Divergence of alternative sugar preferences through modulation of the expression and activity of the Gal3 sensor in yeast

Optimized nutrient utilization is crucial for the progression of microorganisms in competing communities. Here we investigate how different budding yeast species and ecological isolates have established divergent preferences for two alternative sugar substrates: Glucose, which is fermented preferentially by yeast, and galactose, which is alternatively used upon induction of the relevant GAL metabolic genes. We quantified the dose-dependent induction of the GAL1 gene encoding the central galactokinase enzyme, and found that a very large diversification exists between different yeast ecotypes and species. The sensitivity of GAL1 induction correlates with the growth performance of the respective yeasts with the alternative sugar. We further define some of the mechanisms, which have established different glucose/galactose consumption strategies in representative yeast strains by modulating the activity of the Gal3 inducer. (1) Optimal galactose consumers, such as Saccharomyces bayanus, contain a hyperactive GAL3 promoter, sustaining highly sensitive GAL1 expression, which is not further improved upon repetitive galactose encounters. (2) Desensitized galactose consumers, such as S. cerevisiae Y12, contain a less sensitive Gal3 sensor, causing a shift of the galactose response towards higher sugar concentrations even in galactose experienced cells. (3) Galactose insensitive sugar consumers, such as S. cerevisiae DBVPG6044, contain an interrupted GAL3 gene, causing extremely reluctant galactose consumption, which however still is improved upon repeated galactose availability. In summary, different yeast strains and natural isolates have evolved galactose utilization strategies, which cover the whole range of possible sensitivities by modulating the expression and/or activity of the inducible galactose sensor Gal3.

[1]  A. Rokas,et al.  The evolution of the GALactose utilization pathway in budding yeasts. , 2021, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[2]  M. Proft,et al.  Capturing and Understanding the Dynamics and Heterogeneity of Gene Expression in the Living Cell , 2020, International journal of molecular sciences.

[3]  Michael Springer,et al.  Variation in the modality of a yeast signaling pathway is mediated by a single regulator , 2020, bioRxiv.

[4]  R. Schneider,et al.  The past determines the future: sugar source history and transcriptional memory , 2020, Current Genetics.

[5]  Kayla B. Lee,et al.  Polymorphisms in the yeast galactose sensor underlie a natural continuum of nutrient-decision phenotypes , 2017, bioRxiv.

[6]  P. J. Bhat,et al.  Multiple Conformations of Gal3 Protein Drive the Galactose-Induced Allosteric Activation of the GAL Genetic Switch of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2017, Journal of molecular biology.

[7]  Kaitlin F. Mitchell,et al.  Transcriptional rewiring over evolutionary timescales changes quantitative and qualitative properties of gene expression , 2016, eLife.

[8]  Rachel B. Brem,et al.  Polygenic evolution of a sugar specialization trade-off in yeast , 2016, Nature.

[9]  Dan S. Tawfik,et al.  Gal3 Binds Gal80 Tighter than Gal1 Indicating Adaptive Protein Changes Following Duplication. , 2016, Molecular biology and evolution.

[10]  Nicolas E. Buchler,et al.  Different Mechanisms Confer Gradual Control and Memory at Nutrient- and Stress-Regulated Genes in Yeast , 2015, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[11]  Michael Springer,et al.  Natural Variation in Preparation for Nutrient Depletion Reveals a Cost–Benefit Tradeoff , 2014, bioRxiv.

[12]  J. Thevelein,et al.  Nutrient sensing and signaling in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2014, FEMS microbiology reviews.

[13]  Ophelia S. Venturelli,et al.  Population Diversification in a Yeast Metabolic Program Promotes Anticipation of Environmental Shifts , 2014, bioRxiv.

[14]  Sander K. Govers,et al.  Different Levels of Catabolite Repression Optimize Growth in Stable and Variable Environments , 2014, PLoS biology.

[15]  M. Proft,et al.  The use of a real‐time luciferase assay to quantify gene expression dynamics in the living yeast cell , 2012, Yeast.

[16]  L. Joshua-Tor,et al.  The Gal3p transducer of the GAL regulon interacts with the Gal80p repressor in its ligand-induced closed conformation. , 2012, Genes & development.

[17]  R. J. Reece,et al.  Interplay of a Ligand Sensor and an Enzyme in Controlling Expression of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae GAL Genes , 2011, Eukaryotic Cell.

[18]  Anders Blomberg,et al.  Trait Variation in Yeast Is Defined by Population History , 2011, PLoS genetics.

