An Approach to Scalable Multi-issue Negotiation: Decomposing the Contract Space Based on Issue Interdependencies

Most real-world negotiation involves multiple interdependent issues, which makes an agent's utility functions nonlinear. Traditional negotiation mechanisms, which were designed for linear utilities, do not fare well in nonlinear contexts. One of the main challenges in developing effective nonlinear negotiation protocols is scalability; they can produce excessively high failure rates, when there are many issues, due to computational intractability. One reasonable approach to reducing computational cost, while maintaining good quality outcomes, is to decompose the utility space into several largely independent sub-spaces. In this paper, we propose a method for decomposing a utility space based on four types of issue inter-dependencies. This method allows good outcomes with greater scalability than previous efforts. We also analyze how the types of issue interdependency influence the solution optimality and failure rate.

[1]  Koen V. Hindriks,et al.  Eliminating Interdependencies Between Issues for Multi-issue Negotiation , 2006, CIA.

[2]  Mark Klein,et al.  Negotiating Complex Contracts , 2003, AAMAS '02.

[3]  Lawrence M. Ausubel,et al.  Ascending Auctions with Package Bidding , 2002 .

[4]  Milind Tambe,et al.  Analysis of Privacy Loss in Distributed Constraint Optimization , 2006, AAAI.

[5]  Takayuki Ito,et al.  Common Testbed Generating Tool Based on XML for Multiple Interdependent Issues Negotiation Problems , 2011, J. Adv. Comput. Intell. Intell. Informatics.

[6]  Takayuki Ito,et al.  A preliminary result on a representative-based multi-round protocol for multi-issue negotiations , 2008, AAMAS.

[7]  Mark Klein,et al.  Harnessing Collective Intelligence to Address Global Climate Change , 2007, Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization.

[8]  Dongmo Zhang,et al.  LADDER: A Language to Describe Drawing, Display, and Editing in Sketch Recognition , 2009, IJCAI.

[9]  M E J Newman,et al.  Community structure in social and biological networks , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  Ivan Marsá-Maestre,et al.  Avoiding the prisoner's dilemma in auction-based negotiations for highly rugged utility spaces , 2010, AAMAS.

[11]  Valentin Robu,et al.  Modeling complex multi-issue negotiations using utility graphs , 2005, AAMAS '05.

[12]  Theodore Groves,et al.  Incentives in Teams , 1973 .

[13]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Using similarity criteria to make issue trade-offs in automated negotiations , 2002, Artif. Intell..

[14]  Takayuki Ito,et al.  A Secure and Fair Negotiation Protocol in Highly Complex Utility Space Based on Cone-Constraints , 2009, 2009 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology.

[15]  Kate Larson,et al.  The Blind Leading the Blind: A Third-Party Model for Bilateral Multi-issue Negotiations under Incomplete Information , 2009 .

[16]  H. L. Poutré,et al.  Constructing the Structure of Utility Graphs Used in Multi-Item Negotiation Through Collaborative Filtering of Aggregate Buyer Preferences , 2008 .

[17]  Milind Tambe,et al.  Valuations of Possible States (VPS): a quantitative framework for analysis of privacy loss among collaborative personal assistant agents , 2005, AAMAS '05.

[18]  Peter Norvig,et al.  Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach , 1995 .

[19]  Yutaka Nakamura,et al.  Decompositions of Multiattribute Utility Functions Based on Convex Dependence , 1983, Oper. Res..

[20]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Approximate and online multi-issue negotiation , 2007, AAMAS '07.

[21]  Ivan Marsá-Maestre,et al.  Effective bidding and deal identification for negotiations in highly nonlinear scenarios , 2009, AAMAS.

[22]  Hiromitsu Hattori,et al.  Multi-issue Negotiation Protocol for Agents: Exploring Nonlinear Utility Spaces , 2007, IJCAI.

[23]  Sarit Kraus,et al.  Strategic Negotiation in Multiagent Environments , 2001, Intelligent robots and autonomous agents.

[24]  Christophe Labreuche,et al.  A new multilateral multi-issue negotiation protocol and its application to a crisis management problem , 2008, Multiagent Grid Syst..

[25]  Catholijn M. Jonker,et al.  An agent architecture for multi-attribute negotiation using incomplete preference information , 2007, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems.

[26]  Christophe Labreuche,et al.  A multilateral multi-issue negotiation protocol , 2007, AAMAS '07.

[27]  Takayuki Ito,et al.  Common Testbed Generating Tool Based on XML for Multiple Interdependent Issues Negotiation Problems , 2011 .

[28]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  An analysis of feasible solutions for multi-issue negotiation involving nonlinear utility functions , 2009, AAMAS.