Meta-analysis of global left ventricular function comparing multidetector computed tomography with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

[1]  J. Kleijnen,et al.  Systematic review of the accuracy of dual-source cardiac CT for detection of arterial stenosis in difficult to image patient groups. , 2013, Radiology.

[2]  L. Køber,et al.  Automated assessment of heart chamber volumes and function in patients with previous myocardial infarction using multidetector computed tomography. , 2012, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[3]  T. Kristensen,et al.  Accuracy of multi-slice computed tomography for measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction compared with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2012, European journal of radiology.

[4]  A. Arbab-Zadeh,et al.  Assessment of coronary heart disease by CT angiography: Current and evolving applications , 2012, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.

[5]  H. Alkadhi,et al.  Meta-analysis: Diagnostic Performance of Low-Radiation-Dose Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography , 2011, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[6]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Assessment of global left ventricular function and volumes with 320-row multidetector computed tomography: A comparison with 2D-echocardiography , 2009, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[7]  S. Voros,et al.  Quantification of Left Ventricular Parameters Obtained by Automated Software for 64-Slice Multidetector Computed Tomography and Comparison with Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2009, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology.

[8]  Philipp Bruners,et al.  Functional imaging in the assessment of myocardial infarction: MR imaging vs. MDCT vs. SPECT. , 2009, European journal of radiology.

[9]  M. Budoff,et al.  Optimal phase for coronary interpretations and correlation of ejection fraction using late-diastole and end-diastole imaging in cardiac computed tomography angiography: implications for prospective triggering , 2009, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[10]  R. Günther,et al.  Left Ventricular Function Can Reliably be Assessed From Dual-Source CT Using ECG-Gated Tube Current Modulation , 2009, Investigative radiology.

[11]  Ammar Sarwar,et al.  Evaluating global and regional left ventricular function in patients with reperfused acute myocardial infarction by 64-slice multidetector CT: a comparison to magnetic resonance imaging. , 2009, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[12]  Zhi-gang Yang,et al.  Sixty-four-slice multidetector computed tomography for preoperative evaluation of left ventricular function and mass in patients with mitral regurgitation: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography , 2009, European Radiology.

[13]  M. Budoff,et al.  Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Indi , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  Yen-Wen Wu,et al.  Estimation of global and regional cardiac function using 64-slice computed tomography: a comparison study with echocardiography, gated-SPECT and cardiovascular magnetic resonance. , 2008, International journal of cardiology.

[15]  G. Hillis,et al.  64-Slice computed tomography angiography in the diagnosis and assessment of coronary artery disease: systematic review and meta-analysis , 2008, Heart.

[16]  Walter Heindel,et al.  Assessment of regional left ventricular function with multidetector-row computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging , 2007, European Radiology.

[17]  J. Barkhausen,et al.  Assessment of left ventricular function and mass in patients undergoing computed tomography (CT) coronary angiography using 64-detector-row CT: comparison to magnetic resonance imaging , 2007, Acta radiologica.

[18]  M. Oudkerk,et al.  Quantification of global left ventricular function: comparison of multidetector computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. a meta-analysis and review of the current literature , 2006, Acta radiologica.

[19]  B. Hamm,et al.  Evaluation of global and regional left ventricular function with 16-slice computed tomography, biplane cineventriculography, and two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[20]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Global and regional left ventricular function assessment with 16-detector row CT: comparison with echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance. , 2006, European journal of echocardiography : the journal of the Working Group on Echocardiography of the European Society of Cardiology.

[21]  Georg Mühlenbruch,et al.  Automated vs. manual assessment of left ventricular function in cardiac multidetector row computed tomography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging , 2006, European Radiology.

[22]  Beth McCarthy,et al.  Multi-detector row cardiac computed tomography accurately quantifies right and left ventricular size and function compared with cardiac magnetic resonance. , 2006, American heart journal.

[23]  C. Claussen,et al.  Assessment of left ventricular myocardial function using 16-slice multidetector-row computed tomography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography , 2006, European Radiology.

[24]  Peter Hunold,et al.  Assessment of left ventricular parameters using 16-MDCT and new software for endocardial and epicardial border delineation. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[25]  Masashi Komeda,et al.  Cardiac functional analysis with multi-detector row CT and segmental reconstruction algorithm: comparison with echocardiography, SPECT, and MR imaging. , 2005, Radiology.

[26]  R. Günther,et al.  Sixteen-slice spiral CT versus MR imaging for the assessment of left ventricular function in acute myocardial infarction , 2005, European Radiology.

[27]  A. Kopp,et al.  Bestimmung linksventrikulärer Funktionsparameter: Vergleich von 16-Zeilen-Mehrschicht-CT mit der MR-Tomographie , 2004 .

[28]  K. Koch,et al.  Möglichkeiten der 16-Schicht-CT bei der linksventrikulären Funktionsbestimmung: Beurteilung zweier unterschiedlicher Software-Tools zur quantitativen Funktionsanalyse sowie qualitative Bewertung von Wandbewegungsstörungen im Vergleich zur Magnetresonanztomographie , 2004 .

[29]  W. Heindel,et al.  Multi-detector row CT of left ventricular function with dedicated analysis software versus MR imaging: initial experience. , 2004, Radiology.

[30]  R. Günther,et al.  Quantitative and qualitative assessment of left ventricular volume with ECG-gated multislice spiral CT: value of different image reconstruction algorithms in comparison to MRI , 2003, Acta radiologica.

[31]  W. Heindel,et al.  Evaluation of Global Left Ventricular Myocardial Function with Electrocardiogram-Gated Multidetector Computed Tomography: Comparison with Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2003, Investigative radiology.

[32]  Richard D. White,et al.  Evaluation of left ventricular dysfunction using multiphasic reconstructions of coronary multi-slice computed tomography data in patients with chronic ischemic heart disease: validation against cine magnetic resonance imaging , 2003, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[33]  A. Bücker,et al.  Quantifizierung der Herzfunktion in der Mehrschicht Spiral CT mit retrospektivem EKG-Gating: Vergleich zur Kernspintomographie , 2003 .

[34]  K. Kreitner,et al.  [Multi-slice CT (MSCT) in cardiac function imaging: threshold-value-supported 3D volume reconstructions to determine the left ventricular ejection fraction in comparison to MRI]. , 2002, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[35]  I. Olkin,et al.  Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology - A proposal for reporting , 2000 .

[36]  K. Sim,et al.  Assessment of global and regional left ventricular function using 64-slice multislice computed tomography and 2D echocardiography: a comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance. , 2008, European journal of radiology.

[37]  Bernhard Gerber,et al.  Accurate estimation of global and regional cardiac function by retrospectively gated multidetector row computed tomography. Comparison with cine magnetic resonance imaging , 2007 .

[38]  山室 正樹,et al.  Cardiac functional analysis with multi-detector row CT and segmental reconstruction algorithm : comparison with echocardiography, SPECT and MR imaging , 2006 .

[39]  E. de la Pena-Almaguer,et al.  [Evaluation of left ventricular function with a 16-slice multidetector tomograph (MDCT-16): correlation with cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging]. , 2005, Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico.

[40]  C. Claussen,et al.  [Left ventricular functional parameters: comparison of 16-slice spiral CT with MRI]. , 2005, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[41]  K. Kreitner,et al.  [Assessment of global and regional left ventricular function with a 16-slice spiral-CT using two different software tools for quantitative functional analysis and qualitative evaluation of wall motion changes in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging]. , 2004, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[42]  R. Günther,et al.  [Quantification of cardiac function with multislice spiral CT using retrospective EKG-gating: comparison with MRI]. , 2003, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.