroPET/CT imaging of patient-derived pancreatic cancer xenografts implanted subcutaneously or orthotopically in NOD-scid mice using (64)Cu-NOTA-panitumumab F(ab')2 fragments. , 2015, Nuclear medicine and biology.

[38]  Robert Gurny,et al.  The chick embryo and its chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) for the in vivo evaluation of drug delivery systems. , 2007, Advanced drug delivery reviews.