Differences in foot kinematics between young and older adults during walking.

Our understanding of age-related changes to foot function during walking has mainly been based on plantar pressure measurements, with little information on differences in foot kinematics between young and older adults. The purpose of this study was to investigate the differences in foot kinematics between young and older adults during walking using a multi-segment foot model. Joint kinematics of the foot and ankle for 20 young (mean age 23.2 years, standard deviation (SD) 3.0) and 20 older adults (mean age 73.2 years, SD 5.1) were quantified during walking with a 12 camera Vicon motion analysis system using a five segment kinematic model. Differences in kinematics were compared between older adults and young adults (preferred and slow walking speeds) using Student's t-tests or if indicated, Mann-Whitney U tests. Effect sizes (Cohen's d) for the differences were also computed. The older adults had a less plantarflexed calcaneus at toe-off (-9.6° vs. -16.1°, d = 1.0, p = <0.001), a smaller sagittal plane range of motion (ROM) of the midfoot (11.9° vs. 14.8°, d = 1.3, p = <0.001) and smaller coronal plane ROM of the metatarsus (3.2° vs. 4.3°, d = 1.1, p = 0.006) compared to the young adults. Walking speed did not influence these differences, as they remained present when groups walked at comparable speeds. The findings of this study indicate that independent of walking speed, older adults exhibit significant differences in foot kinematics compared to younger adults, characterised by less propulsion and reduced mobility of multiple foot segments.

[1]  Thomas P Andriacchi,et al.  The role of physical activity in changes in walking mechanics with age. , 2012, Gait & posture.

[2]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[3]  P A Rechnitzer,et al.  Age and sex effects on mobility of the human ankle. , 1992, Journal of gerontology.

[4]  L. Alcock,et al.  Alterations in gait speed and age do not fully explain the changes in gait mechanics associated with healthy older women. , 2013, Gait & posture.

[5]  D. Winter,et al.  Gait in the elderly , 1997 .

[6]  V. Chester,et al.  Multisegment Foot Kinematics During Walking in Younger and Older Adults , 2012, Journal of clinical medicine research.

[7]  A. Schultz,et al.  Effects of age on rapid ankle torque development. , 1996, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[8]  Richard W. Bohannon Comfortable and maximum walking speed of adults aged 20-79 years: reference values and determinants. , 1997, Age and ageing.

[9]  Hylton B Menz,et al.  Age-related differences in foot structure and function. , 2007, Gait & posture.

[10]  E S Grood,et al.  A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee. , 1983, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[11]  B. Nigg,et al.  Mechanical energy contribution of the metatarsophalangeal joint to running and sprinting. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  H. Menz,et al.  Two feet, or one person? Problems associated with statistical analysis of paired data in foot and ankle medicine , 2004 .

[13]  Alfred D. Grant Gait Analysis: Normal and Pathological Function , 2010 .

[14]  P. McNair,et al.  Effect of passive stretching and jogging on the series elastic muscle stiffness and range of motion of the ankle joint , 1996, British journal of sports medicine.

[15]  Gerald Harris,et al.  Quantitative characterization of gait kinematics in patients with hallux rigidus using the Milwaukee foot model , 2008, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[16]  T. Hortobágyi,et al.  Age causes a redistribution of joint torques and powers during gait. , 2000, Journal of applied physiology.

[17]  S. Holm A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure , 1979 .

[18]  R. Crompton,et al.  Kinematic correlates of walking cadence in the foot. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  D A Nawoczenski,et al.  Relationship between clinical measurements and motion of the first metatarsophalangeal joint during gait. , 1999, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[20]  Daniel Vélez Día,et al.  Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement , 2013 .

[21]  Suzanne G. Leveille,et al.  Lower extremity function and subsequent disability: consistency across studies, predictive models, and value of gait speed alone compared with the short physical performance battery. , 2000, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[22]  A. Leardini,et al.  Rear-foot, mid-foot and fore-foot motion during the stance phase of gait. , 2007, Gait & posture.

[23]  S. Mackintosh,et al.  Repeatability of stance phase kinematics from a multi-segment foot model in people aged 50 years and older. , 2013, Gait & posture.

[24]  J. Collins,et al.  Biomechanical gait alterations independent of speed in the healthy elderly: evidence for specific limiting impairments. , 1998, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[25]  T. Doherty Invited review: Aging and sarcopenia. , 2003, Journal of applied physiology.

[26]  Kinematic coupling relationships exist between non-adjacent segments of the foot and ankle of healthy subjects. , 2013, Gait & posture.

[27]  M. Whittle,et al.  Generation and attenuation of transient impulsive forces beneath the foot: a review. , 1999, Gait & posture.

[28]  J. Hamill,et al.  Relationship between selected static an dynamic lower extremity measures , 1989 .

[29]  David A. Winter,et al.  Human balance and posture control during standing and walking , 1995 .

[30]  S. Õunpuu,et al.  Step length reductions in advanced age: the role of ankle and hip kinetics. , 1996, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.