Vestibular loss disrupts control of head and trunk on a sinusoidally moving platform.

Twelve subjects, 6 bilateral vestibular-loss (3 well compensated and 3 poorly compensated) and 6 controls, attempted to maintain balance during anterior-posterior sinusoidal surface translation at 6 different frequencies. For frequencies <or= 0.25 Hz well compensated and control subjects rode the platform by fixing the head and upper-trunk with respect to the support surface, and for frequencies >or= 0.75 Hz, these subjects fixed their head/upper-trunk in space. Poorly compensated vestibular subjects showed large head and center of mass variability and were unable to balance at frequencies requiring a head fixed in space pattern. All vestibular subjects were less stable with vision than the controls. Without vision, vestibular subjects experienced more falls than the controls at all frequencies, with falls observed in 61% of the vestibular subjects trials and 16% of the control subjects trials. Vestibular information is important in stabilizing head and upper-trunk motion in space. Visual and somatosensory information can compensate, in part, for vestibular-loss. The results are discussed in light of models that characterize postural control in a vestibular/visual top-down and somatosensory bottom-up manner.

[1]  Fay B. Horak,et al.  The timing of galvanic vestibular stimulation affects responses to platform translation , 1999, Brain Research.

[2]  J. H. J. Allum,et al.  Interactions between vestibular and proprioceptive inputs triggering and modulating human balance-correcting responses differ across muscles , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[3]  Fay B. Horak,et al.  Transitions in a postural task: do the recruitment and suppression of degrees of freedom stabilize posture? , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[4]  T Mergner,et al.  Vestibular-neck interaction and transformation of sensory coordinates. , 1997, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[5]  E. Walsh,et al.  Standing man, slow rhythmic tilting, importance of vision. , 1973, Agressologie: revue internationale de physio-biologie et de pharmacologie appliquees aux effets de l'agression.

[6]  Antonio Nardone,et al.  Standing on a continuously moving platform: is body inertia counteracted or exploited? , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[7]  F. Horak,et al.  Emergence of postural patterns as a function of vision and translation frequency. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  Thomas Rosemeier,et al.  Interaction of vestibular, somatosensory and visual signals for postural control and motion perception under terrestrial and microgravity conditions—a conceptual model , 1998, Brain Research Reviews.

[9]  F B Horak,et al.  Effects of vestibular loss on head stabilization in response to head and body perturbations. , 1996, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[10]  T C Hain,et al.  Predicting control mechanisms for human head stabilization by altering the passive mechanics. , 1999, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.