Delivering improved initial embodied energy efficiency during construction

Energy use during the material, transportation and construction phases up to project practical completion is known as initial embodied energy. Contractors have the opportunity to capture initial embodied energy data and influence performance due to their significant involvement in project procurement and delivery. In this case study practical challenges and opportunities were addressed for delivering improved initial embodied energy efficiency during construction. A revised framework was applied to a live industrial warehouse project to assess the initial embodied energy performance of assorted construction activities, packages and sub-contractors. The practices employed by the contractor on-site were explored and then improved. Results show that material phase impacts represented 95.1% of the total initial embodied energy consumption whereby construction packages predominately containing steel and concrete-based materials (i.e. ground and upper floor, external slab and frame) were most significant. The overall initial embodied impact was deemed greater than the operational impact at the end of the buildings 25-year lifespan. Findings suggest that future project benchmarks and targets should be normalised per site area, as these impacts were found to be significant in this particular case.

[1]  Nicolas Roussel,et al.  Study of two concrete mix-design strategies to reach carbon mitigation objectives , 2009 .

[2]  Raymond J. Cole,et al.  Energy and greenhouse gas emissions associated with the construction of alternative structural systems , 1998 .

[3]  Rosi Fieldson,et al.  An assessment of carbon emissions from retail fit-out in the United Kingdom , 2009 .

[4]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  Using national input/output data for embodied energy analysis of individual residential buildings , 2001 .

[5]  Jamie Goggins,et al.  The assessment of embodied energy in typical reinforced concrete building structures in Ireland , 2010 .

[6]  Rahul V. Ralegaonkar,et al.  Improving environmental performance of building through increased energy efficiency: A review , 2011 .

[7]  Craig Langston,et al.  Reliability of building embodied energy modelling: an analysis of 30 Melbourne case studies , 2008 .

[8]  Mark Hughes,et al.  Comparison of life cycle assessment databases: A case study on building assessment , 2014 .

[9]  Peter Wild,et al.  Inadequate documentation in published life cycle energy reports on buildings , 2010 .

[10]  Robert Ries,et al.  Comparison of energy-based indicators used in life cycle assessment tools for buildings , 2014 .

[11]  Erleen Hatfield,et al.  Integrated Processes in Structural Engineering , 2007 .

[12]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  Embodied energy analysis of fixtures, fittings and furniture in office buildings , 1999 .

[13]  A. Inés Fernández,et al.  Low carbon and low embodied energy materials in buildings: A review , 2013 .

[14]  Michael J Tierney,et al.  Measured energy and water performance of an aspiring low energy/carbon affordable housing site in th , 2011 .

[15]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  A hybrid life cycle assessment method for construction , 2000 .

[16]  Douglas John Harris,et al.  A quantitative approach to the assessment of the environmental impact of building materials , 1999 .

[17]  Philip J. Davies,et al.  Addressing embodied energy from a contractor's perspective , 2013 .

[18]  Mohamed Al-Hussein,et al.  House construction CO2 footprint quantification: a BIM approach , 2011 .

[19]  Dennis L. Loveday,et al.  The calculation of embodied energy in new build UK housing , 2009 .

[20]  Dino Bouchlaghem,et al.  Predicted vs. actual energy performance of non-domestic buildings: Using post-occupancy evaluation data to reduce the performance gap , 2012 .

[21]  Kevin J. Lomas,et al.  Identifying trends in the use of domestic appliances from household electricity consumption measurements , 2008 .

[22]  Anna Lewandowska,et al.  Materials composition or energy characteristic – What is more important in environmental life cycle of buildings? , 2014 .

[23]  Shabbir H. Gheewala,et al.  Life cycle energy assessment of a typical office building in Thailand , 2009 .

[24]  Pieter de Wilde,et al.  The gap between predicted and measured energy performance of buildings: A framework for investigation , 2014 .

[25]  Gregory A. Keoleian,et al.  Life cycle energy and environmental performance of a new university building: modeling challenges and design implications , 2003 .

[26]  Philip J. Davies,et al.  On-site energy management challenges and opportunities: a contractor's perspective , 2013 .

[27]  Pavan Meadati,et al.  Integrating Construction Process Documentation into Building Information Modeling , 2008 .

[28]  Savvas A. Tassou,et al.  Energy consumption and conservation in food retailing , 2011 .

[29]  Leif Gustavsson,et al.  Life cycle primary energy use and carbon emission of an eight-storey wood-framed apartment building , 2010 .

[30]  Perry Forsythe,et al.  Sustainable construction: life cycle energy analysis of construction on sloping sites for residential buildings , 2013 .

[31]  Martin Belusko,et al.  Minimising the life cycle energy of buildings: Review and analysis , 2014 .

[32]  Christopher R. Iddon,et al.  Embodied and operational energy for new-build housing: A case study of construction methods in the UK , 2013 .

[33]  Jane Anderson,et al.  Carbon footprinting and labelling of construction products , 2011 .

[34]  Dino Bouchlaghem,et al.  Review of benchmarks for small power consumption in office buildings , 2012 .

[35]  L. Elghali,et al.  Climate change influence on building lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions: Case study of a UK mixed-use development , 2012 .

[36]  Xiao Hu,et al.  Assessment of CO2 emissions reduction in a distribution warehouse , 2011 .

[37]  John S. Monahan,et al.  An embodied carbon and energy analysis of modern methods of construction in housing: A case study us , 2011 .

[38]  H. K. Yu,et al.  Environmental impacts of building materials and building services components for commercial buildings in Hong Kong , 2007 .

[39]  Luisa F. Cabeza,et al.  Life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle energy analysis (LCEA) of buildings and the building sector: A review , 2014 .

[40]  J. Burnett,et al.  Analysis of embodied energy use in the residential building of Hong Kong , 2001 .

[41]  G. Treloar,et al.  Life-cycle energy analysis of buildings: a case study , 2000 .

[42]  Sarel Lavy,et al.  Need for an embodied energy measurement protocol for buildings: A review paper , 2012 .

[43]  Yimin Zhu,et al.  An LCA-based environmental impact assessment model for construction processes , 2010 .

[44]  K. Adalberth,et al.  Energy use during the life cycle of buildings: a method , 1997 .

[45]  Raymond J. Cole,et al.  Life-cycle energy use in office buildings , 1996 .

[46]  L. Gustavsson,et al.  Life cycle primary energy analysis of residential buildings , 2010 .

[47]  S. Citherlet,et al.  Energy and environmental comparison of three variants of a family house during its whole life span , 2007 .

[48]  Lei Xu,et al.  The life-cycle assessment of a single-storey retail building in Canada , 2012 .

[49]  Andrew H. Buchanan,et al.  Energy and carbon dioxide implications of building construction , 1994 .

[50]  Philip J. Davies,et al.  Challenges for capturing and assessing initial embodied energy: a contractor’s perspective , 2014 .

[51]  Giovanni Andrea Blengini,et al.  The changing role of life cycle phases, subsystems and materials in the LCA of low energy buildings , 2010 .

[52]  Sarel Lavy,et al.  Identification of parameters for embodied energy measurement: A literature review , 2010 .