Continuous adjoint approach to the Spalart–Allmaras turbulence model for incompressible flows

Abstract A continuous adjoint formulation for the computation of the sensitivities of integral functions used in steady-flow, incompressible aerodynamics is presented. Unlike earlier continuous adjoint methods, this paper computes the adjoint to both the mean-flow and turbulence equations by overcoming the frequently made assumption that the variation in turbulent viscosity can be neglected. The development is based on the Spalart–Allmaras turbulence model, using the adjoint to the corresponding differential equation and boundary conditions. The proposed formulation is general and can be used with any other integral function. Here, the continuous adjoint method yielding the sensitivities of the total pressure loss functional for duct flows with respect to the normal displacements of the solid wall nodes is presented. Using three duct flow problems, it is demonstrated that the adjoint to the turbulence equations should be taken into account to compute the sensitivity derivatives of this functional with high accuracy. The so-computed derivatives almost coincide with “reference” sensitivities resulting from the computationally expensive direct differentiation. This is not, however, the case of the sensitivities computed without solving the turbulence adjoint equation, which deviates from the reference values. The role of all newly appearing terms in the adjoint equations, their boundary conditions and the gradient expression is investigated, significant and insignificant terms are identified and a study on the Reynolds number effect is included.

[1]  Oh-Hyun Rho,et al.  Feasibility Study of Constant Eddy-Viscosity Assumption in Gradient-Based Design Optimization , 2003 .

[2]  O. Pironneau,et al.  Applied Shape Optimization for Fluids , 2001 .

[3]  M. Giles,et al.  Adjoint equations in CFD: duality, boundary conditions and solution behaviour , 1997 .

[4]  A. Jameson,et al.  STUDIES OF THE CONTINUOUS AND DISCRETE ADJOINT APPROACHES TO VISCOUS AUTOMATIC AERODYNAMIC SHAPE OPTIMIZATION , 2001 .

[5]  Yousef Saad,et al.  Iterative methods for sparse linear systems , 2003 .

[6]  A. D. Gosman,et al.  Two calculation procedures for steady, three-dimensional flows with recirculation , 1973 .

[7]  D. I. Papadimitriou,et al.  Total pressure loss minimization in turbomachinery cascades using a new continuous adjoint formulation , 2007 .

[8]  W. K. Anderson,et al.  Aerodynamic design optimization on unstructured grids with a continuous adjoint formulation , 1997 .

[9]  Oktay Baysal,et al.  Three-dimensional aerodynamic shape optimization using discrete sensitivity analysis , 1996 .

[10]  C. Othmer A continuous adjoint formulation for the computation of topological and surface sensitivities of ducted flows , 2008 .

[11]  Joel Brezillon,et al.  Aerodynamic shape optimization using simultaneous pseudo-timestepping , 2005 .

[12]  Marian Nemec,et al.  Improvements to a Newton-Krylov Adjoint Algorithm for Aerodynamic Optimization , 2005 .

[13]  A. Jameson,et al.  Optimum Aerodynamic Design Using the Navier–Stokes Equations , 1997 .

[14]  Kyriakos C. Giannakoglou,et al.  A Continuous Adjoint Method for the Minimization of Losses in Cascade Viscous Flows , 2006 .

[15]  W. K. Anderson,et al.  Airfoil Design on Unstructured Grids for Turbulent Flows , 1999 .

[16]  Antony Jameson,et al.  Aerodynamic design via control theory , 1988, J. Sci. Comput..

[17]  Kyriakos C. Giannakoglou,et al.  A continuous adjoint method with objective function derivatives based on boundary integrals, for inviscid and viscous flows , 2007 .

[18]  Manuel D. Salas,et al.  Admitting the Inadmissible: Adjoint Formulation for Incomplete Cost Functionals in Aerodynamic Optimization , 1997 .

[19]  K. Giannakoglou,et al.  COMPRESSOR BLADE OPTIMIZATION USING A CONTINUOUS ADJOINT FORMULATION , 2006 .

[20]  D. Mavriplis Discrete Adjoint-Based Approach for Optimization Problems on Three-Dimensional Unstructured Meshes , 2007 .

[21]  R. Dwight,et al.  Effect of Approximations of the Discrete Adjoint on Gradient-Based Optimization , 2006 .

[22]  D. Darmofal,et al.  An implicit, exact dual adjoint solution method for turbulent flows on unstructured grids , 2004 .

[23]  Byung Joon Lee,et al.  Automated design methodology of turbulent internal flow using discrete adjoint formulation , 2007 .

[24]  P. Spalart A One-Equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic Flows , 1992 .

[25]  O. Pironneau On optimum design in fluid mechanics , 1974 .

[26]  Michael B. Giles,et al.  The harmonic adjoint approach to unsteady turbomachinery design , 2002 .

[27]  Jaime Peraire,et al.  Aerodynamic design using unstructured meshes , 1996 .

[28]  Niles A. Pierce,et al.  An Introduction to the Adjoint Approach to Design , 2000 .