“I just do what the boys tell me”: Exploring small group student interactions in an integrated STEM unit

[1]  Andrew Tolmie,et al.  Gender and Dialogue in Secondary School Physics. , 1993 .

[2]  Aran W. Glancy,et al.  Implementation and integration of engineering in K-12 STEM education , 2014 .

[3]  Wolff-Michael Roth,et al.  Interactions in an open‐inquiry physics laboratory , 1996 .

[4]  S. Selcen Guzey,et al.  STEM Integration in Middle School Life Science: Student Learning and Attitudes , 2016 .

[5]  Philip M. Sadler,et al.  Research and Teaching. The Science Identity of College Students: Exploring the Intersection of Gender, Race, and Ethnicity. , 2013 .

[6]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Everyday Problem Solving in Engineering: Lessons for Engineering Educators , 2006 .

[7]  Liora Bresler,et al.  Working in the Interpretive Zone: Conceptualizing Collaboration in Qualitative Research Teams , 1996 .

[8]  J. Novak,et al.  A Twelve-Year Longitudinal Study of Science Concept Learning , 1991 .

[9]  Kristen B. Wendell,et al.  Engineering Design‐Based Science, Science Content Performance, and Science Attitudes in Elementary School , 2013 .

[10]  L. Smith-Lovin,et al.  INTERRUPTIONS IN GROUP DISCUSSIONS: THE EFFECTS OF GENDER AND GROUP COMPOSITION* , 1989 .

[11]  Peter Blatchford,et al.  Improving the effectiveness of collaborative group work in primary schools: effects on science attainment , 2007 .

[12]  Caroline Baillie,et al.  Confusions and Conventions: Qualitative Research in Engineering Education , 2014 .

[13]  N. Brickhouse,et al.  What Kind of a Girl Does Science? The Construction of School Science Identities , 2000 .

[14]  Chris Merrill,et al.  Understanding STEM: Current perceptions , 2011 .

[15]  J. Lemke.  Articulating communities: Sociocultural perspectives on science education , 2001 .

[16]  Felicia M. Moore,et al.  Girls and science: A review of four themes in the science education literature , 2008 .

[17]  Paul Wesley Scott,et al.  Supporting girls’ and boys’ engagement in math and science learning: A mixed methods study , 2018 .

[18]  Douglas B. Clark,et al.  The Impact of Collaboration on the Outcomes of Scientific Argumentation. , 2009 .

[19]  Aran W. Glancy,et al.  A Framework for Quality K-12 Engineering Education: Research and Development , 2014 .

[20]  Gokhan Pekcan,et al.  The Effects of Engineering Modules on Student Learning in Middle School Science Classrooms , 2006 .

[21]  Gail Richmond,et al.  Making meaning in classrooms: Social processes in small‐group discourse and scientific knowledge building , 1996 .

[22]  Emily A. Dare,et al.  From Conception to Curricula: The Role of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics in Integrated STEM Units , 2018, International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology.

[23]  P. Peterson,et al.  2 – Autonomous Learning Behavior: A Possible Explanation of Gender-Related Differences in Mathematics , 1985 .

[24]  Marold Wosnitza,et al.  Inquiry and groups: student interactions in cooperative inquiry-based science , 2016 .

[25]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Cooperative Versus Competitive Efforts and Problem Solving , 1995 .

[26]  Carol S. Dweck,et al.  Motivational processes affecting learning. , 1986 .

[27]  E. Lim.  The factors influencing young children's social interaction in technology integration , 2015 .

[28]  Robert W. Mann,et al.  Engineering Design Education: U.S.—Retrospective and Contemporary , 1981 .

[29]  M. G. Jones,et al.  Gender Differences in Motivation and Strategy Use in Science: Are Girls Rote Learners?. , 1996 .

[30]  Adam V. Maltese,et al.  The Nature of Experiences Responsible for the Generation and Maintenance of Interest in STEM , 2014 .

[31]  Léonie J. Rennie,et al.  Gender Differences in Science Education: Building a Model , 1993 .

[32]  Karen L. Tonso,et al.  Teams that Work: Campus Culture, Engineer Identity, and Social Interactions , 2006 .

[33]  Robin Adams,et al.  The Informed Design Teaching and Learning Matrix , 2012 .

[34]  J. Jovanovic,et al.  Boys and Girls in the Performance-Based Science Classroom: Who’s Doing the Performing? , 1998 .

[35]  Sex-Related Differences in High School Science and Mathematics Enrollments: Do They Give Males a Critical Headstart Toward Science- and Math-Related Careers?. , 1983 .

[36]  Leonard Springer,et al.  Effects of Small-Group Learning on Undergraduates in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology: A Meta-Analysis , 1997 .

[37]  Jonathan Osborne,et al.  "Doing" Science versus "Being" a Scientist: Examining 10/11-Year-Old Schoolchildren's Constructions of Science through the Lens of Identity. , 2010 .

