Seeing one thing and doing another: Contrast effects in automatic behavior.

Research on automatic behavior demonstrates the ability of stereotypes to elicit stereotype-consistent behavior. Social judgment research proposes that whereas traits and stereotypes elicit assimilation, priming of exemplars can elicit judgmental contrast by evoking social comparisons. This research extends these findings by showing that priming exemplars can elicit behavioral contrast by evoking a social comparison. In Study 1, priming professor or supermodel stereotypes led, respectively, to more and fewer correct answers on a knowledge test (behavioral assimilation), but priming exemplars of these categories led to the reverse pattern (behavioral contrast). In Study 2, participants walked away faster after being primed with an elderly exemplar. In Study 3, the proposition that contrast effects reflect comparisons of the self with the exemplar was supported.

[1]  Eliot R. Smith,et al.  Exemplar-Based Model of Social Judgment , 1992 .

[2]  Norbert Schwarz,et al.  Constructing reality and its alternatives: an inclusion/ exclusion model of assimilation and contrast effects in social judgment , 1992 .

[3]  Rupert Brown,et al.  Category and stereotype activation: Is prejudice inevitable? , 1997 .

[4]  M. Manis,et al.  Judging psychopathology: Expectation and contrast , 1984 .

[5]  P. Herr,et al.  On the consequences of priming: Assimilation and contrast effects , 1983 .

[6]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  Flexible Correction Processes in Social Judgment: Correcting for Context-Induced Contrast , 1993 .

[7]  T. K. Srull,et al.  Category accessibility and social perception: Some implications for the study of person memory and interpersonal judgments , 1980 .

[8]  Steven L. Neuberg,et al.  A Continuum of Impression Formation, from Category-Based to Individuating Processes: Influences of Information and Motivation on Attention and Interpretation , 1990 .

[9]  L. Festinger.  A Theory of Social Comparison Processes , 1954 .

[10]  P. Herr,et al.  Consequences of priming: Judgment and behavior. , 1986 .

[11]  J. V. Wood,et al.  Theory and Research Concerning Social Comparisons of Personal Attributes , 1989 .

[12]  Leonard L. Martin,et al.  Assimilation and contrast as a function of people's willingness and ability to expend effort in forming an impression. , 1990 .

[13]  J. Bruner.  On perceptual readiness. , 1957, Psychological review.

[14]  J. Bargh,et al.  Nonconscious Behavioral Confirmation Processes: The Self-Fulfilling Consequences of Automatic Stereotype Activation , 1997 .

[15]  M. Manis,et al.  Specificity in contrast effects: Judgments of psychopathology☆ , 1984 .

[16]  C. Carver,et al.  Modeling: An analysis in terms of category accessibility. , 1983 .

[17]  D. Gilbert,et al.  On cognitive busyness: When person perceivers meet persons perceived. , 1988 .

[18]  D T Gilbert,et al.  When comparisons arise. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  James T. Townsend,et al.  Cognition, Information Processing, and Psychophysics: Basic Issues , 1992 .

[20]  C. I. Hovland,et al.  Social Judgment: Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Communication and Attitude Change , 1981 .

[21]  F. Strack,et al.  Awareness of influence as a precondition for implementing correctional goals. , 1996 .

[22]  Wolfgang Prinz,et al.  Psychophysical explorations of mental structures , 1990 .

[23]  E. Higgins.  Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. , 1996 .

[24]  Thomas E. Nelson,et al.  Stereotypes and social judgment: Extremity, assimilation, and contrast. , 1988 .

[25]  E. Higgins,et al.  Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles. , 1996 .

[26]  Eliot R. Smith,et al.  Exemplar and Prototype Use in Social Categorization , 1990 .

[27]  Joop van der Pligt,et al.  Categories of Category Accessibility: The Impact of Trait Concept versus Exemplar Priming on Person Judgments ☆ , 1997 .

[28]  A. van Knippenberg,et al.  The relation between perception and behavior, or how to win a game of trivial pursuit. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[29]  W. S. Rholes,et al.  Category accessibility and impression formation , 1977 .

[30]  R. Rosenthal,et al.  “Some Things You Learn Aren't So”: Cohen's Paradox, Asch's Paradigm, and the Interpretation of Interaction , 1995 .

[31]  T. K. Srull,et al.  The Role of Category Accessibility in the Interpretation of Information About Persons: Some Determinants and Implications , 1979 .

[32]  J. Uleman,et al.  When are social judgments made? Evidence for the spontaneousness of trait inferences. , 1984, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[33]  J. Bargh,et al.  Automaticity of social behavior: direct effects of trait construct and stereotype-activation on action. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[34]  R. Spears,et al.  Event Accessibility and Context Effects in Causal Inference: Judgment of a Different Order , 1996 .

[35]  B. Levy.  Improving memory in old age through implicit self-stereotyping. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[36]  Leonard L. Martin,et al.  Beyond accessibility: The role of processing objectives in judgment , 1992 .

[37]  J. Pligt,et al.  The Referents of Trait Inferences: The Impact of Trait Concepts Versus Actor-Trait Links on Subsequent Judgments , 1996 .

[38]  C. Stangor,et al.  Activating social stereotypes: A functional analysis. , 1994 .

[39]  M. Brewer.  A dual process model of impression formation. , 1988 .

[40]  J. G. Holmes,et al.  Salient Private Audiences and Awareness of the Self , 1987 .

[41]  M. Hogg,et al.  Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. , 1989 .

[42]  J. Bargh.  The automaticity of everyday life. , 1997 .

[43]  P. Devine.  Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. , 1989 .