DIY networking as a facilitator for interdisciplinary research on the hybrid city

DIY networking is a technology with special characteristics compared to the public Internet, which holds a unique potential for empowering citizens to shape their hybrid urban space toward conviviality and collective awareness. It can also play the role of a “boundary object” for facilitating interdisciplinary interactions and participatory processes between different actors: researchers, engineers, practitioners, artists, designers, local authorities, and activists. This position paper presents a social learning framework, the DIY networking paradigm, that we aim to put in the centre of the hybrid space design process. We first introduce our individual views on the role of design as discussed in the fields of engineering, urban planning, urban interaction design, design research, and community informatics. We then introduce a simple methodology for combining these diverse perspectives into a meaningful interdisciplinary collaboration, through a series of related events with different structure and framing. We conclude with a short summary of a selection of these events, which serves also as an introduction to the CONTACT workshop on facilitating information sharing between strangers, in the context of the Hybrid City III conference.

[1]  Oren Shlomo,et al.  Cities for People not for Profit: Critical Urban Theory and the Right to the City, edited by Neil Brenner, Peter Marcuse and Margit Mayer. London: Routledge, 2011. , 2016 .

[2]  Mark Gaved,et al.  Using ICT to support public and private community memories: case studies and lessons learned , 2006 .

[3]  Anthony Dunne,et al.  Hertzian Tales: Electronic Products, Aesthetic Experience, and Critical Design , 1999 .

[4]  P. Healey Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies , 1997 .

[5]  Ileana Apostol,et al.  The Right(s) to the Hybrid City and the Role of DIY Networking , 2014, J. Community Informatics.

[6]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[7]  Changhyun Kim Cities for people, not for profit : critical urban theory and the right to the city , 2012 .

[8]  Mark Gaved,et al.  Pioneers, subcultures and cooperatives: The grassroots augmentation of urban places , 2008 .

[9]  N. Oudshoorn,et al.  From Innovation Community to Community Innovation , 2009 .

[10]  M. Gaved,et al.  An Investigation Into Grassroots Initiated Networked Communities As A Means Of Addressing The Digital Divide , 2011 .

[11]  Jason Farman,et al.  Mobile Interface Theory: Embodied Space and Locative Media , 2020 .

[12]  Zeynep Tufekci,et al.  Engineering the public: Big data, surveillance and computational politics , 2014, First Monday.

[13]  Patsy Healey,et al.  The deliberative practitioner: Encouraging participatory planning processes. , 2001 .

[14]  Rens Scheepers,et al.  Managing the crises in intranet implementation: a stage model , 2000, Inf. Syst. J..

[15]  Alison Powell,et al.  Metaphors, models and communicative spaces: designing local wireless infrastructure , 2011 .

[16]  Hans Ulrich Obrist,et al.  Design as Curator for Urban Discourses , 2014 .

[17]  Tobie Kerridge,et al.  Anatomy of a failure: how we knew when our design went wrong, and what we learned from it , 2009, CHI.

[18]  Douglas Schuler,et al.  Participatory Design: Principles and Practices , 1993 .

[19]  C. Pohl,et al.  Handbook of transdisciplinary research , 2008 .

[20]  Laura Forlano,et al.  Anytime? Anywhere?: Reframing Debates Around Municipal Wireless Networking , 2008 .

[21]  Michael Smyth,et al.  Tangible possibilities—envisioning interactions in public space , 2013, Digit. Creativity.

[22]  M. Gibbs,et al.  Intranets and local community: 'yes, an intranet is all very well, but do we still get free beer and a barbeque?' , 2003 .

[23]  D. Harvey The right to the city , 2003 .

[24]  Jörg Ott,et al.  Do It Yourself networking: an interdisciplinary approach (Dagstuhl Seminar 14042) , 2014 .

[25]  Katrina Jungnickel,et al.  DiY WiFi - Re-imagining Connectivity , 2014 .

[26]  Simon Sheikh The Production of Space , 1996 .

[27]  Evgeny Morozov,et al.  Book review: To save everything click here: the folly of technological solutionism , 2013 .

[28]  David D. Clark,et al.  Tussle in cyberspace: defining tomorrow's Internet , 2002, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[29]  Anna Kuchment,et al.  To save everything click here: The folly of technological solutionism. , 2013 .

[30]  S. Arnstein,et al.  Ladder of Citizen Participation , 2020 .

[31]  Henri Lefebvre The Right to the City , 2012 .

[32]  Wolfgang Jonas,et al.  Research through DESIGN through research - a problem statement and a conceptual sketch , 2006 .

[33]  Gesche Joost,et al.  Design and Social Change: The Changing Environment of a Discipline in Flux , 2015 .

[34]  Michael Smyth,et al.  UrbanixD: designing human interactions in the networked city , 2013, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[35]  P. Antoniadis,et al.  Community Building over Neighborhood Wireless Mesh Networks , 2008, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine.