Liquid penetration length of heptamethylnonane and trimethylpentane under unsteady in-cylinder conditions

While strategies employing early or late direct-injection of fuel can improve emissions, they also can lead to impingement of liquid-phase fuel on the piston and/or cylinder wall due to low in-cylinder temperatures and densities during the injection event. Previous work has shown that liquid-phase fuel films formed in this way can lead to pronounced degradations in efficiency and emissions. To avoid these problems, a quantitative understanding of fuel-property effects on the liquid penetration length is needed, and this understanding must include conditions where in-cylinder thermodynamic conditions and the injection rate vary with time. This work reports liquid penetration lengths measured in an optical engine under such time-varying conditions. Diagnostics included laser light scattering for measurement of the liquid length and conventional pressure-data acquisition for heat-release analysis. Unsteady liquid penetration was characterized for different injection timings, injection pressures, intake-manifold pressures, and fuel volatilities to gain an understanding of the relative importance of these factors. Fuel volatility was studied by using two fuels, 2,2,4,4,6,8,8-heptamethylnonane (HMN) and 2,2,4-trimethylpentane (TMP), which have very different volatility characteristics. Measured liquid lengths changed as in-cylinder conditions changed, with increasing temperature and density during the compression stroke causing a decrease in liquid length, and decreasing temperature and density during the expansion stroke causing an increase in liquid length. Intake-manifold pressure and fuel volatility were found to be primary factors governing liquid length. Heat loss from the charge gas to the engine and local charge cooling due to fuel vaporization were found to have a secondary influence on liquid length. Injection pressure was found to have little effect.

[1]  Nikhil R. Pal,et al.  Image thresholding: Some new techniques , 1993, Signal Process..

[2]  José M. Desantes,et al.  Experimental Characterization of the Liquid Phase Penetration on Evaporating Diesel Sprays , 2005 .

[3]  M. Gavaises,et al.  Prediction of Liquid and Vapor Penetration of High Pressure Diesel Sprays , 2006 .

[4]  Yoshinaka Takeda,et al.  Emission Characteristics of Premixed Lean Diesel Combustion with Extremely Early Staged Fuel Injection , 1996 .

[5]  R. Rotondi.  Simulation of Liquid Phase Penetration in Diesel Spray , 2001 .

[6]  Raul Payri,et al.  Development and validation of a theoretical model for diesel spray penetration , 2006 .

[7]  Dennis L. Siebers,et al.  Liquid-Phase Fuel Penetration in Diesel Sprays , 1998 .

[8]  Christoph Espey,et al.  The effect of TDC temperature and density on the liquid-phase fuel penetration in a D.I. Diesel engine , 1995 .

[9]  Raul Payri,et al.  Diesel nozzle geometry influence on spray liquid-phase fuel penetration in evaporative conditions , 2008 .

[10]  Michael C. Drake,et al.  Piston Fuel Films as a Source of Smoke and Hydrocarbon Emissions from a Wall-Controlled Spark-Ignited Direct-Injection Engine , 2003 .

[11]  P. Senecal,et al.  Multi-Dimensional Modeling of Direct-Injection Diesel Spray Liquid Length and Flame Lift-off Length using CFD and Parallel Detailed Chemistry , 2003 .

[12]  Hirotaka Suzuki,et al.  Vaporization Characteristics and Liquid-Phase Penetration for Multi-Component Fuels , 2004 .

[13]  Takashi Suzuki,et al.  A NEW CONCEPT FOR LOW EMISSION DIESEL COMBUSTION , 1997 .

[14]  John E. Dec,et al.  Comparisons of diesel spray liquid penetration and vapor fuel distributions with in-cylinder optical measurements , 2000 .

[15]  Gilles Bruneaux,et al.  On the origin of Unburned Hydrocarbon Emissions in a Wall Guided, Low NOx Diesel Combustion System , 2007 .

[16]  M. Musculus,et al.  In-Cylinder and Exhaust Soot in Low-Temperature Combustion Using a Wide-Range of EGR in a Heavy-Duty Diesel Engine , 2007 .

[17]  Hiroshi Sono,et al.  PCCI Operation with Early Injection of Conventional Diesel Fuel , 2005 .

[18]  Rolf D. Reitz,et al.  Premixed diesel combustion analysis in a Heavy-Duty diesel engine , 2003 .

[19]  José M. Desantes,et al.  Evaporative diesel spray modeling , 2007 .

[20]  R. Danner,et al.  Physical And Thermodynamic Properties Of Pure Chemicals , 1991 .

[21]  J. Naber,et al.  Effects of Gas Density and Vaporization on Penetration and Dispersion of Diesel Sprays , 1996 .

[22]  R. M. Siewert.  A Phenomenological Engine Model for Direct Injection of Liquid Fuels, Spray Penetration, Vaporization, Ignition Delay, and Combustion , 2007 .

[23]  J. M. Pastor,et al.  A 1D model for the description of mixing-controlled inert diesel sprays , 2008 .

[24]  Rolf D. Reitz,et al.  In-Cylinder Measurement and Modeling of Liquid Fuel Spray Penetration in a Heavy-Duty Diesel Engine , 1997 .

