Emerging variation: determiner genitives and noun modifiers in English

This article discusses the emerging variation between determiner genitives and noun modifiers in Present-day English. Based on the results of corpus analyses and previous studies I show that this variation (1) was not present in earlier English, and (2) results from the fact that determiner genitives have come to be used with nouns low in animacy while noun modifiers have come to be used with nouns high in animacy (mainly) in the course of Modern English. This semantic shift (or rather ‘convergence’) of genitives and noun modifiers has helped to create contexts which are compatible with both determiner and classifier function, i.e. the functions typically expressed by determiner genitives and noun modifiers, respectively. The article complements earlier work on the gradience between s-genitive constructions and noun+noun constructions (Rosenbach, 2006a), providing fur-ther evidence for the claim that semantic overlap may give rise to constructional gradience.

[1]  Katharine Beals,et al.  The parasession on variation in linguistic theory , 1994 .

[2]  G. McKoon,et al.  A pragmatic analysis of so-called anaphoric islands , 1991 .

[3]  W. Labov,et al.  Constraints on the agentless passive , 1983, Journal of Linguistics.

[4]  David Denison,et al.  Gradience and linguistic change , 2001 .

[5]  Herbert Koziol.  Handbuch der englischen Wortbildungslehre , 1937 .

[6]  Kemp Malone,et al.  A History of Modern Colloquial English , 1937 .

[7]  飯島 周.  「会話の文法」に関する一考察 : Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written Englishの場合 , 1999 .

[8]  Sophia Ananiadou,et al.  On the definition of word , 2004, Machine Translation.

[9]  Anette Rosenbach,et al.  Genitive constructions in Early Modern English: new evidence from a corpus analysis , 2000 .

[10]  Kira Hall,et al.  General session and parasession on theoretical issues in language reconstruction : proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, February 18-20, 1989 , 1989 .

[11]  Guillaume Desagulier,et al.  Cognitive Arguments for a Fuzzy Construction Grammar , 2008 .

[12]  Anette Rosenbach,et al.  On the history of the s-genitive , 2000 .

[13]  J. Bresnan,et al.  The Gradience of the Dative Alternation , 2008 .

[14]  L. Brinton.  Grammaticalization versus lexicalization reconsidered: On thelateuse of temporal adverbs , 2002 .

[15]  L. Bauer.  When is a sequence of two nouns a compound in English? , 1998, English Language and Linguistics.

[16]  Ingo Plag,et al.  The variability of compound stress in English: structural, semantic, and analogical factors , 2006, English Language and Linguistics.

[17]  Marianne Hundt,et al.  New Zealand English Grammar – Fact or Fiction?: A corpus-based study in morphosyntactic variation , 1998 .

[18]  Bob Duckett,et al.  The Cambridge History of the English Language , 1999 .

[19]  R. Harald Baayen,et al.  Probabilistic approaches to morphology , 2003 .

[20]  A. Kroch.  Morphosyntactic Variation , 1997 .

[21]  C. T. Carr,et al.  Nominal compounds in Germanic , 1939 .

[22]  D. Denison.  Category Change and Gradience in the Determiner System , 2006 .

[23]  Howard Jackson,et al.  Introducing english grammar , 1986 .

[24]  Geoffrey Leech,et al.  Short term diachronic shifts in part-of-speech frequencies: a comparison of the tagged LOB and F-LOB corpora. , 2002 .

[25]  Anette Rosenbach.  Genitive variation in English , 2002 .

[26]  O. Jespersen.  A modern English grammar on historical principles , 1928 .

[27]  Hilary Chappell,et al.  Alienability, Inalienability and Nominal Classification , 1989 .

[28]  E. Battistella.  Markedness: The Evaluative Superstructure of Language , 1990 .

[29]  Juhani Klemola.  Dialect evidence for the loss of genitive inflection in English , 1997, English Language and Linguistics.

[30]  B. Aarts.  Modelling linguistic gradience , 2004 .

[31]  H. Hughes.  The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language , 2003 .

[32]  Anette Rosenbach,et al.  Genitive variation in English : conceptual factors in synchronic and diachronic studies , 2002 .

[34]  Heinz J. Giegerich,et al.  Compound or phrase? English noun-plus-noun constructions and the stress criterion , 2004, English Language and Linguistics.

[35]  Anette Rosenbach,et al.  Exploring constructions on the web: a case study , 2007 .

[36]  Jan Svartvik,et al.  A __ comprehensive grammar of the English language , 1988 .

[37]  A. Kemenade,et al.  The Handbook of the History of English , 2006 .

[38]  Douglas Biber,et al.  Historical shifts in modification patterns with complex noun phrase structures , 2002 .

[39]  Bengt Altenberg,et al.  The genitive v. the of-construction: A study of syntactic variation in 17th century English , 1982 .

[40]  G. Leech,et al.  The use of computer corpora in the textual demonstrability of gradience in linguistic categories. , 1994 .

[41]  A. Bammesberger,et al.  Problems of Old English lexicography : studies in memory of Angus Cameron , 1986 .

[42]  Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm.  Adnominal possession in the European languages: form and function , 2002 .

[43]  Jonathan Culpeper,et al.  History of English , 1997 .

[44]  Hansjakob Seiler,et al.  Possession : as an operational dimension of language , 1983 .

[45]  R. Raab-Fischer.  Löst der Genitiv die of-Phrase ab ? Eine korpusgestützte Studie zum Sprachwandel im heutigen English , 1995 .

[46]  Bert Cappelle,et al.  Particle placement and the case for "allostructions" , 2006 .

[47]  Anette Rosenbach,et al.  Descriptive genitives in English: a case study on constructional gradience , 2006, English Language and Linguistics.