[19]  C. Peterson,et al.  Dominant Role for Signal Transduction in the Transcriptional Memory of Yeast GAL Genes , 2010, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[20]  Venkat R. Pannala,et al.  Systems biology of GAL regulon in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2010, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine.

[21]  Kenneth H. Wolfe,et al.  Turning a hobby into a job: How duplicated genes find new functions , 2008, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[22]  B. Görke,et al.  Carbon catabolite repression in bacteria: many ways to make the most out of nutrients , 2008, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[23]  Jerome T. Mettetal,et al.  Stochastic switching as a survival strategy in fluctuating environments , 2008, Nature Genetics.

[24]  R. J. Reece,et al.  Galactose metabolism in yeast-structure and regulation of the leloir pathway enzymes and the genes encoding them. , 2008, International review of cell and molecular biology.

[25]  D. Tzamarias,et al.  A Yeast Catabolic Enzyme Controls Transcriptional Memory , 2007, Current Biology.

[26]  Sean B. Carroll,et al.  Gene duplication and the adaptive evolution of a classic genetic switch , 2007, Nature.

[27]  S. Lindquist,et al.  A suite of Gateway® cloning vectors for high‐throughput genetic analysis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2007, Yeast.

[28]  C. Peterson,et al.  SWI/SNF is required for transcriptional memory at the yeast GAL gene cluster. , 2007, Genes & development.

[29]  Yvonne N Fondufe-Mittendorf,et al.  H2A.Z-Mediated Localization of Genes at the Nuclear Periphery Confers Epigenetic Memory of Previous Transcriptional State , 2007, PLoS biology.

[30]  R. Schiestl,et al.  High-efficiency yeast transformation using the LiAc/SS carrier DNA/PEG method , 2007, Nature Protocols.

[31]  A. Traven,et al.  Yeast Gal4: a transcriptional paradigm revisited , 2006, EMBO reports.

[32]  U. Alon,et al.  Optimality and evolutionary tuning of the expression level of a protein , 2005, Nature.

[33]  K. Gross,et al.  Hidden sources of galactose in the environment , 2005, European Journal of Pediatrics.

[34]  G. Crabtree,et al.  Cell signaling can direct either binary or graded transcriptional responses , 2001, The EMBO journal.

[35]  Pamela A. Silver,et al.  Regulated nucleo/cytoplasmic exchange of HOG1 MAPK requires the importin β homologs NMD5 and XPO1 , 1998, The EMBO journal.

[36]  Adam Platt,et al.  The yeast galactose genetic switch is mediated by the formation of a Gal4p–Gal80p–Gal3p complex , 1998, The EMBO journal.

[37]  J. Gancedo Yeast Carbon Catabolite Repression , 1998, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.

[38]  T. Fukasawa,et al.  Galactose-dependent reversible interaction of Gal3p with Gal80p in the induction pathway of Gal4p-activated genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  D. Lohr,et al.  Transcriptional regulation in the yeast GAL gene family: a complex genetic network , 1995, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[40]  M. Johnston,et al.  Multiple mechanisms provide rapid and stringent glucose repression of GAL gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1994, Molecular and cellular biology.

[41]  H. Ronne,et al.  Importance of a flanking AT-rich region in target site recognition by the GC box-binding zinc finger protein MIG1 , 1994, Molecular and cellular biology.

[42]  P. J. Bhat,et al.  Overproduction of the GAL1 or GAL3 protein causes galactose-independent activation of the GAL4 protein: evidence for a new model of induction for the yeast GAL/MEL regulon , 1992, Molecular and cellular biology.

[43]  Michael Carey,et al.  DNA recognition by GAL4: structure of a protein-DNA complex , 1992, Nature.

[44]  H. Ronne,et al.  Control of yeast GAL genes by MIG1 repressor: a transcriptional cascade in the glucose response. , 1991, The EMBO journal.

[45]  A. Wheals,et al.  Controlling the growth rate of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells using the glucose analogue D-glucosamine. , 1989, Journal of general microbiology.

[46]  M. Johnston A model fungal gene regulatory mechanism: the GAL genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1987, Microbiological reviews.

[47]  S. Johnston,et al.  Interaction of positive and negative regulatory proteins in the galactose regulon of yeast , 1987, Cell.

[48]  M. Ptashne,et al.  The carboxy-terminal 30 amino acids of GAL4 are recognized by GAL80 , 1987, Cell.

[49]  S. Johnston,et al.  Isolation of the yeast regulatory gene GAL4 and analysis of its dosage effects on the galactose/melibiose regulon. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.