Construction and validation of image-based statistical shape and intensity models of bone

Three-dimensional models of bone structures, inferred from 3D and 2D imaging modalities, provide a number of uses for medical professionals. Such models are typically constructed using mesh-based approaches and some form of principal component analysis (PCA). Image-based approaches are understood to have a number of advantages over mesh-based ones, such as the absence of intrinsic segmentation as well as a better reproduction fidelity. Furthermore, Gaussian process morphable models have recently been shown to offer added benefits to the traditional PCA-based approach, such as the ability to easily incorporate prior knowledge into the model, and a resolution that can be made application-specific. We demonstrate how to build an image-based statistical shape and intensity model (SSIM) using Gaussian process morphable models and validate the quality of the model using common mesh model metrics that we adapt to the image-based paradigm. Our results show that the model can generate valid novel femur examples and can be registered to unseen femur examples with average root mean square error and average mutual information score of 0.172 and 0.644, respectively. However, only twenty binary training examples are used, each limited to contain approximately 65000 voxels. Future work will aim at extending the image-based SSIM to include the full range of CT intensity values; larger CT volumes and improve on the model building time.

[1]  Guoyan Zheng,et al.  Statistical shape model-based reconstruction of a scaled, patient-specific surface model of the pelvis from a single standard AP x-ray radiograph. , 2010, Medical physics.

[2]  W. Eric L. Grimson,et al.  2D-3D rigid registration of X-ray fluoroscopy and CT images using mutual information and sparsely sampled histogram estimators , 2001, Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2001.

[3]  Prasanth B. Nair,et al.  Statistical modelling of the whole human femur incorporating geometric and material properties. , 2010, Medical engineering & physics.

[4]  Marco Viceconti,et al.  Evaluation of the generality and accuracy of a new mesh morphing procedure for the human femur. , 2011, Medical engineering & physics.

[5]  Russell H. Taylor,et al.  Statistical Atlases of Bone Anatomy: Construction, Iterative Improvement and Validation , 2007, MICCAI.

[6]  Tim Cootes,et al.  Detection of vertebral fractures in DXA VFA images using statistical models of appearance and a semi-automatic segmentation , 2010, Osteoporosis International.

[7]  Russell H. Taylor,et al.  Construction and simplification of bone density models , 2001, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[8]  Nikos Paragios,et al.  Deformable Medical Image Registration: A Survey , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[9]  Cedric Schwartz,et al.  An Automated Statistical Shape Model Developmental Pipeline: Application to the Human Scapula and Humerus , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  R. Aspden,et al.  Femoral geometry as a risk factor for osteoporotic hip fracture in men and women. , 2008, Medical engineering & physics.

[11]  Agnes Grünerbl,et al.  3D image segmentation using combined shape-intensity prior models , 2007, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[12]  Bostjan Likar,et al.  A review of 3D/2D registration methods for image-guided interventions , 2012, Medical Image Anal..

[13]  Thomas Gerig,et al.  Gaussian Process Morphable Models , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[14]  João Manuel R S Tavares,et al.  Medical image registration: a review , 2014, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[15]  A. A. Zadpoor,et al.  Statistical shape and appearance models of bones. , 2014, Bone.

[16]  Mauricio Reyes,et al.  Image-based vs. mesh-based statistical appearance models of the human femur: implications for finite element simulations. , 2014, Medical engineering & physics.

[17]  Martin Styner,et al.  Evaluation of 3D Correspondence Methods for Model Building , 2003, IPMI.

[18]  Guoyan Zheng Personalized X-Ray Reconstruction of the Proximal Femur via Intensity-Based Non-rigid 2D-3D Registration , 2011, MICCAI.