Interaction techniques for users with severe motor impairment

This chapter presents brief overview of a few new technologies used in interfaces for people with different range of abilities. We discuss about scanning systems that enables one to use a computer or tablet using only one or two switches, eye tracking system that moves a pointer in a screen following eye gaze and finally EEG-based brain computer interfaces. The chapter discusses state of the art on each system, points to a new system by combining more than one modality and finally present existing problems and future vision regarding these technologies.

[1]  Roope Raisamo,et al.  Optimizing Menu Selection Process for Single-Switch Manipulation , 2004, ICCHP.

[2]  Patrick Langdon,et al.  A new input system for disabled users involving eye gaze tracker and scanning interface , 2011 .

[3]  H H Koester,et al.  Adaptive one-switch row-column scanning. , 1999, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[4]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Brain-Computer Interfaces for Communication and Control. , 2011, Communications of the ACM.

[5]  G. Fullerton Psychology and physiology. , 1896 .

[6]  T. Ross Fuzzy Logic with Engineering Applications , 1994 .

[7]  Shumin Zhai,et al.  Manual and gaze input cascaded (MAGIC) pointing , 1999, CHI '99.

[8]  Dennis Proffitt,et al.  Exploring Calibration Techniques for Functional Near-Infrared Imaging (fNIR) Controlled Brain-Computer Interfaces , 2007, HCI.

[9]  Mark Hawley,et al.  Evaluation of scanning user interfaces using real-time-data usage logs , 2000, Assets '00.

[10]  S. Gielen,et al.  The brain–computer interface cycle , 2009, Journal of neural engineering.

[11]  Constantine Stephanidis,et al.  FastScanner: An Accessibility Tool for Motor Impaired Users , 2004, ICCHP.

[12]  J. A. Wilson,et al.  Electrocorticographically controlled brain-computer interfaces using motor and sensory imagery in patients with temporary subdural electrode implants. Report of four cases. , 2007, Journal of neurosurgery.

[13]  D J McFarland,et al.  An EEG-based brain-computer interface for cursor control. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[14]  G. Fraser Shein Towards task transparency in alternative computer access, selection of text through switch-based scanning , 1997 .

[15]  G Pfurtscheller,et al.  Current trends in Graz Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) research. , 2000, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[16]  J. A. Elshout Review of Brain-Computer Interfaces based on the P300 evoked potential , 2009 .

[17]  Wolfgang Rosenstiel,et al.  An MEG-based brain–computer interface (BCI) , 2007, NeuroImage.

[18]  D. Dowsett,et al.  Physics of diagnostic imaging , 1998 .

[19]  J. Wolpaw,et al.  Textbook of Neural Repair and Rehabilitation: Brain–computer interfaces for communication and control , 2006 .

[20]  Peter Robinson,et al.  The cluster scanning system , 2013, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[21]  Robert Sessions Woodworth,et al.  THE ACCURACY OF VOLUNTARY MOVEMENT , 1899 .

[22]  K. Böcker,et al.  Brain and behavior : Past, present, and future , 1997 .

[23]  J. Wolpaw,et al.  Multichannel EEG-based brain-computer communication. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[24]  Luis Figueiredo,et al.  Hands-free interaction with a computer and other technologies , 2009, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[25]  M. Teplan FUNDAMENTALS OF EEG MEASUREMENT , 2002 .

[26]  Andrew T. Duchowski,et al.  Eye Tracking Methodology - Theory and Practice, Third Edition , 2003 .