The Optimal Choice of Promotional Vehicles: Front-Loaded or Rear-Loaded Incentives?: Front-Loaded or Rear-Loaded Incentives?

We examine the key factors that influence a firm's decision whether to use front-loaded or rear-loaded incentives. When using price packs, direct mail coupons, FSI coupons or peel-off coupons, consumers obtain an immediate benefit upon purchase or afront-loaded incentive. However, when buying products with in-pack coupons or products affiliated with loyalty programs, promotion incentives are obtained on the next purchase occasion or later, i.e., arear-loaded incentive. Our analysis shows that the innate choice process of consumers in a market (variety-seeking or inertia) is an important determinant of the relative impact of front-loaded and rear-loaded promotions. While in both variety-seeking and inertial markets, the sales impact and the sales on discount are higher for front-loaded promotions than for rear-loaded promotions, from a profitability perspective, rear-loaded promotions may be better than front-loaded promotions. We show that in markets with high variety-seeking it is more profitable for a firm to rear-load, and in markets with high inertia it is more profitable to front-load. Model implications are verified using two empirical studies: (a) a longitudinal experiment (simulating markets with variety-seeking consumers and inertial consumers) and (b) market data on promotion usage. The data in both studies are consistent with the model predictions.

[1]  Aradhna Krishna,et al.  Short- or Long-Duration Coupons: The Effect of the Expiration Date on the Profitability of Coupon Promotions , 1999 .

[2]  Jagmohan S. Raju,et al.  The Effect of Package Coupons on Brand Choice: An Epilogue on Profits , 1996 .

[3]  Jagmohan S. Raju,et al.  The Effect of Package Coupons on Brand Choice , 1994 .

[4]  Peter S. Fader,et al.  Accounting for Heterogeneity and Nonstationarity in a Cross-Sectional Model of Consumer Purchase Behavior , 1993 .

[5]  Aradhna Krishna,et al.  Estimating the Effects of Higher Coupon Face Values on the Timing of Redemptions, the Mix of Coupon Redeemers and Purchase Quantity , 1992 .

[6]  B. Kahn,et al.  Market Share Response When Consumers Seek Variety , 1992 .

[7]  B. Kahn,et al.  Effects of Price Promotions on Variety-Seeking and Reinforcement Behavior , 1991 .

[8]  B. Kahn,et al.  Effects of Retraction of Price Promotions on Brand Choice Behavior for Variety-Seeking and Last-Purchase-Loyal Consumers , 1990 .

[9]  K. Bawa.  Modeling Inertia and Variety Seeking Tendencies in Brand Choice Behavior , 1990 .

[10]  Sunil Gupta.  Impact of Sales Promotions on when, what, and how Much to Buy , 1988 .

[11]  Barbara E. Kahn,et al.  Measuring Variety-Seeking and Reinforcement Behaviors Using Panel Data , 1986 .

[12]  L. McAlister,et al.  Using a Variety-Seeking Model to Identify Substitute and Complementary Relationships among Competing Products , 1985 .

[13]  J. Quelch,et al.  Consumer Promotions and the Acceleration of Product Purchases , 1985 .

[14]  Moshe Givon.  Variety Seeking Through Brand Switching , 1984 .

[15]  Abel P. Jeuland,et al.  Brand Choice Inertia as One Aspect of the Notion of Brand Loyalty , 1979 .

[16]  D. G. Morrison,et al.  The Effect of Nonhomogeneous Populations on Markov Steady-State Probabilities , 1971 .