Design and experimental testing of a robust multivariable controller on a tokamak

Describes the design and the experimental validation of a multivariable digital controller for a Tokamak, the Tokamak a configuration variable (TCV). The design of the controller is based on a linearized model of the plasma confined in the Tokamak. The plant is multiple-input-multiple-output (MIMO) and the various outputs are strongly coupled. Moreover the plant is open-loop unstable. The scope of the controller is to stabilize the plasma and to guarantee some closed-loop performance in terms of decoupling among the plant outputs. The proposed controller is composed of two nested loops: one is devoted to the vertical stabilization, the other, designed using the /spl Hscr//sub /spl infin// technique, guarantees the control of the plasma current and of the plasma shape. After massive simulations, this controller has been successfully tested on the plant. The experimental results show a significant improvement of the performance with respect to those obtained with a proportional integral derivative (PID) MIMO controller, that was used before on the plant.

[1]  K. Lackner,et al.  Numerical study of displacement instability in elongated tokamak , 1974 .

[2]  P. Khargonekar,et al.  State-space solutions to standard H/sub 2/ and H/sub infinity / control problems , 1989 .

[3]  Alfredo Portone,et al.  Plasma current and shape control in tokamaks using H/sub /spl infin// and /spl mu/-synthesis , 1997, Proceedings of the 36th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[4]  J. B. Lister,et al.  A high-performance digital control system for TCV , 1998 .

[5]  J. Doyle,et al.  Essentials of Robust Control , 1997 .

[6]  Alfredo Portone,et al.  PLASMA CURRENT AND SHAPE CONTROL IN TOKAMAKS , 1997 .

[7]  Basil Kouvaritakis,et al.  Application of cautious stable predictive control to vertical positioning in COMPASS-D tokamak , 1999, IEEE Trans. Control. Syst. Technol..

[8]  李幼升,et al.  Ph , 1989 .

[9]  R. Albanese,et al.  The linearized CREATE-L plasma response model for the control of current, position and shape in tokamaks , 1998 .

[10]  J. B. Lister,et al.  The control of TCV plasmas , 1995 .

[11]  Jie Chen.  Sensitivity Integral Relations and Design Tradeoffs in Linear Multivariable Feedback Systems , 1993, 1993 American Control Conference.

[12]  J. B. Lister,et al.  The Control of Tokamak Configuration Variable Plasmas , 1997 .

[13]  B. Moore.  Principal component analysis in linear systems: Controllability, observability, and model reduction , 1981 .

[14]  Robert W. Conn,et al.  Linear Optimal Control of Tokamak Fusion Devices , 1990 .

[15]  Balas,et al.  [ z-analysis and Synthesis Toolbox * ( p-tools ) t , 2002 .

[16]  P. Khargonekar,et al.  STATESPACE SOLUTIONS TO STANDARD 2 H AND H? CONTROL PROBLEMS , 1989 .

[17]  Parag Vyas,et al.  VERTICAL POSITION CONTROL ON COMPASS-D , 1998 .

[18]  Alfredo Pironti,et al.  Plasma Current, Shape, and Position Control in ITER , 1996 .

[19]  Parag Vyas,et al.  Comparison of the CREATE-L plasma response model with TCV limited discharges , 1997 .

[20]  J. B. Lister,et al.  Can better modelling improve tokamak control? , 1997, Proceedings of the 36th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[21]  B. Montgomery,et al.  ITER-a world class challenge and opportunity , 1995, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[22]  Basil Kouvaritakis,et al.  Application of an adaptive algorithm to the control of the plasma vertical position , 1999 .

[23]  J. A. Leuer,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF MULTIVARIABLE CONTROL TECHNIQUES FOR USE WITH THE DIII-D PLASMA CONTROL SYSTEM , 1999 .

[24]  J. B. Lister,et al.  A Modern Plasma Controller Tested on the TCV Tokamak , 1999 .