The Effectiveness of Games for Educational Purposes: A Review of Recent Research

This article reviews the literature that compares the instructional effectiveness of games to conventional classroom instruction. Studies dealing with empirical research rather than teachers'judgments are reviewed. Published reviews of research in English dating from 1963 to 1984 were examined and the literature was searched for studies from 1984 to 1991. Of the 67 studies considered over a period of 28 years, 38 show no difference between games and conventional instruction; 22 favor games; 5 favor games, but their controls are questionable; and 3 favor conventional instruction. Results for social sciences, math, language arts, logic physics, biology, retention over time, and interest are examined. Math is the subject area with the greatest percentage of results favoring games, but only eight studies have adequate controls. Thirty-three out of 46 social science games/simulations show no difference between games/simulations and classroom instruction. The authors conclude that subject matter areas where very specific content can be targeted are more likely to show beneficial effects for gaming.

[1]  Alan J. Watson.  Developmental Spelling: A Word Categorizing Instructional Experiment , 1988 .

[2]  Layman E. Allen,et al.  Instructional gaming as a means to achieve skill in selecting ideas relevant for solving a problem , 1975 .

[3]  Robert F. Szafran,et al.  Test Performance and Concept Recognition , 1980 .

[4]  William H. Kraus.  Using a Computer Game to Reinforce Skills in Addition Basic Facts in Second Grade , 1981 .

[5]  Barbara Y. White,et al.  Designing Computer Games to Help Physics Students Understand Newton's Laws of Motion , 1984 .

[6]  John W. Fraas,et al.  The Use of Seven Simulation Games in a College Economics Course , 1980 .

[7]  Robert H. Bradley,et al.  Simulation Games, Learning, and Retention , 1978, The Elementary School Journal.

[8]  Richard J. Butler,et al.  Where are we? , 1988 .

[9]  Thomas W. Malone,et al.  Toward a Theory of Intrinsically Motivating Instruction , 1981, Cogn. Sci..

[10]  Valerie J. Shute,et al.  A Large-Scale Evaluation of an Intelligent Discovery World: Smithtown , 1990, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[11]  William Remus,et al.  Experimental Designs for Analyzing Data On Games , 1981 .

[12]  David A. Pierfy.  Comparative Simulation Game Research , 1977 .

[13]  Layman E. Allen,et al.  What Counts is How the Game is Scored , 1978 .

[14]  Chen-Lin C. Kulik,et al.  Review of recent research literature on computer-based instruction , 1987 .

[15]  M. Bredemeier,et al.  The Educational Effectiveness of Simulation Games , 1981 .

[16]  Donald R. Cruickshank,et al.  Classroom games and simulations , 1980 .

[17]  Leon H. Nawrocki,et al.  Video Games: Instructional Potential and Classification , 1983 .

[18]  J. Wolfe.  The Teaching Effectiveness of Games in Collegiate Business Courses , 1985 .

[19]  James D. Klein,et al.  Effects of Using an Instructional Game on Motivation and Performance , 1991 .

[20]  Robert E. Rowsey,et al.  The Effect of Simulation Games and Worksheets on Learning of Varying Ability Groups in a High School Biology Classroom. , 1986 .

[21]  Ronald L. Vansickle.  A Quantitative Review of Research on Instructional Simulation Gaming: A Twenty-Year Perspective , 1986 .

[22]  Cleo H. Cherryholmes.  Some Current Research On Effectiveness of Educational Simulations: Implications for Alternative Strategies , 1966 .

[23]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Designing structured hypertext and structuring access to hypertext , 1988 .

[24]  D. Malouf.  THE EFFECT OF INSTRUCTIONAL COMPUTER GAMES ON CONTINUING STUDENT MOTIVATION , 1988 .

[25]  Herbert J. Rieth,et al.  The effects of instructional computer games and drill and practice software on learning disabled students' mathematics achievement , 1990 .

[26]  Mark A. Davis,et al.  A Multidimensional Scaling of Video Games , 1984 .

[27]  Marley W. Watkins,et al.  Microcomputer-Based Math Instruction with First-Grade Students , 1986 .