[38]  Joanna Wolfe,et al.  Biases in Interpersonal Communication: How Engineering Students Perceive Gender Typical Speech Acts in Teamwork , 2009 .

[39]  Julie A. Bianchini,et al.  Where knowledge construction, equity, and context intersect: Student learning of science in small groups , 1997 .

[40]  Ming-Te Wang.  Educational and career interests in math: a longitudinal examination of the links between classroom environment, motivational beliefs, and interests. , 2012, Developmental psychology.

[41]  G. Roehrig,et al.  "If I Had to Do It, Then I Would": Understanding Early Middle School Students' Perceptions of Physics and Physics-Related Careers by Gender. , 2016 .

[42]  Y. Lou,et al.  Within-Class Grouping: A Meta-Analysis , 1996 .

[43]  Science and Engineering for Grades 6-12 , 2019 .

[44]  Edna Tan,et al.  Creating Hybrid Spaces for Engaging School Science Among Urban Middle School Girls , 2008 .

[45]  Emily A. Dare.  Understanding Middle School Students' Perceptions of Physics Using Girl-Friendly and Integrated STEM Strategies: A Gender Study , 2015 .

[46]  Julian Swain,et al.  Students' discussions in practical scientific inquiries , 2004 .

[47]  T. J. Kennedy,et al.  Engaging Students In STEM Education , 2014 .

[48]  J. Ferrari,et al.  Exploring Academic Procrastination Among Turkish Students: Possible Gender Differences in Prevalence and Reasons , 2009, The Journal of social psychology.

[49]  G. Wheatley.  Constructivist perspectives on science and mathematics learning , 1991 .

[50]  Anne Watson,et al.  New Directions for Situated Cognition in Mathematics Education , 2007 .

[51]  Peter Blatchford,et al.  Changes in grouping practices over primary and secondary school , 2003 .

[52]  J. R. Landis,et al.  An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers. , 1977, Biometrics.

[53]  Philip M. Sadler,et al.  The Science Identity of College Students: Exploring the Intersection of Gender, Race, and Ethnicity , 2013 .

[54]  Lauren B. Adamson,et al.  DOING A SCIENCE PROJECT : GENDER DIFFERENCES DURING CHILDHOOD , 1998 .

[55]  Peter Labudde,et al.  Girls and physics: teaching and learning strategies tested by classroom interventions in grade 11 , 2000 .

[56]  O. Jegede.  School science and the development of scientific culture: a review of contemporary science education in Africa , 1997 .

[57]  Dennis Fung,et al.  Enhancing Science Learning Through the Introduction of Effective Group Work in Hong Kong Secondary Classrooms , 2018 .

[58]  M. G. Jones,et al.  Gender differences in students' experiences, interests, and attitudes toward science and scientists , 2000 .

[59]  Christine M. Cunningham,et al.  ENGINEERING IN ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS , 2014 .

[60]  Carol R. Rinke,et al.  Characterizing STEM Teacher Education: Affordances and Constraints of Explicit STEM Preparation for Elementary Teachers , 2016 .

[61]  P. Scott,et al.  Constructing Scientific Knowledge in the Classroom , 1994 .

[62]  Devasmita Chakraverty,et al.  The Association of Family Influence and Initial Interest in Science , 2013 .

[63]  Daniel P. Shepardson.  Social Interactions and the Mediation of Science Learning in Two Small Groups of First-Graders. , 1996 .

[64]  Dale R. Baker,et al.  What Works: Using Curriculum and Pedagogy to Increase Girls' Interest and Participation in Science , 2013 .

[65]  J. Boaler.  Reclaiming School Mathematics: The girls fight back , 1997 .

[66]  Stanley B. Straw,et al.  The effect of talk and writing on learning science: An exploratory study , 2000 .

[67]  Jacob Cohen.  A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[68]  Neil Mercer,et al.  Explaining the dialogic processes of teaching and learning: The value and potential of sociocultural theory , 2012 .

[69]  Christine Schnittka,et al.  ''Can I Drop It This Time?'' Gender and Collaborative Group Dynamics in an Engineering Design-Based Afterschool Program. , 2016 .

[70]  A. Zohar.  Connected Knowledge in Science and Mathematics Education , 2006 .

[71]  Brenda Capobianco,et al.  Engineering Identity Development Among Pre‐Adolescent Learners , 2012 .

[72]  R. Duschl,et al.  "Doing the Lesson" or "Doing Science": Argument in High School Genetics , 2000 .

[73]  D. Hodson.  Going beyond cultural pluralism: Science education for sociopolitical action , 1999 .

[74]  P. Scott,et al.  Individual and Sociocultural Views of Learning in Science Education , 2003 .

[75]  H. Patrick,et al.  Early Adolescents' Motivation During Science Investigation , 2004 .

[76]  M. O’Loughlin,et al.  Rethinking science education: Beyond piagetian constructivism toward a sociocultural model of teaching and learning† , 2007 .

[77]  M. G. Jones,et al.  Tool Time: Gender and Students' Use of Tools, Control, and Authority. , 2000 .