The influence of sensory memory and attention on the context effect in talker normalization

Studies on talker normalization have reported that contexts would affect how a vowel/consonant/tone is perceived, which suggests that listeners use cues in the context as a reference for speech perception. However, it is unclear how the cues of the context are encoded in memory, and to what extent the context effects are influenced by interruption in sensory memory and reduction in attentional resources. To fill in this gap, this study examined the effects of noise interruption and a secondary visual task on the identification of words carrying level tones in context by native Cantonese speakers. Experiment 1 compared the tone identification performance between a block where a 300ms noise was presented immediately after the context to interrupt the normalization effects of the context on the following target word and a block without noise interruption. Experiment 2 compared the tone identification performance between a block where participants had to perform a secondary visual task (picture same/different discrimination) and a block without a secondary visual task. Results suggest that context cues are likely encoded both in sensory memory and in short-term categorical memory and that reduction in attentional resources has marginal influence on tone normalization.

[1]  Fanny Meunier,et al.  2010, a Speech Oddity: Phonetic Transcription of Reversed Speech , 2010, INTERSPEECH.

[2]  L. Holt,et al.  Evidence for the central origin of lexical tone normalization (L). , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  William S-Y. Wang,et al.  Unequal effects of speech and nonspeech contexts on the perceptual normalization of Cantonese level tones. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  L. Holt Speech categorization in context: joint effects of nonspeech and speech precursors. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  L. Holt The mean matters: effects of statistically defined nonspeech spectral distributions on speech categorization. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  L. Holt,et al.  General perceptual contributions to lexical tone normalization. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  Patrick C M Wong,et al.  Perceptual normalization for inter- and intratalker variation in Cantonese level tones. , 2003, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[8]  Alexander L. Francis,et al.  Extrinsic context affects perceptual normalization of lexical tone. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  Coarticulation • Suprasegmentals,et al.  Acoustic Phonetics , 2019, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Human Communication Sciences and Disorders.

[10]  A. Lotto,et al.  Speech Perception Within an Auditory Cognitive Science Framework , 2008, Current directions in psychological science.

[11]  Matthias J. Sjerps,et al.  Speaker Normalization in Speech Perception , 2008, The Handbook of Speech Perception.

[12]  Alexander L. Francis,et al.  Effects of Language Experience and Stimulus Complexity on the Categorical Perception of Pitch Direction , 2006 .

[13]  William S-Y. Wang,et al.  Achieving constancy in spoken word identification: Time course of talker normalization , 2013, Brain and Language.

[14]  D. Broadbent,et al.  Information Conveyed by Vowels , 1957 .

[15]  J. Mullennix,et al.  Talker Variability in Speech Processing , 1997 .