Biophysics of underwater hearing in the clawed frog, Xenopus laevis

Anesthetized clawed frogs (Xenopus laevis) were stimulated with underwater sound and the tympanic disk vibrations were studied using laser vibrometry. The tympanic disk velocities ranged from 0.01 to 0.5 mm/s (at a sound pressure of 2 Pa) in the frequency range of 0.4–4 kHz and were 20–40 dB higher than those of the surrounding tissue. The frequency response of the disk had two peaks, in the range of 0.6–1.1 kHz and 1.6–2.2 kHz, respectively. The first peak corresponded to the peak vibrations of the body wall overlying the lung. The second peak matched model predictions of the pulsations of the air bubble in the middle ear cavity. Filling the middle ear cavity with water lowered the disk vibrations by 10–30 dB in the frequency range of 0.5–3 kHz.Inflating the lungs shifted the low-frequency peak downwards, but did not change the high-frequency peak. Thus, the disk vibrations in the frequency range of the mating call (main energy at 1.7–1.9 kHz) were mainly caused by pulsations of the air in the middle ear cavity; sound transmission via the lungs was more important at low frequencies (below 1 kHz). Furthermore, the low-frequency peak could be reversibly reduced in amplitude by loading the larynx with metal or tissue glue. This shows that the sound-induced vibrations of the lungs are probably coupled to the middle ear cavities via the larynx. Also, anatomical observations show that the two middle ear cavities and the larynx are connected in an air-filled recess in submerged animals.This arrangement is unique to pipid frogs and may be a structural adaptation to connect all the air spaces of the frog and improve low-frequency underwater hearing. Another function of the recess may be to allow cross-talk between the two middle ear cavities. Thus, the ear might be directional. Our pilot experiments show up to 10 dB difference between ipsi- and contralateral stimulus directions in a narrow frequency range around 2 kHz.

[1]  Peter H. Rogers,et al.  Underwater Sound as a Biological Stimulus , 1988 .

[2]  Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard,et al.  Biophysics of directional hearing in the frog Eleutherodactylus coqui , 1991, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[3]  W. J. M. Epping,et al.  Directional hearing in the grass frog ( Rana temporaria L.): I. Mechanical vibrations of tympanic membrane , 1984, Hearing Research.

[4]  Frequency Coding in the Inner Ear of Anuran Amphibians , 1938 .

[5]  Bernd Fritzsch The Water-to-Land Transition: Evolution of the Tetrapod Basilar Papilla, Middle Ear, and Auditory Nuclei , 1992 .

[6]  E. Wever,et al.  The Amphibian Ear , 1985 .

[7]  J. Tautz,et al.  Hearing through the lungs: Lung-eardrum transmission of sound in the frogEleutherodactylus coqui , 1990, Naturwissenschaften.

[8]  A. Elepfandt,et al.  Lateral-line responses to water surface waves in the clawed frog,Xenopus laevis , 1987, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[9]  Robert J. Urick,et al.  Principles of underwater sound , 1975 .

[10]  Christopher Platt,et al.  Fine Structure and Function of the Ear , 1981 .

[11]  D. D. Yager UNDERWATER ACOUSTIC COMMUNICATION IN THE AFRICAN PIPID FROG XENOPUS BOREALIS , 1992 .

[12]  R. Fay,et al.  Underwater Hearing in the Frog, Rana Catesbeiana , 1981 .

[13]  R M Alexander,et al.  PHYSICAL ASPECTS OF SWIMBLADDER FUNCTION , 1966, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[14]  D. D. Yager A unique sound production mechanism in the pipid anuran Xenopus borealis , 1992 .

[15]  Arie Schuijf,et al.  Models of Acoustic Localization , 1981 .

[16]  J. Christensen-Dalsgaard,et al.  Directional hearing of awake, unrestrained treefrogs , 1986, Naturwissenschaften.

[17]  T. Hetherington,et al.  Biophysics of underwater hearing in anuran amphibians. , 1982, The Journal of experimental biology.

[18]  M. Picker Hormonal Induction of the Aquatic Phonotactic Response of Xenopus by , 1983 .

[19]  J. Christensen-Dalsgaard,et al.  Underwater hearing in the clawed frog,Xenopus laevis , 1990, Naturwissenschaften.

[20]  J. Tautz,et al.  Accessory pathway for sound transfer in a neotropical frog. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  L. Licht Comparative breeding behavior of the red-legged frog (Rana aurora aurora) and the western spotted frog (Rana pretiosa pretiosa) in southwestern British Columbia , 1969 .

[22]  W. van Bergeijk Evolution of the sense of hearing in vertebrates. , 1966, American zoologist.

[23]  Willem A. Bergeijk Evolution of the sense of hearing in vertebrates. , 1966 .