Postemergence Weed Management Systems for Peanuts (Arachis hypogaea)

Field studies were conducted from 1985 to 1987 to evaluate postemergence herbicide systems with preemergence systems to control Texas panicum, Florida beggarweed, sicklepod, and pitted morningglory in peanuts. Adding paraquat at 0.14 kg ai/ha to postemergence herbicide systems reduced fresh weight of Florida beggarweed 92% (18% increase over the same systems without paraquat), sicklepod 95% (21% increase), and pitted morningglory 95% (11% increase). Herbicide systems containing paraquat improved peanut yields by 230 kg/ha and net returns by $52/ha over herbicide systems not containing paraquat. Fluazifop-P and sethoxydim systems reduced Texas panicum fresh weight (at least 96%) more than a preemergence system (92% reduction) that used benefin applied preplant incorporated and alachlor plus naptalam and dinoseb applied at cracking (GC) or a postemergence system that used alachlor and naptalam plus dinoseb GC and paraquat applied early postemergence (86% reduction). Systems containing fluazifop-P provided greater yields (4190 kg/ha) and net returns ($383/ha) than systems containing sethoxydim (4010 kg/ha, $305/ha) when averaged across all rates of application.

[1]  G. Wehtje,et al.  Postemergence Weed Control Systems Without Dinoseb for Peanuts (Arachis hypogaea) , 1989, Weed Science.

[2]  G. Wehtje,et al.  Economics of Weed Control in Peanuts (Arachis hypogaea) with Herbicides and Cultivations , 1987 .

[3]  D. C. Bridges,et al.  Economics of Sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) Management , 1987, Weed Science.

[4]  D. L. Colvin,et al.  Economic Assessment of Herbicide Systems for Minimum-Tillage Peanuts1 , 1987 .

[5]  M. Patterson,et al.  Economic Assessment of Weed Control Systems for Peanuts (Arachis bypogaea) , 1987 .

[6]  R. Frans,et al.  Economics and New Alternatives in Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) Weed Management Programs , 1986, Weed Science.

[7]  W. Grichar,et al.  Postemergence Grass Control in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea) , 1986, Weed Science.

[8]  M. Patterson,et al.  Texas Panicum (Panicum texanum) Control in Peanuts (Arachis hypogaea) with Paraquat , 1986, Weed Science.

[9]  D. L. Colvin,et al.  Weed Management in Minimum-Tillage Peanuts (Arachis hypogaea) as Influenced by Cultivar, Row Spacing, and Herbicides , 1985, Weed Science.

[10]  D. C. Bridges,et al.  Efficiency of Chemical and Mechanical Methods for Controlling Weeds in Peanuts (Arachis hypogaea) , 1984, Weed Science.

[11]  G. Buchanan,et al.  Efficacy and Economics of Weed Control Methods in Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) , 1984, Weed Science.

[12]  D. M. Porter,et al.  Peanut plant diseases. , 1982 .

[13]  K. Boote Growth Stages of Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)1 , 1982 .

[14]  D. Teem,et al.  Influence of seeding depth on control of Texas panicum. , 1980 .