A Framework for the Selection of Optimum Offshore Wind Farm Locations for Deployment

This research develops a framework to assist wind energy developers to select the optimum deployment site of a wind farm by considering the Round 3 available zones in the UK. The framework includes optimization techniques, decision-making methods and experts’ input in order to support investment decisions. Further, techno-economic evaluation, life cycle costing (LCC) and physical aspects for each location are considered along with experts’ opinions to provide deeper insight into the decision-making process. A process on the criteria selection is also presented and seven conflicting criteria are being considered for implementation in the technique for the order of preference by similarity to the ideal solution (TOPSIS) method in order to suggest the optimum location that was produced by the nondominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGAII). For the given inputs, Seagreen Alpha, near the Isle of May, was found to be the most probable solution, followed by Moray Firth Eastern Development Area 1, near Wick, which demonstrates by example the effectiveness of the newly introduced framework that is also transferable and generic. The outcomes are expected to help stakeholders and decision makers to make better informed and cost-effective decisions under uncertainty when investing in offshore wind energy in the UK.

[1]  Inspire policy making by territorial evidence ESPON Policy Brief , 2015 .

[2]  Michele Samorani,et al.  The Wind Farm Layout Optimization Problem , 2011 .

[3]  Nishikant Mishra,et al.  A hybrid approach of VIKOR and bi-objective integer linear programming for electrification planning in a disaster relief camp , 2019, Ann. Oper. Res..

[4]  Maurizio Collu,et al.  Application and extension of the TOPSIS method for the assessment of floating offshore wind turbine support structures , 2013 .

[5]  Lin Wang,et al.  Integrated structural optimisation of offshore wind turbine support structures based on finite element analysis and genetic algorithm , 2017 .

[6]  Shin-Yeu Lin,et al.  Distributed optimal power flow for smart grid transmission system with renewable energy sources , 2013 .

[7]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Multiple Attribute Decision Making — An Overview , 1992 .

[8]  Milosz Kadzinski,et al.  Robust ordinal regression in preference learning and ranking , 2013, Machine Learning.

[9]  Yuan Yuan,et al.  Sustainable operation-oriented investment risk evaluation and optimization for renewable energy project: a case study of wind power in China , 2020, Ann. Oper. Res..

[10]  Mahmood Shafiee,et al.  Towards whole life-cycle costing of large-scale offshore wind farms , 2015 .

[11]  Anastasia Ioannou,et al.  Application of multi-criteria decision-making to risk prioritisation in tidal energy developments , 2016 .

[12]  Feargal Brennan,et al.  Multi-criteria assessment of offshore wind turbine support structures , 2011 .

[13]  Sri Lanka,et al.  A hybrid tool to combine multi-objective optimization and multi-criterion decision making in designing standalone hybrid energy systems , 2013 .

[14]  Stephen R. Petersen,et al.  Life-cycle costing manual for the Federal Energy Management Program , 1996 .

[15]  C. Zopounidis,et al.  Multiple criteria hierarchy process for sorting problems based on ordinal regression with additive value functions , 2015, Annals of Operations Research.

[16]  Marcus Nordahl.  The development of a Life Cycle Cost model for an offshore wind farm , 2011 .

[17]  Milan Zeleny.  Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM): From Paradigm Lost to Paradigm Regained?* , 2011 .

[18]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Methods for Multiple Attribute Decision Making , 1981 .

[19]  José Ramón San Cristóbal,et al.  Multi Criteria Analysis in the Renewable Energy Industry , 2012 .

[20]  Maria Dicorato,et al.  Guidelines for assessment of investment cost for offshore wind generation , 2011 .

[21]  Konstantinos Chalvatzis,et al.  Sustainable resource allocation for power generation: The role of big data in enabling interindustry architectural innovation , 2019, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[22]  Huan Qi,et al.  A Extended TOPSIS Method for the Stochastic Multi-Criteria Decision Making Problem through Interval Estimation , 2010, 2010 2nd International Workshop on Intelligent Systems and Applications.

[23]  Athanasios Kolios,et al.  A multi-objective optimisation approach applied to offshore wind farm location selection , 2017 .

[24]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Multiple attribute decision making : an introduction , 1995 .

[25]  Konstantinos Salonitis,et al.  Multi-criteria decision analysis of offshore wind turbines support structures under stochastic inputs , 2014 .

[26]  Matthew Hall,et al.  A multi-objective design optimization approach for floating offshore wind turbine support structures , 2017 .

[27]  A. Kolios,et al.  A Comparative Study of Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making Methods under Stochastic Inputs , 2016 .

[28]  Dylan F. Jones,et al.  An extended goal programming model for site selection in the offshore wind farm sector , 2016, Ann. Oper. Res..

[29]  Dimitrios Zafirakis,et al.  Integrated grey relational analysis and multi objective grey linear programming for sustainable electricity generation planning , 2018, Ann. Oper. Res..

[30]  G. Di Lorenzo,et al.  A comparative multi-disciplinary policy review in wind energy developments in Europe , 2017 .

[31]  S. Greco,et al.  A robust ranking method extending ELECTRE III to hierarchy of interacting criteria, imprecise weights and stochastic analysis , 2017 .

[32]  Salvatore Greco,et al.  Multiple Criteria Hierarchy Process for the Choquet Integral , 2013, EMO.

[33]  Athanasios Kolios,et al.  Failure Mode Identification and End of Life Scenarios of Offshore Wind Turbines: A Review , 2015 .

[34]  Castro-Santos Laura,et al.  Life-cycle cost analysis of floating offshore wind farms , 2014 .

[35]  Salvatore Greco,et al.  Multiple Criteria Hierarchy Process in Robust Ordinal Regression , 2012, Decis. Support Syst..