Graded pairs comparison - does strength of preference matter? Analysis of preferences for specialised nurse home visits for pain management.

In the stated preference method called graded pairs comparisons respondents are asked to rate the intensity of their preference for their preferred alternative in a pairwise comparison of alternatives. Econometricians anticipate that the additional information will improve statistical efficiency compared to the standard DCE format. However, this paper reveals that added information inherent in graded pairs scale does not provide smaller standard deviations for the WTP estimated. Secondly, the ordered-response regression models employing the full range of the graded pairs data tend to overestimate WTP, which presumably is caused by the inherent tendency of the ordered-response models to 'predict to the extremes'.

[1]  D. Wittink,et al.  Commercial Use of Conjoint Analysis: A Survey , 1982 .

[2]  John Mackenzie,et al.  A Comparison of Contingent Preference Models , 1993 .

[3]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  What If Consumer Experiments Impact Variances as Well as Means? Response Variability as a Behavioral Phenomenon , 2001 .

[4]  Joel Huber,et al.  The Effectiveness of Alternative Preference Elicitation Procedures in Predicting Choice , 1993 .

[5]  Mandy Ryan,et al.  Using discrete choice experiments to value health care programmes: current practice and future research reflections. , 2003, Applied health economics and health policy.

[6]  André de Palma,et al.  Rational Choice under an Imperfect Ability to Choose , 1994 .

[7]  F. Johnson,et al.  Willingness to pay for improved respiratory and cardiovascular health: a multiple-format, stated-preference approach. , 2000, Health economics.

[8]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  An Empirical Comparison of Ratings-Based and Choice-Based Conjoint Models , 1992 .

[9]  J. Loomis,et al.  Improving Statistical Efficiency and Testing Robustness of Conjoint Marginal Valuations , 2001 .

[10]  Stephen K. Swallow,et al.  Asymmetries in Ordered Strength of Preference Models: Implications of Focus Shift for Discrete-Choice Preference Estimation , 1999 .

[11]  Jeffrey M. Wooldridge,et al.  Solutions Manual and Supplementary Materials for Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data , 2003 .

[12]  Ulf Böckenholt,et al.  Modeling within-subject dependencies in ordinal paired comparison data , 1997 .

[13]  Philippe Cattin,et al.  Commercial Use of Conjoint Analysis: An Update , 1989 .

[14]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  The Effect of Attribute Variation on Consumer Choice Consistency , 1999 .

[15]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  An exploratory analysis of the effect of numbers of choice sets in designed choice experiments: an airline choice application , 2001 .

[16]  John B. Loomis,et al.  Applying a Method of Paired Comparisons to Measure Economic Values for Multiple Goods Sets , 2002, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics.

[17]  William H. Desvousges,et al.  Estimating Stated Preferences with Rated-Pair Data: Environmental, Health, and Employment Effects of Energy Programs , 1997 .

[18]  J. Swait,et al.  The Influence of Task Complexity on Consumer Choice: A Latent Class Model of Decision Strategy Switching , 2001 .

[19]  Marisa J. Mazzotta,et al.  Decision Making When Choices Are Complex: A Test of Heiner's Hypothesis , 1995 .

[20]  Joffre Swait,et al.  Choice Environment, Market Complexity, and Consumer Behavior: A Theoretical and Empirical Approach for Incorporating Decision Complexity into Models of Consumer Choice , 2001 .

[21]  Robert Kohn,et al.  Dissecting the Random Component of Utility , 2002 .

[22]  Kevin J. Boyle,et al.  Using Conjoint Analysis to Derive Estimates of Compensating Variation , 1996 .

[23]  James J. Opaluch,et al.  Strength-of-Preference Indicators and an Ordered-Response Model for Ordinarily Dichotomous, Discrete Choice Data , 2001 .