Oligomeric protein structure networks: insights into protein-protein interactions

BackgroundProtein-protein association is essential for a variety of cellular processes and hence a large number of investigations are being carried out to understand the principles of protein-protein interactions. In this study, oligomeric protein structures are viewed from a network perspective to obtain new insights into protein association. Structure graphs of proteins have been constructed from a non-redundant set of protein oligomer crystal structures by considering amino acid residues as nodes and the edges are based on the strength of the non-covalent interactions between the residues. The analysis of such networks has been carried out in terms of amino acid clusters and hubs (highly connected residues) with special emphasis to protein interfaces.ResultsA variety of interactions such as hydrogen bond, salt bridges, aromatic and hydrophobic interactions, which occur at the interfaces are identified in a consolidated manner as amino acid clusters at the interface, from this study. Moreover, the characterization of the highly connected hub-forming residues at the interfaces and their comparison with the hubs from the non-interface regions and the non-hubs in the interface regions show that there is a predominance of charged interactions at the interfaces. Further, strong and weak interfaces are identified on the basis of the interaction strength between amino acid residues and the sizes of the interface clusters, which also show that many protein interfaces are stronger than their monomeric protein cores. The interface strengths evaluated based on the interface clusters and hubs also correlate well with experimentally determined dissociation constants for known complexes. Finally, the interface hubs identified using the present method correlate very well with experimentally determined hotspots in the interfaces of protein complexes obtained from the Alanine Scanning Energetics database (ASEdb). A few predictions of interface hot spots have also been made based on the results obtained from this analysis, which await experimental verification.ConclusionThe construction and analysis of oligomeric protein structure networks and their comparison with monomeric protein structure networks provide insights into protein association. Further, the interface hubs identified using the present method can be effective targets for interface de-stabilizing mutations. We believe this analysis will significantly enhance our knowledge of the principles behind protein association and also aid in protein design.

[1]  Sandor Vajda,et al.  CAPRI: A Critical Assessment of PRedicted Interactions , 2003, Proteins.

[2]  Saraswathi Vishveshwara,et al.  Identification of domains and domain interface residues in multidomain proteins from graph spectral method , 2005, Proteins.

[3]  A. Giuliani,et al.  A computational approach identifies two regions of Hepatitis C Virus E1 protein as interacting domains involved in viral fusion process , 2009, BMC Structural Biology.

[4]  Luhua Lai,et al.  Structure-based method for analyzing protein–protein interfaces , 2004, Journal of molecular modeling.

[5]  S. Vishveshwara,et al.  A network representation of protein structures: implications for protein stability. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[6]  Kathryn Fraughnaugh,et al.  Introduction to graph theory , 1973, Mathematical Gazette.

[7]  S. Vishveshwara,et al.  Stabilizing interactions in the dimer interface of α‐subunit in Escherichia coli RNA polymerase: A graph spectral and point mutation study , 2001, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[8]  J. Janin,et al.  Protein-protein recognition. , 1995, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[9]  N. Ben-Tal,et al.  Residue frequencies and pairing preferences at protein–protein interfaces , 2001, Proteins.

[10]  S. Jones,et al.  Analysis of protein-protein interaction sites using surface patches. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[11]  A. Atilgan,et al.  Small-world communication of residues and significance for protein dynamics. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[12]  H. Wolfson,et al.  Shape complementarity at protein–protein interfaces , 1994, Biopolymers.

[13]  Ariel Fernández,et al.  Insufficiently dehydrated hydrogen bonds as determinants of protein interactions , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  Saraswathi Vishveshwara,et al.  Short hydrogen bonds in proteins , 2005, The FEBS journal.

[15]  J. Thornton,et al.  Protein–protein interfaces: Analysis of amino acid conservation in homodimers , 2001, Proteins.

[16]  A. Fauci,et al.  Characterization of GP120 binding to CD4 and an assay that measures ability of sera to inhibit this binding. , 1988, Journal of immunology.

[17]  Cyrus Chothia,et al.  The accessible surface area and stability of oligomeric proteins , 1987, Nature.

[18]  Joao Antonio Pereira,et al.  Linked: The new science of networks , 2002 .

[19]  Victoria A. Higman,et al.  Uncovering network systems within protein structures. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[20]  S. Anderson,et al.  Alanine Point-Mutations in the Reactive Region of Bovine Pancreatic Trypsin Inhibitor: Effects on the Kinetics and Thermodynamics of Binding to β-Trypsin and α-Chymotrypsin† , 1996 .

