Prompting conceptual understanding with computer-mediated peer discourse and knowledge acquisition techniques

Numerous computer-mediated communication (CMC) tools have been designed to facilitate group discourses on the Web. However, previous studies noted that participants did not value online conferencing as a method for conducting in-depth discussions, and instead considered this method as merely scratching the surface of the issues involved. Therefore, the teachers must moderate the online discourse to add value to the success of CMC. This study presents a methodology that uses knowledge acquisition techniques during online discourses to increase student conceptual understanding and evaluation skills. The methodology explains the conceptual frameworks of individuals and the conceptual relationships between student peers. Active database triggers then are applied to automatically monitor the conceptual relationships and to moderate online discourses between student peers. Student reactions demonstrated that discourses mediated by the repertory grid analysis technique helped group members not only promote common conceptual understandings but also to approach the level of conceptual understanding of the teacher.

[1]  Won Kim,et al.  Modern Database Systems: The Object Model, Interoperability, and Beyond , 1995, Modern Database Systems.

[2]  TINA WILSON,et al.  What are the perceived benefits of participating in a computer-mediated communication (CMC) environment for distance learning computer science students? , 1998, Comput. Educ..

[3]  D. Holman,et al.  Using repertory grids in management , 1996 .

[4]  K. Topping.  Peer Assessment Between Students in Colleges and Universities , 1998 .

[5]  Karen L. McGraw,et al.  Knowledge Acquisition: Principles and Guidelines , 1989 .

[6]  Judith A. Brook.  Use of the Repertory Grid in Career Counseling , 1992 .

[7]  Curtis J. Bonk,et al.  Communication in a web-based conferencing system: the quality of computer-mediated interactions , 2003, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[8]  Brian R. Gaines,et al.  Comparing constructions through the Web , 1995, CSCL.

[9]  N. Falchikov,et al.  Student Peer Assessment in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Peer and Teacher Marks , 2000 .

[10]  Terence R. Keen,et al.  Personal Construct Psychology and Education , 1981 .

[11]  G. Kelly.  The Psychology of Personal Constructs , 2020 .

[12]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  The Virtual Classroom: Learning Without Limits Via Computer Networks , 1994 .

[13]  Gerhard A. Kainz,et al.  Multimedia-based case studies in education: design, development, and evaluation of multimedia-based case studies , 1997 .

[14]  B. J. Liu,et al.  Intervention and strategy analysis for web group-learning , 2001, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[15]  R. J. Martin,et al.  The effect of questioning on concept learning within a hypertext system , 2002, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[16]  Roger Austin.  Computer conferencing; discourse, education and conflict mediation , 1997, Comput. Educ..

[17]  J. T. McDonough,et al.  Content Analysis. A Technique for Systematic Inference from Communications , 1974 .

[18]  Benjamin S. Bloom,et al.  Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. , 1957 .

[19]  M. Resnick.  Distributed Constructionism , 1996, ICLS.

[20]  Chen‐Chung Liu *,et al.  Peer assessment through web‐based knowledge acquisition: tools to support conceptual awareness , 2005 .

[21]  Donald Christie,et al.  The repertory grid as a tool for reflection in the professional development of practitioners in early education , 1997 .

[22]  Vipin Kumar,et al.  Chameleon: Hierarchical Clustering Using Dynamic Modeling , 1999, Computer.

[23]  Wolff‐Michael Roth,et al.  Science discourse through collaborative concept mapping: new perspectives for the teacher , 1994 .

[24]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Teaching Students to Be Peacemakers , 1992 .

[25]  Brian R. Gaines,et al.  Modeling the social practices of users in Internet communities , 1999 .

[26]  John H. Boose,et al.  Uses of Repertory Grid-Centred Knowledge Acquisition Tools for Knowledge-Based Systems , 1988, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[27]  Lone Dirckinck-Holmfeld,et al.  Using Telematics for Collaborative Knowledge Construction , 1999 .

[28]  D. Schoen.  The Reflective Practitioner , 1983 .

[29]  Fred Phillips,et al.  Using Hypertext in Instructional Material: Helping Students Link Accounting Concept Knowledge to Case Applications , 2002 .

[30]  Irit Bar-Natan,et al.  Writing development of Arab and Jewish students using cooperative learning (CL) and computer-mediated communication (CMC) , 2002, Comput. Educ..

[31]  Tony Fetherstonhaugh,et al.  Using the Repertory Grid to Probe Students’ Ideas about Energy , 1994 .

[32]  Jeffrey M. Bradshaw,et al.  Knowledge acquisition as a constructive modeling activity , 1993, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[33]  Robert Davies,et al.  An evaluation of the use of computer supported peer review for developing higher-level skills , 1998, Comput. Educ..

[34]  Philippa Levy,et al.  Technological support for teaching and learning: computer-mediated communications in higher education (CMC in HE) , 1996, Comput. Educ..

[35]  Gwo-Dong Chen,et al.  Web Learning Portfolios: A Tool For Supporting Performance Awareness , 2001 .

[36]  Gilly Salmon,et al.  Mirror, mirror, on my screen≡ Exploring online reflections , 2002, Br. J. Educ. Technol..