An oblique illusion modulated by visibility: non-monotonic sensory integration in orientation processing.

Orientation perception is known to be anisotropic, with cardinal axes (i.e., horizontal and vertical) being privileged. Indeed, orientation sensitivity is greater near the cardinals, and small deviations from cardinal axes may be illusorily perceived in an exaggerated manner. Here, we quantified this illusory deviation from the cardinals at various visibility levels, by having participants reproduce the orientation of oriented Gabor stimuli whose visibility was manipulated by duration and masking. We found, first, that participants could reproduce quite accurately the orientation of very brief stimuli presented at lowest visibility levels. Second, the magnitude of the deviation followed a non-monotonic pattern, being maximal for stimuli of intermediate visibility, and lower for both the lowest and highest visibility levels. Thus, orientation processing at lowest visibility levels is noisier but paradoxically more faithful to the physical input. This counterintuitive result suggests that categorical processing of sensory information depends on perceptual awareness.

[1]  D. Foster,et al.  Orientation contrast vs orientation in line-target detection , 1995, Vision Research.

[2]  Lamme Vaf,et al.  Why visual attention and awareness are different , 2003 .

[3]  Geraint Rees,et al.  Unconscious orientation processing depends on perceptual load. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[4]  R. Freeman,et al.  Oblique effect: a neural basis in the visual cortex. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  C. Furmanski,et al.  An oblique effect in human primary visual cortex , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[6]  J. Changeux,et al.  Opinion TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.10 No.5 May 2006 Conscious, preconscious, and subliminal processing: a testable taxonomy , 2022 .

[7]  Edouard Gentaz,et al.  The Reproduction of Vertical and Oblique Orientations in the Visual, Haptic, and Somatovestibular Systems , 2001, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[8]  R. Mansfield,et al.  Neural Basis of Orientation Perception in Primate Vision , 1974, Science.

[9]  Edward A. Essock,et al.  Oblique stimuli are seen best (not worst!) in naturalistic broad-band stimuli: a horizontal effect , 2003, Vision Research.

[10]  Martin J. Wainwright,et al.  Visual adaptation as optimal information transmission , 1999, Vision Research.

[11]  Nestor Matthews,et al.  The time course of the oblique effect in orientation judgments. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[12]  Konrad Paul Kording,et al.  Review TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.10 No.7 July 2006 Special Issue: Probabilistic models of cognition Bayesian decision theory in sensorimotor control , 2022 .

[13]  Gang Wang,et al.  Representation of cardinal contour overlaps less with representation of nearby angles in cat visual cortex. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  D. W. Heeley,et al.  Orientation acuity estimated with simultaneous and successive procedures. , 1992, Spatial vision.

[15]  J. Jastrow.  Studies from the University of Wisconsin: On the Judgment of Angles and Positions of Lines , 1892 .

[16]  S. Appelle.  Perception and discrimination as a function of stimulus orientation: the "oblique effect" in man and animals. , 1972, Psychological bulletin.

[17]  G. Westheimer.  Meridional anisotropy in visual processing: implications for the neural site of the oblique effect , 2003, Vision Research.

[18]  Kilho Shin,et al.  The effect of spatial attention on invisible stimuli , 2009, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[19]  Steven C Dakin,et al.  An oblique effect for local motion: psychophysics and natural movie statistics. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[20]  Emmanuel Dupoux,et al.  Partial Awareness Creates the “Illusion” of Subliminal Semantic Priming , 2004, Psychological science.

[21]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  The cognitive architecture for chaining of two mental operations , 2009, Cognition.

[22]  Edward A Essock,et al.  A horizontal bias in human visual processing of orientation and its correspondence to the structural components of natural scenes. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[23]  F. Campbell,et al.  The effect of orientation on the visual resolution of gratings , 1966, The Journal of physiology.

[24]  Bruce C. Hansen,et al.  Anisotropic local contrast normalization: The role of stimulus orientation and spatial frequency bandwidths in the oblique and horizontal effect perceptual anisotropies , 2006, Vision Research.

[25]  R. W. Kentridge,et al.  Spatial attention speeds discrimination without awareness in blindsight , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[26]  J. Wolfe,et al.  The role of categorization in visual search for orientation. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  J. Enns,et al.  What’s new in visual masking? , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[28]  Essa Yacoub,et al.  High-field fMRI unveils orientation columns in humans , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  Cécile Ballaz,et al.  La perception visuelle des orientations et« l'effet de l'oblique » , 2000 .

[30]  M. Sur,et al.  Stability of Cortical Responses and the Statistics of Natural Scenes , 2001, Neuron.

[31]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Attention Modulates Contextual Influences in the Primary Visual Cortex of Alert Monkeys , 1999, Neuron.

[32]  R. Blake,et al.  Dissociation of Neural Mechanisms Underlying Orientation Processing in Humans , 2009, Current Biology.

[33]  Ning Qian,et al.  The oblique effect depends on perceived, rather than physical, orientation and direction , 2005, Vision Research.

[34]  Vivien A. Casagrande,et al.  Unequal representation of cardinal vs. oblique orientations in the middle temporal visual area , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.