Wetland Classification Using Multi-Source and Multi-Temporal Optical Remote Sensing Data in Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada

ABSTRACT Newfoundland and Labrador (NL) is the only province in Atlantic Canada that does not have a wetland inventory system. As a consequence, both classifying and monitoring wetland areas are necessary for wetland conservation and human services in the province. In this study, wetlands in 5 pilot sites, distributed across NL, were classified using multi-source and multi-temporal optical remote sensing images. The procedures involved the application of an object-based method to segment and classify the images. To classify the areas, 5 different machine learning algorithms were examined. The results showed that the Random Forest (RF) algorithm in combination with an object-based approach was the most accurate method to classify wetlands. The average producer and user accuracies of wetland classes considering all pilot sites were 68% and 73%, respectively. The overall classification accuracies, which considered the accuracy of all wetland and non-wetland classes varied from 86% to 96% across all pilot sites confirming the robustness of the methodology despite the biological, ecological, and geographical differences among the study areas. Additionally, we assessed the effects of the tuning parameters on the accuracy of results, as well as the difference between pixel-based and object-based methods for wetland classification in this study.

[1]  P. Gong,et al.  Object-based analysis and change detection of major wetland cover types and their classification uncertainty during the low water period at Poyang Lake, China , 2011 .

[2]  Lior Rokach,et al.  Ensemble-based classifiers , 2010, Artificial Intelligence Review.

[3]  C. Rubec,et al.  The Canadian Wetland Classification System , 2016 .

[4]  Ridha Touzi,et al.  Polarimetric Radarsat-2 wetland classification using the Touzi decomposition: case of the Lac Saint-Pierre Ramsar wetland , 2014 .

[5]  Xiaoguang Jiang,et al.  Comparison of artificial neural networks and support vector machine classifiers for land cover classification in Northern China using a SPOT-5 HRG image , 2012 .

[6]  Taskin Kavzoglu,et al.  A kernel functions analysis for support vector machines for land cover classification , 2009, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[7]  Ruiliang Pu,et al.  Object-based urban detailed land cover classification with high spatial resolution IKONOS imagery , 2011 .

[8]  C. Hopkinson,et al.  A Physically Based Terrain Morphology and Vegetation Structural Classification for Wetlands of the Boreal Plains, Alberta, Canada , 2016 .

[9]  Geoffrey J. Hay,et al.  How wetland type and area differ through scale: A GEOBIA case study in Alberta's Boreal Plains , 2012 .

[10]  Yun Zhang,et al.  A Combined Object-and Pixel-Based Image Analysis Framework for Urban Land Cover Classification of VHR Imagery , 2013 .

[11]  Fan Xia,et al.  Assessing object-based classification: advantages and limitations , 2009 .

[12]  Brian Brisco,et al.  The integration of optical, topographic, and radar data for wetland mapping in northern Minnesota , 2011 .

[13]  Richard A. Fournier,et al.  An object-based method to map wetland using RADARSAT-1 and Landsat ETM images: test case on two sites in Quebec, Canada , 2007 .

[14]  T. M. Lillesand,et al.  Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation , 1980 .

[15]  Ming Zhong,et al.  Object-Based Classification of Urban Areas Using VHR Imagery and Height Points Ancillary Data , 2012, Remote. Sens..

[16]  W. Mitsch,et al.  The value of wetlands: importance of scale and landscape setting. , 2000 .

[17]  Weifeng Li,et al.  Comparing Machine Learning Classifiers for Object-Based Land Cover Classification Using Very High Resolution Imagery , 2014, Remote. Sens..

[18]  Steven E. Franklin,et al.  A comparison of pixel-based and object-based image analysis with selected machine learning algorithms for the classification of agricultural landscapes using SPOT-5 HRG imagery , 2012 .

[19]  Vladimir Vapnik,et al.  Chervonenkis: On the uniform convergence of relative frequencies of events to their probabilities , 1971 .

[20]  Patricia Gober,et al.  Per-pixel vs. object-based classification of urban land cover extraction using high spatial resolution imagery , 2011, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[21]  Daniel McInerney,et al.  A comparative analysis of kNN and decision tree methods for the Irish National Forest Inventory , 2009 .

[22]  Matthieu Cord,et al.  Machine Learning Techniques for Multimedia: Case Studies on Organization and Retrieval , 2009, J. Electronic Imaging.

[23]  Arno Schäpe,et al.  Multiresolution Segmentation : an optimization approach for high quality multi-scale image segmentation , 2000 .

[24]  R. Polikar,et al.  Ensemble based systems in decision making , 2006, IEEE Circuits and Systems Magazine.

[25]  Stacy L. Ozesmi,et al.  Satellite remote sensing of wetlands , 2002, Wetlands Ecology and Management.

[26]  Xuezhi Feng,et al.  Object-oriented method for urban vegetation mapping using IKONOS imagery , 2010 .

[27]  Bahram Salehi,et al.  A Review of the Effectiveness of Spatial Information used in Urban Land Cover Classification of VHR Imagery , 2012 .

[28]  Ute Beyer,et al.  Remote Sensing And Image Interpretation , 2016 .

[29]  Mahesh Pal,et al.  Random forest classifier for remote sensing classification , 2005 .

[30]  Wei-Yin Loh,et al.  Classification and regression trees , 2011, WIREs Data Mining Knowl. Discov..

[31]  Thomas Blaschke,et al.  Geographic Object-Based Image Analysis – Towards a new paradigm , 2014, ISPRS journal of photogrammetry and remote sensing : official publication of the International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.

[32]  C. Dawes,et al.  Benthic marine algae , 1969 .

[33]  Andreas Schmitt,et al.  Wetland Monitoring Using the Curvelet-Based Change Detection Method on Polarimetric SAR Imagery , 2013 .

[34]  A. Troy,et al.  An object‐oriented approach for analysing and characterizing urban landscape at the parcel level , 2008 .

[35]  Thomas Blaschke,et al.  Object based image analysis for remote sensing , 2010 .