Problem Formulation and Solution Mechanisms: A Behavioral Study of Humanitarian Transportation Planning

type="main" xml:id="poms12496-abs-0001"> When dealing with urgent, ill-defined problems, such as rapidly evolving emergency situations, operations managers have little time for problem formulation or solution. While the mechanisms by which humans formulate and solve problems have been described, mechanisms for rapid, concurrent formulating and solving are not well understood. This study investigates these mechanisms through a field study of transportation planning in a humanitarian response setting. The findings show that the problem is solved through greedy search and formulated through sensemaking, in which search enables updates to an evolving problem formulation, and the formulation directs and limits the search process. This study explores the implications of these findings for the development of better problem formulation processes and problem-solving strategies for urgent and ill-defined operations management problems.

[1]  Marjorie A. Lyles,et al.  Organizational Problem Formulation: An Empirical Study. , 1980 .

[2]  S. Winter.  Understanding dynamic capabilities , 2003 .

[3]  Jenny W. Rudolph,et al.  The Dynamics of Action-Oriented Problem Solving: Linking Interpretation and Choice , 2009 .

[4]  R. Volkema,et al.  Natural language and the art and science of problem/opportunity formulation: a transportation planning case analysis , 2009, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[5]  Gérard P. Cachon,et al.  Decision Bias in the Newsvendor Problem with a Known Demand Distribution: Experimental Evidence.: Experimental Evidence. , 2000 .

[6]  Jonas Landgren,et al.  Supporting fire crew sensemaking enroute to incidents , 2005 .

[7]  K. Dirks,et al.  Microfoundations of strategic problem formulation , 2013 .

[8]  Christina Hobbs,et al.  When business is not as usual: Decision-making and the humanitarian response to the famine in South Central Somalia , 2012 .

[9]  R. Volkema.  Problem Formulation in Planning and Design , 1983 .

[10]  John R. Wilson,et al.  A New Model of Scheduling in Manufacturing: Tasks, Roles, and Monitoring , 2004, Hum. Factors.

[11]  Morgan Swink,et al.  Toward a Theory of Competencies for the Management of Product Complexity: Six Case Studies , 2008 .

[12]  Thomas Y. Choi,et al.  Renaissance of case research as a scientific method , 2014 .

[13]  T. R. Featheringham,et al.  On systemic problem solving and the error of the third kind , 1974 .

[14]  Frederick Betz,et al.  Dialectical Decision Theory: A Meta-Theory of Decision-Making , 1972 .

[15]  S. Maitlis,et al.  Sensemaking in Crisis and Change: Inspiration and Insights from Weick (1988) , 2010 .

[16]  Kenneth N. McKay,et al.  ‘Common sense’ realities of planning and scheduling in printed circuit board production , 1995 .

[17]  Elliot Bendoly,et al.  Behavior in operations management: Assessing recent findings and revisiting old assumptions , 2006 .

[18]  Ulrich Wilhelm Thonemann,et al.  Designing Buyback Contracts for Irrational but Predictable Newsvendors , 2011, Manag. Sci..

[19]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Making Fast Strategic Decisions In High-Velocity Environments , 1989 .

[20]  Andrew Neal,et al.  On-the-Fly Scheduling as a Manifestation of Partial-Order Planning and Dynamic Task Values , 2014, Hum. Factors.

[21]  J. Dowell,et al.  A case study of co-ordinative decision-making in disaster management , 2000, Ergonomics.

[22]  Jc Jan Fransoo,et al.  Action variety of planners: Cognitive load and requisite variety , 2006 .

[23]  A. Langley.  Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data , 1999 .

[24]  Juliet M. Corbin,et al.  Basics of Qualitative Research (3rd ed.): Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory , 2008 .

[25]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[26]  Gary E. Bolton,et al.  Learning-by-Doing in the Newsvendor Problem: A Laboratory Investigation of the Role of Experience and Feedback , 2008, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[27]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  The Structure of "Unstructured" Decision Processes , 1976 .

[28]  van Wouter Wezel,et al.  Coordination activities of human planners during rescheduling: case analysis and event handling procedure , 2011 .

[29]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[30]  A. Pettigrew.  Longitudinal Field Research on Change: Theory and Practice , 1990 .

[31]  K. Weick.  The Collapse of Sensemaking in Organizations: The Mann Gulch Disaster , 1993 .

[32]  D. Teece,et al.  The Dynamic Capabilities of Firms: an Introduction , 1994 .

[33]  John Paul MacDuffie,et al.  The Road to Root Cause: Shop-Floor Problem-Solving at Three Auto Assembly Plants , 1997 .

[34]  D. Teece.  Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance , 2007 .

[35]  E. Salas,et al.  Taking stock of naturalistic decision making , 2001 .

[36]  David Mendonça,et al.  A Cognitive Model of Improvisation in Emergency Management , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[37]  Max Stephenson,et al.  Making humanitarian relief networks more effective: operational coordination, trust and sense making. , 2005, Disasters.

[38]  Jonas Landgren,et al.  A study of emergency response work: patterns of mobile phone interaction , 2007, CHI.

[39]  David Mendonça,et al.  Decision support for improvisation in response to extreme events: Learning from the response to the 2001 World Trade Center attack , 2007, Decis. Support Syst..

[40]  Mei Li,et al.  Qualitative case studies in operations management: Trends, research outcomes, and future research implications , 2011 .