[21]  Peter G Wolynes,et al.  Protein topology determines binding mechanism. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Protein–protein interactions: Structurally conserved residues distinguish between binding sites and exposed protein surfaces , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  S. Vishveshwara,et al.  Determinants of quaternary association in legume lectins , 2004, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[24]  S. Vishveshwara,et al.  Identification of side-chain clusters in protein structures by a graph spectral method. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[25]  M Caron,et al.  Alteration by Concanavalin A of the Slow Dissociable Component in the Human Growth Hormone-Receptor Interaction , 1986, Hormone and metabolic research = Hormon- und Stoffwechselforschung = Hormones et metabolisme.

[26]  A. Bogan,et al.  Anatomy of hot spots in protein interfaces. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[27]  H. Wolfson,et al.  Studies of protein‐protein interfaces: A statistical analysis of the hydrophobic effect , 1997, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[28]  J. Janin,et al.  Dissecting subunit interfaces in homodimeric proteins , 2003, Proteins.

[29]  J. Janin,et al.  Structural basis of macromolecular recognition. , 2002, Advances in protein chemistry.

[30]  D. Covell,et al.  A role for surface hydrophobicity in protein‐protein recognition , 1994, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[31]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Hot regions in protein--protein interactions: the organization and contribution of structurally conserved hot spot residues. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[32]  T. N. Bhat,et al.  The Protein Data Bank , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[33]  Kurt S. Thorn,et al.  ASEdb: a database of alanine mutations and their effects on the free energy of binding in protein interactions , 2001, Bioinform..

[34]  A. Valencia,et al.  Computational methods for the prediction of protein interactions. , 2002, Current opinion in structural biology.

[35]  N. Kannan,et al.  Analysis of homodimeric protein interfaces by graph-spectral methods. , 2002, Protein engineering.

[36]  M. Karplus,et al.  Three key residues form a critical contact network in a protein folding transition state , 2001, Nature.

[37]  F. Cohen,et al.  An evolutionary trace method defines binding surfaces common to protein families. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[38]  R. Nussinov,et al.  How similar are protein folding and protein binding nuclei? Examination of vibrational motions of energy hot spots and conserved residues. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[39]  J. Thornton,et al.  Structural characterisation and functional significance of transient protein-protein interactions. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[40]  Shoshana J. Wodak,et al.  Protein modules and protein-protein interaction , 2003 .

[41]  S. Anderson,et al.  Alanine point-mutations in the reactive region of bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor: effects on the kinetics and thermodynamics of binding to beta-trypsin and alpha-chymotrypsin. , 1996, Biochemistry.

[42]  S. Smith‐Gill,et al.  Magnitude of the hydrophobic effect at central versus peripheral sites in protein-protein interfaces. , 2005, Structure.

[43]  Antonio del Sol,et al.  Topology of small-world networks of protein?Cprotein complex structures , 2005, Bioinform..

[44]  M Karplus,et al.  Small-world view of the amino acids that play a key role in protein folding. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[45]  Sarah A. Teichmann,et al.  Principles of protein-protein interactions , 2002, ECCB.

[46]  M. Sternberg,et al.  Prediction of protein-protein interactions by docking methods. , 2002, Current opinion in structural biology.

[47]  J M Thornton,et al.  Amino acid architecture and the distribution of polar atoms on the surfaces of proteins , 2005, Biopolymers.

[48]  E. Shakhnovich,et al.  Topological determinants of protein folding , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[49]  J. Janin,et al.  Dissecting protein–protein recognition sites , 2002, Proteins.

[50]  B. Rost,et al.  Analysing six types of protein-protein interfaces. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[51]  Frank Alber,et al.  A structural perspective on protein-protein interactions. , 2004, Current opinion in structural biology.

[52]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Hydrogen bonds and salt bridges across protein-protein interfaces. , 1997, Protein engineering.

[53]  D. Eisenberg,et al.  Three-dimensional cluster analysis identifies interfaces and functional residue clusters in proteins. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[54]  A. del Sol,et al.  Small‐world network approach to identify key residues in protein–protein interaction , 2004, Proteins.

[55]  C. Chothia,et al.  The atomic structure of protein-protein recognition sites. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[56]  J. Thornton,et al.  PQS: a protein quaternary structure file server. , 1998, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[57]  J. Janin,et al.  A dissection of specific and non-specific protein-protein interfaces. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[58]  D. Baker,et al.  A simple physical model for binding energy hot spots in protein–protein complexes , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[59]  M. Sternberg,et al.  Modelling protein docking using shape complementarity, electrostatics and biochemical information. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.