Numerical modeling of pacemaker interference in the electric-utility environment

Potential for electromagnetic interference (EMI) with cardiac pacemakers in workplaces in electric utilities due to 50- and 60-Hz fields is well known. Only younger employees of electric-utility companies may want to return to their jobs that often entail exposure to such fields. EMI may occur due to exposure to strong external electric fields, magnetic fields, contact currents, and electrostatic discharges (ESD). Numerical modeling of the potential differences produced between the pacemaker electrodes in situ, i.e., in the heterogeneous model of a human body, allows for the evaluation of potential EMI prior to an implantation of the device. Such modeling has been performed and the results are presented and compared for different conditions of potential EMI. As expected, unipolar pacemakers are more susceptible than bipolar devices.

[1]  M. Stuchly,et al.  Interaction of low-frequency electric and magnetic fields with the human body , 2000, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[2]  A. Camm,et al.  The Response of Implanted Dual Chamber Pacemakers to 50 Hz Extraneous Electrical Interference , 1993, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[3]  Robert Kavet,et al.  Magnetic Field Exposures in the Electric Utility Industry Relevant to Occupational Guideline Levels , 1997 .

[4]  W Irnich,et al.  Interference in Pacemakers , 1984, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[5]  Maria A. Stuchly,et al.  Electric fields in the human body resulting from 60-Hz contact currents , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  Maria A. Stuchly,et al.  Pacemaker interference by 60-Hz contact currents , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  Maria A. Stuchly,et al.  Electric fields in the human body due to electrostatic discharges , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  Maria A. Stuchly,et al.  Pacemaker interference and low-frequency electric induction in humans by external fields and electrodes , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  A. Camm,et al.  The Effect of Power Frequency High Intensity Electric Fields on Implanted Cardiac Pacemakers , 1983, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[10]  T D Bracken,et al.  Magnetic-field exposures of cable splicers in electrical network distribution vaults. , 2001, Applied occupational and environmental hygiene.

[11]  A. Camm,et al.  The Effect of 50 Hz External Electrical Interference on Implanted Cardiac Pacemakers , 1988, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[12]  R. Kavet,et al.  A portable meter for measuring low frequency currents in the human body , 2004, Bioelectromagnetics.

[13]  Maria A. Stuchly,et al.  Pacemaker interference by magnetic fields at power line frequencies , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  Russell Senior,et al.  Evaluating Occupational 60-Hertz Electric-Field Exposures for Guideline Compliance , 2004, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[15]  B. Nowak,et al.  Cardiac output in single-lead VDD pacing versus rate-matched VVIR pacing. , 1995, The American journal of cardiology.

[16]  M. Okoniewski,et al.  Interactions of electrostatic discharge with the human body , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[17]  W. H. Bailey,et al.  Thresholds for 60 Hz magnetic field stimulation of peripheral nerves in human subjects , 2005, Bioelectromagnetics.