The Misalignment of Product Architecture and Organizational Structure in Complex Product Development

Product architecture knowledge is typically embedded in the communication patterns of established development organizations. While this enables the development of products using the existing architecture, it hinders the organization's ability to implement novel architectures, especially for complex products. Structured methods addressing this issue are lacking, as previous research has studied complex product development from two separate perspectives: product architecture and organizational structure. Our research integrates these viewpoints with a structured approach to study how design interfaces in the product architecture map onto communication patterns within the development organization. We investigate how organizational and system boundaries, design interface strength, indirect interactions, and system modularity impact the alignment of design interfaces and team interactions. We hypothesize and test how these factors explain the existence of the following cases: (1) known design interfaces not addressed by team interactions, and (2) observed team interactions not predicted by design interfaces. Our results offer important insights to managers dealing with interdependences across organizational and functional boundaries. In particular, we show how boundary effects moderate the impact of design interface strength and indirect team interactions, and are contingent on system modularity. The research uses data collected from a large commercial aircraft engine development process.

[1]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Product Design and Development , 1995 .

[2]  T. Allen.  Managing the flow of technology , 1977 .

[3]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[4]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  Predicting technical communication in product development organizations , 1995 .

[5]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits , 1999 .

[6]  Christoph H. Loch,et al.  Communication and Uncertainty in Concurrent Engineering , 1998 .

[7]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Special Issue on Design and Development: Product Development Decisions: A Review of the Literature , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[8]  David Krackhardt,et al.  PREDICTING WITH NETWORKS: NONPARAMETRIC MULTIPLE REGRESSION ANALYSIS OF DYADIC DATA * , 1988 .

[9]  Dawn Iacobucci,et al.  Sequential social network data , 1988 .

[10]  Stephen E. Fienberg,et al.  Discrete Multivariate Analysis: Theory and Practice , 1976 .

[11]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT: PAST RESEARCH, PRESENT FINDINGS, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS , 1995 .

[12]  Ron Sanchez,et al.  Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design , 1996 .

[13]  Deborah G. . Ancona,et al.  Bridging the Boundary: External Activity and Performance in Organizational Teams. , 1992 .

[14]  Christopher Alexander.  Notes on the Synthesis of Form , 1964 .

[15]  Jay R. Galbraith.  Designing Complex Organizations , 1973 .

[16]  Christoph H. Loch,et al.  On Uncertainty, Ambiguity, and Complexity in Project Management , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[17]  John Scott.  What is social network analysis , 2010 .

[18]  P. Holland,et al.  An Exponential Family of Probability Distributions for Directed Graphs , 1981 .

[19]  Christoph H. Loch,et al.  Problem - Solving Oscillations in Complex Engineering Projects , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[20]  M. Tushman.  Special Boundary Roles in the Innovation Process. , 1977 .

[21]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  Knowledge Networks: Explaining Effective Knowledge Sharing in Multiunit Companies , 2002 .

[22]  P. V. Marsden,et al.  NETWORK DATA AND MEASUREMENT , 1990 .

[23]  Carolyn J. Anderson,et al.  A p* primer: logit models for social networks , 1999, Soc. Networks.

[24]  D. V. Steward,et al.  The design structure system: A method for managing the design of complex systems , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[25]  S. Wasserman,et al.  Logit models and logistic regressions for social networks: I. An introduction to Markov graphs andp , 1996 .

[26]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Design Rules: The Power of Modularity , 2000 .

[27]  Wolfgang Beitz,et al.  Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach , 1984 .

[28]  Franco Zambonelli,et al.  Knowledge Networks , 2005, WAC.

[29]  S. Fienberg,et al.  Categorical Data Analysis of Single Sociometric Relations , 1981 .

[30]  P. V. Marsden,et al.  Measuring Tie Strength , 1984 .

[31]  James D. Thompson.  Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[32]  Kristin L. Wood,et al.  A heuristic method for identifying modules for product architectures , 2000 .

[33]  Jonathon N. Cummings.  Work Groups, Structural Diversity, and Knowledge Sharing in a Global Organization , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[34]  Christophe Van den Bulte,et al.  The Effects of R&D Team Co-Location on Communication Patterns Among R&D, Marketing, and Manufacturing , 1998 .

[35]  Paul S. Adler,et al.  Interdepartmental Interdependence and Coordination: The Case of the Design/Manufacturing Interface , 1995 .

[36]  Robert P. Smith,et al.  A model-based method for organizing tasks in product development , 1994 .

[37]  Christoph H. Loch,et al.  Exchanging Preliminary Information in Concurrent Engineering: Alternative Coordination Strategies , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[38]  Ali Yassine,et al.  Information hiding in product development: the design churn effect , 2003 .

[39]  Stephen Potter,et al.  Automatic conceptual design using experience-derived heuristics , 2003 .

[40]  S. Wasserman,et al.  Logit models and logistic regressions for social networks: III. Valued relations , 1999 .

[41]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  Sloan School of Management Working Paper Factors That Influence Technical Communication in Distributed Product Development: an Empirical Study in the Telecommunications Industry Factors That Influence Technical Communication in Distributed Product Development: an Empirical Study in the Telecommunica , 2022 .

[42]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  Identifying Modular and Integrative Systems and Their Impact on Design Team Interactions , 2003 .

[43]  S. Wasserman,et al.  Logit models and logistic regressions for social networks: II. Multivariate relations. , 1999, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[44]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  Integration analysis of product decompositions , 1994 .

[45]  D. J. Strauss,et al.  Pseudolikelihood Estimation for Social Networks , 1990 .

[46]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.