Modeled and observed ozone sensitivity to mobile-source emissions in Mexico City

The emission characteristics of mobile sources in the Mexico City Metropolitan Area (MCMA) have changed significantly over the past few decades in response to emission control policies, advancements in vehicle technologies and improvements in fuel quality, among others. Along with these changes, concurrent non-linear changes in photochemical levels and criteria pollutants have been observed, providing a unique opportunity to understand the effects of perturbations of mobile emission levels on the photochemistry in the region using observational and modeling approaches. The observed historical trends of ozone (O 3 ), carbon monoxide (CO) and nitrogen oxides (NO x ) suggest that ozone production in the MCMA has changed from a low to a high VOC-sensitive regime over a period of 20 years. Comparison of the historical emission trends of CO, NO x and hydrocarbons derived from mobile-source emission studies in the MCMA from 1991 to 2006 with the trends of the concentrations of CO, NO x , and the CO/NO x ratio during peak traffic hours also indicates that fuel-based fleet average emission factors have significantly decreased for CO and VOCs during this period whereas NO x emission factors do not show any strong trend, effectively reducing the ambient VOC/NO x ratio. This study presents the results of model analyses on the sensitivity of the observed ozone levels to the estimated historical changes in its precursors. The model sensitivity analyses used a well-validated base case simulation of a high pollution episode in the MCMA with the mathematical Decoupled Direct Method (DDM) and the standard Brute Force Method (BFM) in the 3-D CAMx chemical transport model. The model reproduces adequately the observed historical trends and current photochemical levels. Comparison of the BFM and the DDM sensitivity techniques indicates that the model yields ozone values that increase linearly with NO x emission reductions and decrease linearly with VOC emission reductions only up to 30% from the base case. We further performed emissions perturbations from the gasoline fleet, diesel fleet, all mobile (gasoline plus diesel) and all emission sources (anthropogenic plus biogenic). The results suggest that although large ozone reductions obtained in the past were from changes in emissions from gasoline vehicles, currently significant benefits could be achieved with additional emission control policies directed to regulation of VOC emissions from diesel and area sources that are high emitters of alkenes, aromatics and aldehydes.

[1]  Yongtao Hu,et al.  Decoupled direct 3D sensitivity analysis for particulate matter (DDM-3D/PM) , 2006 .

[2]  M. Molina,et al.  Mexico City basin wind circulation during the MCMA-2003 field campaign , 2005 .

[3]  Douglas R. Lawson,et al.  Weekday vs. weekend ambient ozone concentrations : discussion and hypotheses with focus on Northern California , 1995 .

[4]  Fei Wu,et al.  Weekly patterns of México City's surface concentrations of CO, NO x , PM 10 and O 3 during 1986–2007 , 2008 .

[5]  Vega,et al.  Determination of motor vehicle profiles for non-methane organic compounds in the Mexico City metropolitan area , 1998, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[6]  M. Molina,et al.  Cleaning the Air: A Comparative Study , 2002 .

[7]  B. de Foy,et al.  Characterizing ozone production in the Mexico City Metropolitan Area: a case study using a chemical transport model , 2006 .

[8]  Violeta Mugica,et al.  Determination of Motor Vehicle Profiles for Non-Methane Organic Compounds in the Mexico City Metropolitan Area. , 1998, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[9]  A. M. Dunker,et al.  Efficient calculation of sensitivity coefficients for complex atmospheric models , 1981 .

[10]  G. Sosa,et al.  Measurements of VOCs in Mexico City(1992-2001) and evaluation of VOCs and CO in the emissions inventory , 2004 .

[11]  I. Schifter,et al.  Remote sensing study of emissions from motor vehicles in the Metropolitan Area of Mexico City. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.

[12]  James G. Wilkinson,et al.  Fast, Direct Sensitivity Analysis of Multidimensional Photochemical Models , 1997 .

[13]  I Schifter,et al.  Evaluation of the vehicle inspection/maintenance program in the Metropolitan Area of Mexico City. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.

[14]  G. Bishop,et al.  On-Road Remote Sensing of Vehicle Emissions in Mexico , 1997 .

[15]  Charles E. Kolb,et al.  Air quality in North America's most populous city - overview of the MCMA-2003 campaign , 2007 .

[16]  Luisa T Molina,et al.  Megacities and atmospheric pollution. , 2004, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[17]  Mehmet T. Odman,et al.  Nonlinearity in atmospheric response: A direct sensitivity analysis approach , 2004 .

[18]  Aron Jazcilevich,et al.  Locally induced surface air confluence by complex terrain and its effects on air pollution in the valley of Mexico , 2005 .

[19]  Armistead G Russell,et al.  High-order, direct sensitivity analysis of multidimensional air quality models. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.

[20]  J. Chow.  Introduction to the A&WMA 2004 Critical Review Megacities and Atmospheric Pollution , 2004 .

[21]  Ralph Morris,et al.  Particulate Matter Source Apportionment Technology (PSAT) in the CAMx Photochemical Grid Model , 2007 .

[22]  Greg Yarwood,et al.  The decoupled direct method for sensitivity analysis in a three-dimensional air quality model--implementation, accuracy, and efficiency. , 2002, Environmental science & technology.

[23]  Sasha Madronich,et al.  The Role of Solar Radiation in Atmospheric Chemistry , 1999 .

[24]  Armistead G Russell,et al.  Nonlinear response of ozone to emissions: source apportionment and sensitivity analysis. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[25]  Division on Earth.  Rethinking the Ozone Problem in Urban and Regional Air Pollution , 1992 .

[26]  R. Volkamer,et al.  Characterizing ozone production and response under different meteorological conditions in Mexico City , 2008 .

[27]  Timothy Martin,et al.  The daytime mixing layer observed by radiosonde, profiler, and lidar during MILAGRO , 2007 .

[28]  D. Hamby.  A review of techniques for parameter sensitivity analysis of environmental models , 1994, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[29]  M. Molina,et al.  Open-path Emission Factors Derived from DOAS and FTIR Measurements in the Mexico City Metropolitan Area , 2004 .

[30]  L. Molina.  Overview of MILAGRO/ INTEX-B Campaign , 2008 .

[31]  J. Seinfeld,et al.  Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From Air Pollution to Climate Change , 1997 .

[32]  G. Grell,et al.  A description of the fifth-generation Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale Model (MM5) , 1994 .

[33]  M. Molina,et al.  Air quality in the Mexico megacity : an integrated assessment , 2002 .

[34]  W. B. Knighton,et al.  Multi-model simulations of the impact of international shipping on atmospheric chemistry and climate in 2000 and 2030 , 2006 .

[35]  Mark S. Zahniser,et al.  Characterization of on-road vehicle emissions in the Mexico City Metropolitan Area using a mobile laboratory in chase and fleet average measurement modes during the MCMA-2003 field campaign , 2006 .