Horse–Rider Interaction: A New Method Based on Inertial Measurement Units

Abstract Effective horse–rider interactions are a key component of good horse riding regardless of equestrian discipline, but they remain poorly understood in terms of quantifying. The aim of this study was to assess and describe factors of interaction in the rider–horse system at different skill levels for walk, sitting trot, and canter based on the inertial measurement technique. Horse–rider interaction was defined in terms of the time lag of cross‐correlation between specific parameters of rider and horse: the smaller the time lag, the better the horse–rider interaction. Ten high level professional riders (PROs) and 10 beginners (BEGs) participated in this study. Based on simultaneous acceleration data and segment angles of rider’s segments (pelvis and trunk) and horse’s trunk, cross‐correlation analysis was used to quantitatively evaluate the interaction for the factors gaits and skill level. The results indicate significant differences in interaction in the various equine gaits. Furthermore, the results of cross‐correlation analysis suggest a better horse–rider interaction in roll (sagittal plane) than in pitch (frontal plane), regardless of the investigated skill levels and gaits. However, no significant differences were found between the two examined skill levels after multivariate analysis of variance (Bonferroni post hoc test). The factor skill level showed only statistical tendencies between the interaction of horse’s trunk and the rider’s pelvis. This study demonstrates the potential of a novel method to determine and characterize the interaction between horse and rider under field conditions. Such quantitative information can be very useful for judges, horsemen, and trainers. HighlightsThis study demonstrates the potential of a novel method to determine interaction between horse and rider under field conditions.Due to recent efforts in sensor technology, it is possible to investigate the kinematics and the interactions of the horse and the rider using small wireless sensors.Cross‐correlation analysis was used to quantitatively evaluate the horse–rider interactions for different gaits and skill levels.The results indicate significant differences in horse–rider interaction between the different equine gaits.The factor skill level showed only statistical tendencies.

[1]  M. Weishaupt,et al.  Differences in rider movement pattern between different degrees of collection at the trot in high-level dressage horses ridden on a treadmill. , 2015, Human movement science.

[2]  Mari Zetterqvist Blokhuis,et al.  Assessing the Rider's Seat and Horse's Behavior: Difficulties and Perspectives , 2008, Journal of applied animal welfare science : JAAWS.

[3]  John H. Challis,et al.  A Procedure for the Automatic Determination of Filter Cutoff Frequency for the Processing of Biomechanical Data , 1999 .

[4]  Kerstin Witte,et al.  Horse-rider interaction in dressage riding. , 2014, Human movement science.

[5]  W I Schöllhorn,et al.  A pattern recognition approach for the quantification of horse and rider interactions. , 2006, Equine veterinary journal. Supplement.

[6]  R. Bartlett,et al.  Research design and statistics in biomechanics and motor control , 2001, Journal of sports sciences.

[7]  Robert Hogg,et al.  A preliminary investigation of the use of inertial sensing technology for the measurement of hip rotation asymmetry in horse riders , 2014 .

[8]  H. Clayton The rider’s interaction with the horse , 2011 .

[9]  Debbie Symes,et al.  A preliminary study into rider asymmetry within equitation. , 2009, Veterinary journal.

[10]  B M Nigg,et al.  Identification of individual walking patterns using time discrete and time continuous data sets. , 2002, Gait & posture.

[11]  M. Laurent,et al.  Patterns of Horse-Rider Coordination during Endurance Race: A Dynamical System Approach , 2013, PloS one.

[12]  Kayo Terada,et al.  Comparison of Head Movement and EMG Activity of Muscles between Advanced and Novice Horseback Riders at Different Gaits , 2000 .

[13]  Tao Liu,et al.  Gait Analysis Using Wearable Sensors , 2012, Sensors.

[14]  Christian Peham,et al.  A new method to quantify harmony of the horse–rider system in dressage , 2001 .

[15]  Jurjen Bosga,et al.  Coordination dynamics in horse-rider dyads. , 2013, Human movement science.

[16]  Kerstin Witte,et al.  A Preliminary Study of an Inertial Sensor-based Method for the Assessment of Human Pelvis Kinematics in Dressage Riding , 2013 .

[17]  Thilo Pfau,et al.  A method for deriving displacement data during cyclical movement using an inertial sensor , 2005, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[18]  S. Poonguzhali,et al.  Gait Analysis Using Wearable MEMS Tri-Axial Accelerometer System , 2014 .

[19]  E. Gloria,et al.  Analysis of trotter gait on the track by accelerometry and image analysis. , 2010, Equine veterinary journal. Supplement.

[20]  L. Chèze,et al.  Effect of the rider position during rising trot on the horse׳s biomechanics (back and trunk kinematics and pressure under the saddle). , 2016, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  Nancy Greer,et al.  Kinematic analysis of the equestrian — Walk, posting trot and sitting trot , 1993 .

[22]  B. Auvinet,et al.  Stride characteristics of overground versus treadmill locomotion in the saddle horse. , 1993, Acta anatomica.

[23]  H M Clayton,et al.  Comparison of the stride kinematics of the collected, working, medium and extended trot in horses. , 1994, Equine veterinary journal.

[24]  E. Barrey,et al.  Components of the total kinetic moment in jumping horses. , 2010, Equine veterinary journal. Supplement.

[25]  C. Peham,et al.  Coordination Dynamics of the Horse-Rider System , 2005, Journal of motor behavior.

[26]  A. Schache,et al.  Three-dimensional angular kinematics of the lumbar spine and pelvis during running. , 2002, Human movement science.

[27]  Woon-Yong Oh,et al.  Comparative analyses of rider position according to skill levels during walk and trot in Jeju horse. , 2010, Human movement science.

[28]  Emma F. Hodson-Tole,et al.  A preliminary investigation of rider position during walk, trot and canter , 2005 .

[29]  Yi Zhao,et al.  Sensing Movement: Microsensors for Body Motion Measurement , 2011, Sensors.

[30]  C. Assaiante,et al.  A statistical approach to sensorimotor strategies: conjugate cross-correlations. , 1994, Journal of motor behavior.

[31]  S. Dyson,et al.  The horse-saddle-rider interaction. , 2013, Veterinary journal.

[32]  Kerstin Witte,et al.  Kinematic Analysis of the Rider According to Different Skill Levels in Sitting Trot and Canter , 2016 .

[33]  Kerstin Witte,et al.  Application of a Full Body Inertial Measurement System in Dressage Riding , 2014 .

[34]  Jack B. Kuipers,et al.  Quaternions and Rotation Sequences: A Primer with Applications to Orbits, Aerospace and Virtual Reality , 2002 .

[35]  Huosheng Hu,et al.  Use of multiple wearable inertial sensors in upper limb motion tracking. , 2008, Medical engineering & physics.

[36]  H. W. Merkens,et al.  Objective determination of ground contact of equine limbs at the walk and trot: comparison between ground reaction forces, accelerometer data and kinematics , 2010 .