How Taxonomic and Thematic Associations in Semantic Memory Modulate Recall in Young Through Old-Old Adults

The aim of the current study was to investigate how the taxonomic and thematic organization of semantic long-term memory affected the recall performance of adults and older participants on a complex semantic working memory (SWM) task. Taxonomic and thematic classification are the two main systems used to organize knowledge: taxonomic information is hierarchically structured and typically independent of space and time, whereas thematically grouped concepts are horizontal and strictly context-dependent. Generally, thematic connections (more intuitive and experience-based) are formed earlier in development, while taxonomic links (more abstract and logic-based) are acquired later. We set out to explore whether this developmental pattern reverses with age, hypothesizing that the more complex form of memory organization (i.e., taxonomic) would play a lesser role in facilitating recall in the old, whereas thematic organization would be better preserved. Participants (aged 18 to 85 years) were asked to recall 60 words in sets of increasing span; the words were featured in lists organized to force a taxonomic association, a thematic association, or no semantic association. The results clearly showed that task accuracy varied more across age groups for taxonomically linked items than for thematically linked ones.

[1]  Denise C. Park,et al.  Theories of Memory and Aging: A Look at the Past and a Glimpse of the Future , 2016, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[2]  A. Miyake,et al.  Models of Working Memory: Mechanisms of Active Maintenance and Executive Control , 1999 .

[3]  G. Kinsella,et al.  The episodic buffer and learning in early Alzheimer's disease , 2008, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[4]  R. Petersen Mild cognitive impairment as a diagnostic entity , 2004, Journal of internal medicine.

[5]  Randall W Engle,et al.  Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: a latent-variable approach. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[6]  C. Cornoldi,et al.  The role of working memory and updating in Coloured Raven Matrices performance in typically developing children , 2010 .

[7]  A. Baddeley Recent developments in working memory , 1998, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[8]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Semantic Cognition: A Parallel Distributed Processing Approach , 2004 .

[9]  D. Balota,et al.  Attempting to avoid false memories in the Deese/Roediger—McDermott paradigm: Assessing the combined influence of practice and warnings in young and old adults , 2004, Memory & cognition.

[10]  Elena Cavallini,et al.  Updating working memory: memory load matters with aging , 2017, Aging Clinical and Experimental Research.

[11]  R. Engle,et al.  The generality of working memory capacity: a latent-variable approach to verbal and visuospatial memory span and reasoning. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[12]  B. Carretti,et al.  Working memory and inhibition across the adult life-span. , 2008, Acta psychologica.

[13]  F. Craik,et al.  Age differences in recall and recognition , 1987 .

[14]  C. Cornoldi,et al.  CPM-Coloured Progressive Matrices. Standardizzazione italiana , 2008 .

[15]  R. De Beni,et al.  Decline in working memory updating through ageing: Intrusion error analyses , 2004, Memory.

[16]  B. Carretti,et al.  How semantic organisation influences primary school children’s working memory , 2017 .

[17]  J. Raven,et al.  Manual for Raven's progressive matrices and vocabulary scales , 1962 .

[18]  Charles Hulme,et al.  High- and low-frequency words are recalled equally well in alternating lists: Evidence for associative effects in serial recall , 2003 .

[19]  Direct and indirect assessments of memory for script-based narratives in young and older adults , 1992 .

[20]  Thomas M. Hess,et al.  Chapter Three Aging and Schematic Influences on Memory , 1990 .

[21]  Mitchell Rabinowitz,et al.  Organization and Information Retrieval. , 1983 .

[22]  J. Dumas,et al.  Age Differences in Updating Working Memory: Evidence from the Delayed-Matching-To-Sample Test , 2001 .

[23]  Lynn Hasher,et al.  Working Memory, Comprehension, and Aging: A Review and a New View , 1988 .

[24]  Steve Majerus,et al.  Verbal short-term memory reflects the sublexical organization of the phonological language network: Evidence from an incidental phonotactic learning paradigm , 2004 .

[25]  Cesare Cornoldi,et al.  Verbal and visuospatial working memory deficits in children with Down syndrome. , 2004, American journal of mental retardation : AJMR.

[26]  Caterina Artuso,et al.  Modulation of working memory updating: Does long-term memory lexical association matter? , 2015, Cognitive Processing.

[27]  K. McGregor,et al.  Conceptual organization at 6 and 8 years of age: evidence from the semantic priming of object decisions. , 2007, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[28]  M. Van der Linden,et al.  Age-related differences in updating working memory. , 1994, British journal of psychology.

[29]  J. Reznick,et al.  The Development of Contextual Categories , 1987 .

[30]  A. Baddeley Exploring the Central Executive , 1996 .

[31]  A. Baddeley The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory? , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[32]  P. Hoffman The meaning of ‘life’ and other abstract words: Insights from neuropsychology , 2015, Journal of neuropsychology.

[33]  Patricia A. Reuter-Lorenz,et al.  How Does it STAC Up? Revisiting the Scaffolding Theory of Aging and Cognition , 2014, Neuropsychology Review.

[34]  R. Cattell,et al.  Refinement and test of the theory of fluid and crystallized general intelligences. , 1966, Journal of educational psychology.

[35]  Richard P. Cooper,et al.  Is there a semantic system for abstract words? , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[36]  B. Benelli,et al.  The influence of categorical organization on verbal working memory. , 2011, The British journal of developmental psychology.

[37]  P. Ackerman,et al.  Working Memory and Intelligence : The Same or Different Constructs ? , 2005 .

[38]  J. Vivas,et al.  Semantic Memory Organization in Children and Young Adults , 2014 .

[39]  Andrew R. A. Conway,et al.  Working memory and retrieval: a resource-dependent inhibition model. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[40]  K. McDermott,et al.  Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. , 1995 .

[41]  R. Cattell,et al.  Age differences in fluid and crystallized intelligence. , 1967, Acta psychologica.

[42]  M. McAndrews,et al.  Semantic activation during memory encoding across the adult life span. , 1980, Journal of gerontology.

[43]  N. Cowan An embedded-processes model of working memory , 1999 .

[44]  P. Verhaeghen,et al.  Aging and verbal memory span: a meta-analysis. , 2005, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[45]  Nathan S. Rose,et al.  Memory encoding and aging: A neurocognitive perspective , 2012, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[46]  N. L. Bowles,et al.  Aging and retrieval of words in semantic memory. , 1985, Journal of gerontology.

[47]  T. Hess,et al.  Aging and memory for schematically vs taxonomically organized verbal materials. , 1993, Journal of gerontology.

[48]  R. Engle Working Memory Capacity as Executive Attention , 2002 .

[49]  Catherine Monnier,et al.  The semantic-similarity effect in children: influence of long-term knowledge on verbal short-term memory. , 2011, The British journal of developmental psychology.

[50]  M. Summers,et al.  Longitudinal deficits to attention, executive, and working memory in subtypes of mild cognitive impairment. , 2011, Neuropsychology.

[51]  How sublexical association strength modulates updating: Cognitive and strategic effects , 2018, Memory & cognition.

[52]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[53]  S. Folstein,et al.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. , 1975, Journal of psychiatric research.

[54]  A Comparison of Complementary and Taxonomic Utilization: Significance of the Dependent Measure , 1985 .