Social Mobilization and Political Development

Social mobilization is a name given to an overall process of change, which happens to substantial parts of the population in countries which are moving from traditional to modern ways of life. It denotes a concept which brackets together a number of more specific processes of change, such as changes of residence, of occupation, of social setting, of face-to-face associates, of institutions, roles, and ways of acting, of experiences and expectations, and finally of personal memories, habits and needs, including the need for new patterns of group affiliation and new images of personal identity. Singly, and even more in their cumulative impact, these changes tend to influence and sometimes to transform political behavior. The concept of social mobilization is not merely a short way of referring to the collection of changes just listed, including any extensions of this list. It implies that these processes tend to go together in certain historical situations and stages of economic development; that these situations are identifiable and recurrent, in their essentials, from one country to another; and that they are relevant for politics. Each of these points will be taken up in the course of this paper. Social mobilization, let us repeat, is something that happens to large numbers of people in areas which undergo modernization, i.e., where advanced, non-traditional practices in culture, technology and economic life are introduced and accepted on a considerable scale. It is not identical, therefore, with this process of modernization as a whole, but it deals with one of its major aspects, or better, with a recurrent cluster among its consequences.

[1]  K. Deutsch,et al.  National Industrialization and the Declining Share of the International Economic Sector, 1890–1959 , 1961, World Politics.

[2]  S. Hoffmann Contemporary theory in international relations , 1960 .

[3]  K. Deutsch The Propensity to International Transactions , 1960 .

[4]  J. Coleman,et al.  The Politics of the Developing Areas , 1960, American Political Science Review.

[5]  I. Kravis,et al.  The income of nations , 1959 .

[6]  Lyle W. Shannon SOCIO-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND POLITICAL STATUS , 1959 .

[7]  Karl W. Deutsch,et al.  Political Community And The North Atlantic Area , 1958 .

[8]  D. Lerner The Passing of Traditional Society , 1958 .

[9]  E. Haas The Challenge of Regionalism , 1958, International Organization.

[10]  Lyle W. Shannon Is Level of Development Related to Capacity for Self-Government ? , 1958 .

[11]  A. Eckstein,et al.  World Commerce and Governments: Trends and Outlook. , 1956 .

[12]  K. Deutsch Shifts in the Balance of Communication Flows: A Problem of Measurement in International Relations , 1956 .

[13]  E. Haas Regionalism, Functionalism, and Universal International Organization , 1956, World Politics.

[14]  K. Deutsch,et al.  Nationalism and Social Communication , 1954 .

[15]  Karl Mannheim,et al.  Man and Society in an Age of Reconstruction: Studies in Modern Social Structure. , 1941 .

[16]  Rupert Emerson From empire to nation , 1960 .

[17]  Scientific,et al.  Basic facts and figures : international statistics relating to education, culture and mass communication , 1960 .

[18]  D. Rustow Politics and Westernization in the Near East , 1956 .