The effect of selection on genealogies.

The coalescent process can describe the effects of selection at linked loci only if selection is so strong that genotype frequencies evolve deterministically. Here, we develop methods proposed by Kaplan, Darden, and Hudson to find the effects of weak selection. We show that the overall effect is given by an extension to Price's equation: the change in properties such as moments of coalescence times is equal to the covariance between those properties and the fitness of the sample of genes. The distribution of coalescence times differs substantially between allelic classes, even in the absence of selection. However, the average coalescence time between randomly chosen genes is insensitive to the current allele frequency and is affected significantly by purifying selection only if deleterious mutations are common and selection is strong (i.e., the product of population size and selection coefficient, Ns>3). Balancing selection increases mean coalescence times, but the effect becomes large only when mutation rates between allelic classes are low and when selection is extremely strong. Our analysis supports previous simulations that show that selection has surprisingly little effect on genealogies. Moreover, small fluctuations in allele frequency due to random drift can greatly reduce any such effects. This will make it difficult to detect the action of selection from neutral variation alone.

[1]  C. J-F,et al.  THE COALESCENT , 1980 .

[2]  J. Wakeley The coalescent in an island model of population subdivision with variation among demes. , 2001, Theoretical population biology.

[3]  B. Charlesworth,et al.  The effect of deleterious mutations on neutral molecular variation. , 1993, Genetics.

[4]  M Slatkin,et al.  Simulating genealogies of selected alleles in a population of variable size. , 2001, Genetical research.

[5]  P Joyce,et al.  Likelihoods and simulation methods for a class of nonneutral population genetics models. , 2001, Genetics.

[6]  Stephen M. Krone,et al.  The genealogy of samples in models with selection. , 1997, Genetics.

[7]  Stephen Wolfram,et al.  The Mathematica Book , 1996 .

[8]  P. Fearnhead Perfect simulation from population genetic models with selection. , 2001, Theoretical population biology.

[9]  N L Kaplan,et al.  The "hitchhiking effect" revisited. , 1989, Genetics.

[10]  S. Williamson,et al.  The genealogy of a sequence subject to purifying selection at multiple sites. , 2002, Molecular biology and evolution.

[11]  N L Kaplan,et al.  The coalescent process in models with selection. , 1988, Genetics.

[12]  G. B. Golding The Effect of Purifying Selection on Genealogies , 1997 .

[13]  W. G. Hill,et al.  The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection. , 1966, Genetical research.

[14]  C. Neuhauser The ancestral graph and gene genealogy under frequency-dependent selection. , 1999, Theoretical population biology.

[15]  M. Slatkin Gene genealogies within mutant allelic classes. , 1996, Genetics.

[16]  N L Kaplan,et al.  Deleterious background selection with recombination. , 1995, Genetics.

[17]  George R. Price,et al.  Selection and Covariance , 1970, Nature.

[18]  T. Nagylaki Gustave Malécot and the transition from classical to modern population genetics. , 1989, Genetics.

[19]  P. F. Slade Most recent common ancestor probability distributions in gene genealogies under selection. , 2000, Theoretical population biology.

[20]  A. Robertson A mathematical model of the culling process in dairy cattle , 1966 .

[21]  P. F. Slade Simulation of selected genealogies. , 2000, Theoretical population biology.

[22]  N. Barton,et al.  Extending the coalescent to multilocus systems: the case of balancing selection. , 2002, Genetical research.

[23]  Stephen M. Krone,et al.  Ancestral Processes with Selection , 1997, Theoretical population biology.

[24]  W. Dove,et al.  GUSTAVE MAL ~ COT AND THE TRANSITION FROM CLASSICAL TO MODERN POPULATION GENETICS , 2002 .

[25]  Peter Donnelly,et al.  Genealogical processes for Fleming-Viot models with selection and recombination , 1999 .

[26]  P. F. Slade Simulation of ‘hitch-hiking’ genealogies , 2001, Journal of mathematical biology.

[27]  R. Hudson Gene genealogies and the coalescent process. , 1990 .

[28]  Austin L. Hughes,et al.  Adaptive Evolution of Genes and Genomes , 2000 .

[29]  Peter Donnelly,et al.  Particle Representations for Measure-Valued Population Models , 1999 .

[30]  A. Brennicke,et al.  copia-, gypsy- and LINE-like retrotransposon fragments in the mitochondrial genome of Arabidopsis thaliana. , 1996, Genetics.

[31]  A. Caballero,et al.  Effective size of populations under selection. , 1995, Genetics.

[32]  R. Hudson,et al.  A numerical method for calculating moments of coalescent times in finite populations with selection , 1989, Journal of mathematical biology.

[33]  J. Wall,et al.  Genealogies and weak purifying selection. , 1999, Molecular biology and evolution.

[34]  Nicholas H. Barton,et al.  Speciation and the “shifting balance” in a continuous population , 1987 .

[35]  N L Kaplan,et al.  The coalescent process in models with selection and recombination. , 1988, Genetics.

[36]  G. McVean,et al.  The effects of Hill-Robertson interference between weakly selected mutations on patterns of molecular evolution and variation. , 2000, Genetics.

[37]  C. DeWitt-Morette,et al.  Techniques and Applications of Path Integration , 1981 .

[38]  Nicholas H. Barton,et al.  The effect of hitch-hiking on neutral genealogies , 1998 .