Distinguishing Social from Nonsocial Navigation in Moving Animal Groups

Many animals, such as migrating shoals of fish, navigate in groups. Knowing the mechanisms involved in animal navigation is important when it comes to explaining navigation accuracy, dispersal patterns, population and evolutionary dynamics, and consequently, the design of conservation strategies. When navigating toward a common target, animals could interact socially by sharing available information directly or indirectly, or each individual could navigate by itself and aggregations may not disperse because all animals are moving toward the same target. Here we present an analysis technique that uses individual movement trajectories to determine the extent to which individuals in navigating groups interact socially, given knowledge of their target. The basic idea of our approach is that the movement directions of individuals arise from a combination of responses to the environment and to other individuals. We estimate the relative importance of these responses, distinguishing between social and nonsocial interactions. We develop and test our method, using simulated groups, and we demonstrate its applicability to empirical data in a case study on groups of guppies moving toward shelter in a tank. Our approach is generic and can be extended to different scenarios of animal group movement.

[1]  Iain D. Couzin,et al.  Specialization and evolutionary branching within migratory populations , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  E A Codling,et al.  Group navigation and the "many-wrongs principle" in models of animal movement. , 2007, Ecology.

[3]  Simon Benhamou,et al.  Detecting an orientation component in animal paths when the preferred direction is individual-dependent. , 2006, Ecology.

[4]  Andrew M Simons,et al.  Many wrongs: the advantage of group navigation. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[5]  Pawel Romanczuk,et al.  Collective motion due to individual escape and pursuit response. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[6]  L. Dugatkin,et al.  Female mating preference for bold males in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  Leah Edelstein-Keshet,et al.  Inferring individual rules from collective behavior , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  I. Couzin,et al.  Collective memory and spatial sorting in animal groups. , 2002, Journal of theoretical biology.

[9]  C. Hemelrijk,et al.  Self-Organized Shape and Frontal Density of Fish Schools , 2008 .

[10]  I. Couzin,et al.  Inferring the structure and dynamics of interactions in schooling fish , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  J. Krause,et al.  Personality in the context of social networks , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[12]  J. L. Gould Animal navigation , 2004, Current Biology.

[13]  Iztok Lebar Bajec,et al.  Organized flight in birds , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[14]  Edward A. Codling,et al.  Navigation in human crowds; testing the many-wrongs principle , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[15]  T. Alerstam,et al.  Migration along orthodromic sun compass routes by arctic birds. , 2001, Science.

[16]  T. Vicsek,et al.  Hierarchical group dynamics in pigeon flocks , 2010, Nature.

[17]  J. Krause,et al.  Social organisation , 2022 .

[18]  G. Parisi,et al.  Interaction ruling animal collective behavior depends on topological rather than metric distance: Evidence from a field study , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Nikolaus Correll,et al.  SwisTrack: A Tracking Tool for Multi-Unit Robotic and Biological Systems , 2006, 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[20]  Leonard J. Gray,et al.  Three Dimensional Analysis , 2008 .

[21]  Martin Nilsson Jacobi,et al.  Determining interaction rules in animal swarms , 2010 .

[22]  J. Krause,et al.  Sex matters: a social context to boldness in guppies (Poecilia reticulata) , 2010 .

[23]  I. Couzin,et al.  Social interactions, information use, and the evolution of collective migration , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  I. Couzin,et al.  Effective leadership and decision-making in animal groups on the move , 2005, Nature.

[25]  R. R. Krausz Living in Groups , 2013 .

[26]  Richard James,et al.  Behavioural trait assortment in a social network: patterns and implications , 2009, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[27]  Joseph J. Hale,et al.  From Disorder to Order in Marching Locusts , 2006, Science.

[28]  Edward A. Codling,et al.  Random walk models for the movement and recruitment of reef fish larvae , 2004 .

[29]  Giorgio Parisi,et al.  The STARFLAG handbook on collective animal behaviour: 2. Three-dimensional analysis , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[30]  I. Couzin,et al.  “Leading According to Need” in Self‐Organizing Groups , 2009, The American Naturalist.

[31]  Jens Krause,et al.  How perceived threat increases synchronization in collectively moving animal groups , 2010, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[32]  Craig W. Reynolds Flocks, herds, and schools: a distributed behavioral model , 1987, SIGGRAPH.

[33]  D. Grünbaum Schooling as a strategy for taxis in a noisy environment , 1998, Evolutionary Ecology.

[34]  V. Urios,et al.  Extremely detoured migration in an inexperienced bird: interplay of transport costs and social interactions , 2011 .

[35]  G. Parisi,et al.  Scale-free correlations in starling flocks , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.