Visual, vestibular and voluntary contributions to human head stabilization

SummaryWe have investigated the ability of humans to stabilize their heads in space and assessed the influence of mental set and the relative importance of visual and vestibular cues. Ten normal subjects and 3 patients with bilateral vestibular loss were studied. Subjects were fixed firmly to the chair of a turntable facing a screen on which was projected a target spot. A ‘gunsight’ spot generated by a small projector fixed to the head provided feedback of head position. Four conditions were studied (1) Gunsight (GU): subjects were instructed to stabilize the head in space by superimposing the ‘gunsight’ spot on the fixed target spot while chair position was displaced according to a random pattern with a bandwidth from 0–1 Hz. (2) Imagined gunsight (IGU): identical to condition 1 except that the subject was blindfolded and so had to imagine the target position. (3) Mental arithmetic (MA): subjects did mental arithmetic while the chair was displaced. (4) Visual tracking (VT): subjects were instructed to track the target spot with the ‘gunsight’ spot while the chair was fixed and the target spot driven to follow the chair displacement trajectory used in conditions 1, 2 and 3. In GU normal subjects stabilized their head position extremely well (mean HEAD/CHAIR gain = 0.81). Significant stabilization was present in IGU although the gain (mean gain = 0.61) was reduced compared to GU. There was very little stabilization in MA (mean gain = 0.12). In VT, subjects tracked the target with about the same gain (mean gain = 0.68) as in IGU. By comparison, the vestibular patients could not perform IGU, for which their performance (mean gain = 0.08) was similar to MA (mean gain = 0.06). In GU (mean gain = 0.54), their performance was attributable to visual tracking (mean gain in VT = 0.50). For the frequency bandwidth in which subjects were tested, the results show that: (1) When subjects were distracted by mental arithmetic, the contribution to head stability of the short latency cervico-collic (CCR) and vestibulocollic (VCR) reflexes is negligible. (2) As expected, vision plays an important role in stabilizing the head. (3) Equally important are long latency stabilizing mechanisms whose onset times (140 ms) are shorter, but still comparable to that of vision. (4) The latter mechanisms are of vestibular origin and their influence is under voluntary control so as to permit augmenting head stability compared to what it would be if vision acted alone.

[1]  J. W. Wolfe,et al.  Application of linear system analysis to the horizontal vestibulo-ocular reflex of the alert rhesus monkey using pseudorandom binary sequence and single frequency sinusoidal stimulation , 1979, Biological Cybernetics.

[2]  Terry A. Bahill,et al.  Smooth pursuit eye movements in response to unpredictable target waveforms , 1980, Vision Research.

[3]  R. Carpenter,et al.  Movements of the Eyes , 1978 .

[4]  R D Yee,et al.  Voluntary control of the human vestibulo-ocular reflex. , 1984, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[5]  A. Fuchs,et al.  Relationship between eye acceleration and retinal image velocity during foveal smooth pursuit in man and monkey. , 1981, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  B W Peterson,et al.  Cervicocollic reflex: its dynamic properties and interaction with vestibular reflexes. , 1985, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  B. Peterson,et al.  Role of Vestibular and Neck Reflexes in Controlling Eye and Head Position , 1982 .

[8]  V. J. Wilson,et al.  DYNAMICS OF VESTIBULO‐OCULAR, VESTIBULO‐COLLIC, AND CERVICOCOLLIC REFLEXES * , 1981, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[9]  L. Stark,et al.  Simulation of head movement trajectories: model and fit to main sequence , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[10]  B. Peterson,et al.  Spatial and temporal response properties of the vestibulocollic reflex in decerebrate cats. , 1985, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  H. Galiana,et al.  Bechterew's phenomenon in humans. A new explanation. , 1984, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[12]  L. Stark,et al.  Sensitivity analysis and optimization for a head movement model , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[13]  A. Berthoz,et al.  Dynamics of the head-neck system in response to small perturbations: Analysis and modeling in the frequency domain , 1975, Biological Cybernetics.

[14]  J A Michael,et al.  Dependence of visual tracking capability upon stimulus predictability. , 1966, Vision research.

[15]  I. Hunter,et al.  Two-sided linear filter identification , 1983, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[16]  F A Miles,et al.  Short-latency ocular following responses of monkey. II. Dependence on a prior saccadic eye movement. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Effect of load disturbances during centrally initiated movements. , 1978, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  Ruth Maulucci,et al.  Visually triggered eye-arm movements in man , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  Daniel H. Ashmead,et al.  The coordination of eye and head movements during early infancy: A selective review , 1983, Behavioural Brain Research.

[20]  B. Peterson,et al.  Voluntary modulation of the vestibuloocular reflex in humans and its relation to smooth pursuit , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[21]  I W Hunter,et al.  NEXUS: a computer language for physiological systems and signal analysis. , 1984, Computers in biology and medicine.

[22]  J. Outerbridge,et al.  Reflex vestibular control of head movement in man. , 1971, Aerospace medicine.

[23]  E Bizzi,et al.  The coordination of eye-head movements. , 1974, Scientific American.

[24]  Y. Uchino,et al.  Frequency-response analysis of vestibular-induced neck reflex in cat. II. Functional significance of cervical afferents and polysynaptic descending pathways. , 1978, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  G. M. Jones,et al.  A theoretical and comparative study of the functional dependence of the semicircular canal upon its physical dimensions , 1963, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[26]  V. J. Wilson,et al.  Mammalian Vestibular Physiology , 1979, Springer US.

[27]  S. Yasui,et al.  Perceived visual motion as effective stimulus to pursuit eye movement system , 1975, Science.

[28]  F. A. Miles,et al.  Short-latency ocular following responses of monkey. I. Dependence on temporospatial properties of visual input. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[29]  T. Mergner,et al.  The role of canal-neck interaction for the perception of horizontal trunk and head rotation , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[30]  Duane T. McRuer,et al.  Human dynamics in man-machine systems , 1980, Autom..

[31]  D. Robinson,et al.  The vestibulo‐ocular reflex during human saccadic eye movements. , 1986, The Journal of physiology.

[32]  A. Berthoz,et al.  Adaptive modification of the vestibulo-ocular reflex by mental effort in darkness , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[33]  Vasilis Z. Marmarelis,et al.  Analysis of Physiological Systems , 1978, Computers in Biology and Medicine.

[34]  V. J. Wilson,et al.  Dynamic properties of vestibular reflexes in the decerebrate cat , 1982, Experimental Brain Research.

[35]  A. Berthoz,et al.  Difference between eye closure and visual stabilization in the control of posture in man. , 1982, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[36]  F. Richmond,et al.  What are the proprioceptors of the neck? , 1979, Progress in brain research.

[37]  G. Barnes Vestibulo‐ocular function during co‐ordinated head and eye movements to acquire visual targets. , 1979, The Journal of physiology.

[38]  D. Robinson,et al.  Voluntary, non-visual control of the human vestibulo-ocular reflex. , 1976, Acta oto-laryngologica.