[25]  Charles J. Mueller,et al.  Early Direct-Injection, Low-Temperature Combustion of Diesel Fuel in an Optical Engine Utilizing a 15-Hole, Dual-Row, Narrow-Included-Angle Nozzle , 2008 .

[26]  Rolf D. Reitz,et al.  Effects of Piston Bowl Geometry on Mixture Development and Late-Injection Low-Temperature Combustion in a Heavy-Duty Diesel Engine , 2008 .

[27]  Sankar K. Pal,et al.  A review on image segmentation techniques , 1993, Pattern Recognit..

[28]  W. S. Chiu,et al.  A TRANSIENT SPRAY MIXING MODEL FOR DIESEL COMBUSTION , 1976 .

[29]  M. McLinden,et al.  NIST Standard Reference Database 23: Reference Fluid Thermodynamic and Transport Properties-REFPROP, Version 8.0 , 2007 .

[30]  Rolf D. Reitz,et al.  A Study of the Effects of High EGR, High Equivalence Ratio, and Mixing Time on Emissions Levels in a Heavy-Duty Diesel Engine for PCCI Combustion , 2006 .

[31]  Yuji Ikeda,et al.  Investigation of the spray characteristics for a secondary fuel injection nozzle using a digital image processing method , 2007 .

[32]  J. C. Dent.  A basis for the comparison of various experimental methods for studying spray penetration. , 1971 .

[33]  J. Abraham,et al.  Conditions in which vaporizing fuel drops reach a critical state in a diesel engine , 1999 .

[34]  Robert L. McCormick,et al.  Compendium of Experimental Cetane Number Data , 2004 .

[35]  J. Abraham,et al.  A Computational Study of the Processes that Affect the Steady Liquid Penetration in Full-Cone Diesel Sprays , 2001 .

[36]  Long Zhang,et al.  Measurement of Liquid Phase Penetration of vaporating Spray in a DI Diesel Engine , 1997 .

[37]  Dennis L. Siebers,et al.  Scaling Liquid-Phase Fuel Penetration in Diesel Sprays Based on Mixing-Limited Vaporization , 1999 .

[38]  N. Henein,et al.  Direct Visualization of High Pressure Diesel Spray and Engine Combustion , 1999 .

[39]  A. Gallegos-Muñoz,et al.  Liquid penetration length in direct diesel fuel injection , 2008 .

[40]  Charles J. Mueller,et al.  An experimental investigation of in-cylinder processes under dual-injection conditions in a DI diesel engine , 2004 .

[41]  Ingemar Denbratt,et al.  Optical Studies of Spray Development and Combustion Characterization of Oxygenated and Fischer-Tropsch Fuels , 2008 .

[42]  Dennis N. Assanis,et al.  Evaluation of a Narrow Spray Cone Angle, Advanced Injection Timing Strategy to Achieve Partially Premixed Compression Ignition Combustion in a Diesel Engine , 2005 .

[43]  Dennis L. Siebers,et al.  Measurements of fuel effects on liquid-phase penetration in DI sprays , 1999 .

[44]  K. Varde,et al.  DIESEL FUEL SPRAY PENETRATION AT HIGH INJECTION PRESSURES , 1983 .

[45]  N. Hay,et al.  Comparison of the Various Correlations for Spray Penetration , 1972 .

[46]  Akihiko Minato,et al.  Investigation of premixed lean diesel combustion with ultra high pressure injection , 2005 .

[47]  Sanghoon Kook,et al.  Visualization of Diesel Spray Penetration Cool-Flame Ignition High-Temperature Combustion and Soot Formation Using High-Speed Imaging. , 2009 .

[48]  Paul C. Miles,et al.  The Influence of Charge Dilution and Injection Timing on Low-Temperature Diesel Combustion and Emissions , 2005 .

[49]  J V Pastor,et al.  Diesel spray image segmentation with a likelihood ratio test. , 2001, Applied optics.

[50]  Charles J. Mueller,et al.  Effects of Oxygenated Compounds on Combustion and Soot Evolution in a DI Diesel Engine:Broadband Natural Luminosity Imaging , 2002 .

[51]  F. J. Salvador,et al.  Prediction of Spray Penetration by Means of Spray Momentum Flux , 2006 .

[52]  Charles J. Mueller,et al.  Effects of Fuel Volatility on Early Direct-Injection, Low-Temperature Combustion in an Optical Diesel Engine , 2010 .

[53]  J. Dec,et al.  The Influence of Fuel Volatility on the Liquid-Phase Fuel Penetration in a Heavy-Duty D.I. Diesel Engine , 1998 .

[54]  Raul Payri,et al.  Experimental characterization of internal nozzle flow and diesel spray behavior. Part I: Nonevaporative conditions , 2005 .

[55]  Sanghoon Kook,et al.  Transient Liquid Penetration of Early-Injection Diesel Sprays. , 2009 .

[56]  Charles J. Mueller,et al.  Glow Plug Assisted Ignition and Combustion of Methanol in an Optical DI Diesel Engine , 2001 .

[57]  Rolf D. Reitz,et al.  Investigation of Mixing and Temperature Effects on HC/CO Emissions for Highly Dilute Low Temperature Combustion in a Light Duty Diesel Engine , 2007 .