Minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer: A comparison between robotic, laparoscopic and open surgery

AIM To investigate the role of minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer and determine surgical, clinical, and oncological outcomes. METHODS This is a propensity score-matched case-control study, comparing three treatment arms: robotic gastrectomy (RG), laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG), open gastrectomy (OG). Data collection started after sharing a specific study protocol. Data were recorded through a tailored and protected web-based system. Primary outcomes: harvested lymph nodes, estimated blood loss, hospital stay, complications rate. Among the secondary outcomes, there are: operative time, R0 resections, POD of mobilization, POD of starting liquid diet and soft solid diet. The analysis includes the evaluation of type and grade of postoperative complications. Detailed information of anastomotic leakages is also provided. RESULTS The present analysis was carried out of 1026 gastrectomies. To guarantee homogenous distribution of cases, patients in the RG, LG and OG groups were 1:1:2 matched using a propensity score analysis with a caliper = 0.2. The successful matching resulted in a total sample of 604 patients (RG = 151; LG = 151; OG = 302). The three groups showed no differences in all baseline patients characteristics, type of surgery (P = 0.42) and stage of the disease (P = 0.16). Intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower in the LG (95.93 ± 119.22) and RG (117.91 ± 68.11) groups compared to the OG (127.26 ± 79.50, P = 0.002). The mean number of retrieved lymph nodes was similar between the RG (27.78 ± 11.45), LG (24.58 ± 13.56) and OG (25.82 ± 12.07) approach. A benefit in favor of the minimally invasive approaches was found in the length of hospital stay (P < 0.0001). A similar complications rate was found (P = 0.13). The leakage rate was not different (P = 0.78) between groups. CONCLUSION Laparoscopic and robotic surgery can be safely performed and proposed as possible alternative to open surgery. The main highlighted benefit is a faster postoperative functional recovery.

[1]  PhD Kay Washington MD.  7th Edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: Stomach , 2010, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[2]  Douglas G Altman,et al.  The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. , 2014, International journal of surgery.

[3]  胃癌研究会.  Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma , 1995 .

[4]  Jisun An,et al.  Major early complications following open, laparoscopic and robotic gastrectomy , 2012, The British journal of surgery.

[5]  Young-Woo Kim,et al.  Surgical stress after robot‐assisted distal gastrectomy and its economic implications , 2012, The British journal of surgery.

[6]  Yoon Young Choi,et al.  Robotic versus Laparoscopic versus Open Gastrectomy: A Meta-Analysis , 2013, Journal of gastric cancer.

[7]  D. Cunningham,et al.  Gastric cancer: ESMO-ESSO-ESTRO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. , 2014, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[8]  V. Goh,et al.  Anal cancer: ESMO-ESSO-ESTRO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. , 2014, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[9]  L. Casciola,et al.  Open vs robot‐assisted laparoscopic gastric resection with D2 lymph node dissection for adenocarcinoma: a case‐control study , 2011, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[10]  Min-Chan Kim,et al.  Robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: surgical techniques and clinical merits , 2010, Surgical Endoscopy.

[11]  S. Chiou,et al.  Initial Experience of Robotic Gastrectomy and Comparison with Open and Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer , 2012, Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.

[12]  T. Son,et al.  Robotic spleen-preserving total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: comparison with conventional laparoscopic procedure , 2014, Surgical Endoscopy.

[13]  M. Makuuchi,et al.  The Clavien-Dindo Classification of Surgical Complications: Five-Year Experience , 2009, Annals of surgery.

[14]  D. Cunningham,et al.  Gastric cancer: ESMO-ESSO-ESTRO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. , 2014, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[15]  Kay Washington,et al.  7th Edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: Stomach , 2010, Annals of surgical oncology.

[16]  S. Choi,et al.  Role of robotic gastrectomy using da Vinci system compared with laparoscopic gastrectomy: initial experience of 20 consecutive cases , 2009, Surgical Endoscopy.

[17]  S. Pocock,et al.  The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. , 2007, Preventive medicine.

[18]  Douglas G Altman,et al.  [The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology [STROBE] statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies]. , 2007, Gaceta sanitaria.

[19]  N. Nguyen,et al.  Current status of minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer: A literature review to highlight studies limits. , 2015, International journal of surgery.

[20]  Japanese Gastric Cancer Association.  Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3) , 2011, Gastric Cancer.

[21]  A. Parisi,et al.  Establishing a multi-institutional registry to compare the outcomes of robotic, laparoscopic, and open surgery for gastric cancer. , 2015, Surgery.

[22]  B. Kang,et al.  Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Robotic and Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: The Learning Curve of Robotic Surgery , 2012, Journal of gastric cancer.

[23]  S. Choi,et al.  Robotic gastrectomy as an oncologically sound alternative to laparoscopic resections for the treatment of early-stage gastric cancers. , 2011, Archives of surgery.

[24]  M. Kaminishi,et al.  Manipulation of the small intestine as a cause of the increased inflammatory response after open compared with laparoscopic surgery , 2006, The British journal of surgery.

[25]  Sang-Uk Han,et al.  Morbidity and Mortality of Laparoscopic Gastrectomy Versus Open Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: An Interim Report—A Phase III Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Trial (KLASS Trial) , 2010, Annals of surgery.

[26]  Y. Mok,et al.  Robot Versus Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Cancer by an Experienced Surgeon: Comparisons of Surgery, Complications, and Surgical Stress , 2013, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[27]  Soo-Jeong Cho,et al.  Comparison of surgical performance and short-term clinical outcomes between laparoscopic and robotic surgery in distal gastric cancer. , 2012, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[28]  M. Gonen,et al.  Laparoscopic Versus Open Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and High-Quality Nonrandomized Studies , 2012, Annals of surgery.

[29]  Yongliang Zhao,et al.  Robotic gastrectomy versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: comparison of surgical performance and short-term outcomes , 2014, Surgical Endoscopy.

[30]  Young-Woo Kim,et al.  Multicenter Prospective Comparative Study of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Adenocarcinoma. , 2016, Annals of surgery.

[31]  F. Cianchi,et al.  Robotic, laparoscopic and open surgery for gastric cancer compared on surgical, clinical and oncological outcomes: a multi-institutional chart review. A study protocol of the International study group on Minimally Invasive surgery for GASTRIc Cancer—IMIGASTRIC , 2015, BMJ Open.