Formal and Empirical Issues in Optimality Theoretic Syntax

Theoretic Syntax edited by Peter Sells, published by CSLI Publications. ©2001 by CSLI Publications. All rights reserved. This text may be used and shared in accordance with the fair-use provisions of U.S. copyright law, and it may be archived and redistributed in electronic form, provided that this entire notice, including copyright information, is carried and provided that CSLI Publications is notified and no fee is charged for access. Archiving, redistribution, or republication of this text on other terms, in any medium, requires the consent of CSLI Publications. Formal and Empirical Issues in Optimality Theoretic Syntax edited by Peter Sells

[1]  David R. Dowty.  Thematic proto-roles and argument selection , 1991 .

[2]  Anna Siewierska,et al.  An overview of word order in Slavic languages , 1998 .

[3]  Alessandro Duranti,et al.  On the Object Relation in Bantu , 1982 .

[4]  Reinhard Blutner,et al.  Some Aspects of Optimality in Natural Language Interpretation , 2000, J. Semant..

[5]  Young-joo Kim,et al.  The syntax and semantics of Korean case : the interaction between lexical and syntactic levels of representation , 1990 .

[6]  Beatrice Primus.  The relative order of recipient and patient in the languages of Europe . , 1998 .

[7]  Ivan A. Sag,et al.  Syntactic Theory: A Formal Introduction , 1999, Computational Linguistics.

[8]  J. Stemberger,et al.  Optimality Theory , 2003 .

[9]  Jong-Bok Kim.  The grammar of negation * a lexicalist,. constraint-based perspective , 1995 .

[10]  Peter Sells,et al.  Alignment Constraints in Swedish Clausal Syntax , 2000 .

[11]  D. Lightfoot.  The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger , 1995 .

[12]  P. Smolensky.  The Initial State and 'Richness of the Base' in Optimality Theory , 1996 .

[13]  Kali C. Bahl.  A REFERENCE GRAMMAR OF HINDI, A STUDY OF SOME SELECTED TOPICS IN HINDI GRAMMAR. , 1967 .

[14]  Peter Sells,et al.  Constituent Ordering as Alignment , 1999 .

[15]  Madhu Gurtu.  Anaphoric relations in Hindi and English , 1992 .

[16]  Noam Chomsky.  A minimalist program for linguistic theory , 1992 .

[17]  Joan Bresnan,et al.  The Emergence of the Unmarked Pronoun:Chichewa Pronominals in OT , 2000 .

[18]  Anders Holmberg.  Word order variation in some European SVO languages: a parametric approach , 1998 .

[19]  Ash Asudeh,et al.  Linking, Optionality, and Ambiguity in Marathi , 2000 .

[20]  Peter Sells,et al.  Korean and Japanese morphology from a lexical perspective , 1995 .

[21]  Young-Suk Lee,et al.  Scrambling as case-driven obligatory movement , 1993 .

[22]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Phonology-semantics interaction in OT, and its acquisition* , 1999 .

[23]  Nayla Mohammed Yateem.  Issues in word order , 1997 .

[24]  Alan S. Prince,et al.  The emergence of the unmarked: Optimality in prosodic morphology , 1994 .

[25]  Gerhard Jäger,et al.  Some Notes on the Formal Properties of Bidirectional Optimality Theory , 2002, J. Log. Lang. Inf..

[26]  Patrick M. Farrell,et al.  Grammatical relations : a cross-theoretical perspective , 1990 .

[27]  Larry M. Hyman,et al.  Hierarchies of natural topic in Shona , 1974 .

[28]  Veena Dhar Dwivedi.  Syntactic dependencies and relative phrases in Hindi , 1994 .

[29]  Ki-Sun Hong,et al.  Argument selection and case marking in Korean , 1992 .

[30]  James Hye Suk Yoon,et al.  Ambiguity of government and the Chain Condition , 1996 .

[31]  Vijay Gambhir,et al.  SYNTACTIC RESTRICTIONS AND DISCOURSE FUNCTIONS OF WORD ORDER IN STANDARD HINDI , 1981 .

[32]  Anna Siewierska,et al.  Constituent order in the languages of Europe , 1998 .

[33]  John T. Maxwell,et al.  Formal issues in lexical-functional grammar , 1998 .

