Hardness, flexural strength, and flexural modulus comparisons of three differently cured denture base systems.

PURPOSE This study compared the surface hardness, flexural strength, and flexural modulus of a light- and heat-cured urethane dimethacrylate (UDMA) to two conventional polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) denture base resins. The effect of less-than-optimal processing condition on the hardness of internal and external surfaces of UDMA specimens was also investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS The materials tested were Eclipse (light- and heat-cured UDMA), Meliodent (heat-cured PMMA), and Probase Cold (auto-cured PMMA). Eclipse specimens were prepared by adapting the material onto the master cast and light curing in the processing unit for 10 minutes. Meliodent and Probase Cold specimens were prepared according to the manufacturers' instructions. Twenty rectangular specimens measuring 65 x 10 x 2.5 mm(3) were prepared for each material. They were stored in water at 37 degrees C for 30 days before testing. The surface hardness was measured using Vickers Hardness (VHN) test, and flexural strength and flexural modulus were measured using a 3-point bending test. Twenty-five additional Eclipse specimens were similarly prepared and were processed at various times of less than 20 minutes of curing. Vickers Hardness was determined on both the external and internal surfaces of specimens. Data were analyzed using a one-way ANOVA for comparisons of hardness, flexural strength, and flexural modulus between the three denture base materials and for hardness values of both the internal and external surface of Eclipse specimens with curing times. Post hoc analyses (Scheffé test) determined the difference between the groups. Student t-test was used for comparison of hardness between the external and internal surfaces of Eclipse specimens. RESULTS The hardness (VHN) values were 19.4 +/- 0.7, 17.0 +/- 0.4, and 16.0 +/- 0.4; the flexural strengths (MPa) were 103 +/- 4, 78 +/- 3, and 63 +/- 4; and the flexural moduli (MPa) were 2498 +/- 143, 1969 +/- 55, and 1832 +/- 89 for Eclipse, Meliodent, and Probase Cold materials, respectively. A comparison among the three polymers showed there were significant differences in surface hardness, flexural strength, and flexural modulus (p < 0.05). No significant difference in surface hardness (VHN) between the internal (19.1 +/- 0.6 to 19.4 +/- 0.7) and external surfaces (18.9 +/- 0.4 to 19.2 +/- 0.6) of irradiated Eclipse specimens was observed at 10-, 12-, and 14-minute polymerization times. CONCLUSION The surface hardness, flexural strength, and flexural modulus of light- and heat-cured UDMA (Eclipse) were significantly higher than the values obtained for heat-only cured (Meliodent) and auto-cured (Probase Cold) PMMA denture base systems.

[1]  Mehmet Mutlu,et al.  Modification of glass fibers to improve reinforcement: a plasma polymerization technique. , 2007, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[2]  Y. Grossmann,et al.  The use of a light-polymerized resin-based obturator for the treatment of the maxillofacial patient. , 2005, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[3]  P. Pfeiffer,et al.  Flexural strength and moduli of hypoallergenic denture base materials. , 2005, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[4]  M. Abu-Hassan,et al.  Some flexural properties of a nylon denture base polymer. , 2005, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[5]  N. Yunus,et al.  Some mechanical properties of a highly cross-linked, microwave-polymerized, injection-molded denture base polymer. , 2001, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[6]  P. Vallittu,et al.  Effect of 180-week water storage on the flexural properties of E-glass and silica fiber acrylic resin composite. , 1998, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[7]  P. Vallittu.  Flexural properties of acrylic resin polymers reinforced with unidirectional and woven glass fibers. , 1999, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[8]  P. Vallittu,et al.  Impact strength of a modified continuous glass fiber--poly(methyl methacrylate). , 1997, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[9]  P. Vallittu.  The effect of void space and polymerization time on transverse strength of acrylic-glass fibre composite. , 1995, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[10]  P. Vallittu,et al.  Impact strength of denture polymethyl methacrylate reinforced with continuous glass fibers or metal wire. , 1995, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[11]  M. Braden,et al.  Further observations on high impact strength denture-base materials. , 1992, Biomaterials.

[12]  R. Rodford.  Further development and evaluation of high impact strength denture base materials. , 1990, Journal of dentistry.

[13]  W. Murphy,et al.  Some physical and mechanical properties of a visible light-activated material. , 1988, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[14]  J. V. von Fraunhofer,et al.  The staining characteristics, transverse strength, and microhardness of a visible light-cured denture base material. , 1987, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[15]  R E Ogle,et al.  A new visible light-cured resin system applied to removable prosthodontics. , 1986, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[16]  J. McCabe,et al.  A method for measuring the wear of restorative materials in vitro , 1981, British Dental Journal.

[17]  W. Goebel,et al.  Reactions to acrylic resin dental prostheses. , 1980, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[18]  A. Harrison,et al.  The effect of a cross-linking agent on the abrasion resistance and impact strength of an acrylic resin denture base material. , 1978, Journal of dentistry.

[19]  Smith Dc,et al.  Polycarbonates. A preliminary report on the use of polycarbonates as a denture base material. , 1967 .

[20]  D. Smith,et al.  Polycarbonates. A preliminary report on the use of polycarbonates as a denture base material. , 1967, The Dental practitioner and dental record.