Evolutionary Branching in a Finite Population: Deterministic Branching vs. Stochastic Branching

Adaptive dynamics formalism demonstrates that, in a constant environment, a continuous trait may first converge to a singular point followed by spontaneous transition from a unimodal trait distribution into a bimodal one, which is called “evolutionary branching.” Most previous analyses of evolutionary branching have been conducted in an infinitely large population. Here, we study the effect of stochasticity caused by the finiteness of the population size on evolutionary branching. By analyzing the dynamics of trait variance, we obtain the condition for evolutionary branching as the one under which trait variance explodes. Genetic drift reduces the trait variance and causes stochastic fluctuation. In a very small population, evolutionary branching does not occur. In larger populations, evolutionary branching may occur, but it occurs in two different manners: in deterministic branching, branching occurs quickly when the population reaches the singular point, while in stochastic branching, the population stays at singularity for a period before branching out. The conditions for these cases and the mean branching-out times are calculated in terms of population size, mutational effects, and selection intensity and are confirmed by direct computer simulations of the individual-based model.

[1]  C. Hauert,et al.  The Evolutionary Origin of Cooperators and Defectors , 2004, Science.

[2]  Y. Iwasa,et al.  Extinction risk of a density-dependent population estimated from a time series of population size. , 2000, Journal of theoretical biology.

[3]  William Feller,et al.  An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications , 1967 .

[4]  É. Kisdi,et al.  Dynamics of Adaptation and Evolutionary Branching , 1997 .

[5]  R. Ferrière,et al.  Unifying evolutionary dynamics: from individual stochastic processes to macroscopic models. , 2006, Theoretical population biology.

[6]  Yoh Iwasa,et al.  THE EVOLUTION OF COSTLY MATE PREFERENCES I. FISHER AND BIASED MUTATION , 1991, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[7]  B. Perthame,et al.  Evolution of species trait through resource competition , 2012, Journal of mathematical biology.

[8]  É. Kisdi,et al.  Evolutionarily singular strategies and the adaptive growth and branching of the evolutionary tree , 2004, Evolutionary Ecology.

[9]  L. Lehmann,et al.  Evolutionary and convergence stability for continuous phenotypes in finite populations derived from two-allele models. , 2012, Journal of theoretical biology.

[10]  Y. Iwasa,et al.  SEXUAL SELECTION CAN INCREASE THE EFFECT OF RANDOM GENETIC DRIFT—A QUANTITATIVE GENETIC MODEL OF POLYMORPHISM IN OOPHAGA PUMILIO, THE STRAWBERRY POISON‐DART FROG , 2010, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[11]  N. Barton,et al.  Natural and sexual selection on many loci. , 1991, Genetics.

[12]  T. Ohta,et al.  The Average Number of Generations until Fixation of a Mutant Gene in a Finite Population. , 1969, Genetics.

[13]  S. Karlin,et al.  A second course in stochastic processes , 1981 .

[14]  U. Dieckmann,et al.  On the origin of species by sympatric speciation , 1999, Nature.

[15]  U. Dieckmann,et al.  The Dynamical Theory of Coevolution : A Derivation from Stochastic Ecological Processes , 1996 .

[16]  J. Metz,et al.  Adaptive Dynamics: A Geometrical Study of the Consequences of Nearly Faithful Reproduction , 1995 .

[17]  J. Hammersley,et al.  Diffusion Processes and Related Topics in Biology , 1977 .

[18]  Motoo Kimura,et al.  Some Problems of Stochastic Processes in Genetics , 1957 .

[19]  Jens A. Andersson,et al.  Delayed evolutionary branching in small populations , 2007 .

[20]  U. Dieckmann,et al.  Oligomorphic dynamics for analyzing the quantitative genetics of adaptive speciation , 2011, Journal of mathematical biology.

[21]  S. Gavrilets,et al.  20 Questions on Adaptive Dynamics , 2005, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[22]  R. Lande Risks of Population Extinction from Demographic and Environmental Stochasticity and Random Catastrophes , 1993, The American Naturalist.

[23]  R. Lande NATURAL SELECTION AND RANDOM GENETIC DRIFT IN PHENOTYPIC EVOLUTION , 1976, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[24]  W. Feller,et al.  An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Application. , 1951 .

[25]  R. Nisbet,et al.  How should we define 'fitness' for general ecological scenarios? , 1992, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[26]  Y. Iwasa,et al.  THE EVOLUTION OF COSTLY MATE PREFERENCES II. THE “HANDICAP” PRINCIPLE , 1991, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[27]  R. Lande Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  Ulf Dieckmann,et al.  Evolutionary Branching and Sympatric Speciation Caused by Different Types of Ecological Interactions , 2000, The American Naturalist.