[34]  J. Bresnan.  Lexical-Functional Syntax , 2000 .

[35]  P. Boersma,et al.  Empirical Tests of the Gradual Learning Algorithm , 2001, Linguistic Inquiry.

[36]  Colin Wilson,et al.  Bidirectional optimization and the theory of anaphora , 2001 .

[37]  Charles Reiss,et al.  Formal and Empirical Arguments concerning Phonological Acquisition , 1998, Linguistic Inquiry.

[38]  Hanjung Lee,et al.  Optimization in Argument Expression and Interpretation: A Unified Approach , 2001 .

[39]  Jürgen Lenerz,et al.  Zur Abfolge nominaler Satzglieder im Deutschen , 1977 .

[40]  Hanjung Lee.  Markedness and Pronoun Incorporation , 2000 .

[41]  William D. Raymond,et al.  Optimality and Wh-Extraction , 1995 .

[42]  Tracy Holloway King.  Configuring topic and focus in Russian , 1995 .

[43]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Minimalist Program , 1992 .

[44]  Hee-Don Ahn.  Light verbs, VP-movement, negation and clausal architecture in Korean and English , 1991 .

[45]  W. Foley.  The Papuan Languages of New Guinea , 1986 .

[46]  Judith Aissen,et al.  Markedness and Subject Choice in Optimality Theory , 1999 .

[47]  M. Saito.  Long distance scrambling in Japanese , 1992 .

[48]  Hye-Won Choi,et al.  Optimizing structure in context: scrambling and information structure , 1996 .

[49]  Explaining Morphosyntactic Competition,et al.  Explaining Morphosyntactic Competition , 2001 .

[50]  Veneeta Srivastav.  WH dependencies in Hindi and the theory of grammar , 1991 .

[51]  Joan Bresnan,et al.  Locative inversion in Chichewa: a case study of factorization in grammar , 1989 .

[52]  Ivan A. Sag,et al.  Book Reviews: Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar and German in Head-driven Phrase-structure Grammar , 1996, CL.

[53]  Peter Sells,et al.  Structure, Alignment and Optimality in Swedish , 2001 .

[54]  Jonas Kuhn,et al.  Two ways of formalizing OT Syntax in the LFG framework , 1999 .

[55]  Peter Ackema,et al.  OT-interactions between Focus and Canonical Word order: Deriving the Crosslinguistic Typology of Structural Contrastive Focus* , 1998 .

[56]  Vivienne Fong,et al.  The Partitive Constraint in Optimality Theory , 2000, J. Semant..

[57]  Gert Webelhuth,et al.  Syntactic saturation phenomena and the modern Germanic languages , 1989 .

[58]  James Lorin Mondloch,et al.  Voice in Quiché-Maya , 1981 .

[59]  Smita Joshi,et al.  Selection of grammatical and logical functions in Marathi , 1993 .

[60]  Helen Dehoop,et al.  Case Configuration and Noun Phrase Interpretation , 1996 .

[61]  Young-mee Yu Cho,et al.  A lexical account of inflectional suffixes in Korean , 1995 .

[62]  Catherine Rudin,et al.  Aspects of Bulgarian Syntax: Complementizers and WH Constructions , 1987 .

[63]  Anoop Mahajan,et al.  The A/A-bar distinction and movement theory , 1990 .

[64]  P. Boersma.  How we learn variation, optionality and probalility , 1997 .

[65]  Roman Jakobson,et al.  Implications of Language Universals for Linguistics , 1971 .

[66]  Anna Siewierska,et al.  Word order rules , 1988 .

[67]  Jeroen van de Weijer,et al.  Optimality theory : phonology, syntax, and acquisition , 2000 .

[68]  T. Mohanan.  Argument structure in Hindi , 1994 .

[69]  João Costa,et al.  Word order variation : a constrained-based approach , 1998 .

[70]  Enric Vallduví,et al.  The Informational Component , 1990 .

[71]  J. Grimshaw.  Projection, heads, and optimality , 1997 .

[72]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Lectures on Government and Binding , 1981 .

[73]  Judith Aissen,et al.  Differential Object Marking: Iconicity vs. Economy , 2003 .

[74]  P. Smolensky.  On the comprehension/production dilemma in child language , 1996 .