Conserved quantities in parity-time symmetric systems

Conserved quantities such as energy or the electric charge of a closed system, or the Runge-Lenz vector in Kepler dynamics are determined by its global, local, or accidental symmetries. They were instrumental to advances such as the prediction of neutrinos in the (inverse) beta decay process and the development of self-consistent approximate methods for isolated or thermal many-body systems. In contrast, little is known about conservation laws and their consequences in open systems. Recently, a special class of these systems, called parity-time ($\mathcal{PT}$) symmetric systems, has been intensely explored for their remarkable properties that are absent in their closed counterparts. A complete characterization and observation of conserved quantities in these systems and their consequences is still lacking. Here we present a complete set of conserved observables for a broad class of $\mathcal{PT}$-symmetric Hamiltonians and experimentally demonstrate their properties using single-photon linear optical circuit. By simulating the dynamics of a four-site system across a fourth-order exceptional point, we measure its four conserved quantities and demonstrate their consequences. Our results spell out non-local conservation laws in non-unitary dynamics and provide key elements that will underpin self-consistent analysis of non-Hermitian quantum many-body systems that are forthcoming.

[1]  Kunkun Wang,et al.  Simulating Dynamic Quantum Phase Transitions in Photonic Quantum Walks. , 2018, Physical review letters.

[2]  Kunkun Wang,et al.  Non-Hermitian bulk–boundary correspondence in quantum dynamics , 2019, Nature Physics.

[3]  U. Schollwoeck.  The density-matrix renormalization group , 2004, cond-mat/0409292.

[4]  Andrew K. Harter,et al.  Time-invariant PT product and phase locking in PT -symmetric lattice models , 2018, 1801.04918.

[5]  Shanhui Fan,et al.  Parity–time-symmetric whispering-gallery microcavities , 2013, Nature Physics.

[6]  M. Segev,et al.  Observation of parity–time symmetry in optics , 2010 .

[7]  Dorje C Brody,et al.  Complex extension of quantum mechanics. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[8]  A. Szameit,et al.  Light transport in PT-invariant photonic structures with hidden symmetries , 2014, 1408.1561.

[9]  U. Peschel,et al.  Parity–time synthetic photonic lattices , 2012, Nature.

[10]  Yogesh N. Joglekar,et al.  Observation of parity-time symmetry breaking transitions in a dissipative Floquet system of ultracold atoms , 2016, Nature Communications.

[11]  Roman Orus,et al.  A Practical Introduction to Tensor Networks: Matrix Product States and Projected Entangled Pair States , 2013, 1306.2164.

[12]  H. Korsch,et al.  A non-Hermitian symmetric Bose–Hubbard model: eigenvalue rings from unfolding higher-order exceptional points , 2008, 0802.3164.

[13]  P. Xue,et al.  Detecting topological invariants and revealing topological phase transitions in discrete-time photonic quantum walks , 2018, Physical Review A.

[14]  M Segev,et al.  Topologically protected bound states in photonic parity-time-symmetric crystals. , 2017, Nature materials.

[15]  E. M. Lifshitz,et al.  Classical theory of fields , 1952 .

[16]  A. Mostafazadeh.  Pseudo-Hermiticity versus PT symmetry: The necessary condition for the reality of the spectrum of a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian , 2001, math-ph/0107001.

[17]  Xing Rong,et al.  Observation of parity-time symmetry breaking in a single-spin system , 2018, Science.

[18]  H Neven,et al.  A blueprint for demonstrating quantum supremacy with superconducting qubits , 2017, Science.

[19]  Lan Yang,et al.  Exceptional points enhance sensing in an optical microcavity , 2017, Nature.

[20]  G. Mahan.  Many-particle physics , 1981 .

[21]  Barry C Sanders,et al.  Observation of emergent momentum–time skyrmions in parity–time-symmetric non-unitary quench dynamics , 2018, Nature Communications.

[22]  D. Christodoulides,et al.  Parity-time–symmetric microring lasers , 2014, Science.

[23]  Barry C. Sanders,et al.  Observation of topological edge states in parity–time-symmetric quantum walks , 2017, Nature Physics.

[24]  Shanhui Fan,et al.  Robust wireless power transfer using a nonlinear parity–time-symmetric circuit , 2017, Nature.

[25]  Seok Ho Song,et al.  Observation of an anti-PT-symmetric exceptional point and energy-difference conserving dynamics in electrical circuit resonators , 2018, Nature Communications.

[26]  Barry C. Sanders,et al.  Higher winding number in a nonunitary photonic quantum walk , 2018, Physical Review A.

[27]  Y. Wang,et al.  Single-mode laser by parity-time symmetry breaking , 2014, Science.

[28]  P. Rabl,et al.  Dynamically encircling exceptional points in a waveguide: asymmetric mode switching from the breakdown of adiabaticity , 2016, 1603.02325.

[29]  Demetrios N. Christodoulides,et al.  Non-Hermitian physics and PT symmetry , 2018, Nature Physics.

[30]  Yogesh N. Joglekar,et al.  Quantum state tomography across the exceptional point in a single dissipative qubit , 2019, Nature Physics.

[31]  Martin B. Plenio,et al.  A large-scale quantum simulator on a diamond surface at room temperature , 2012, Nature Physics.

[32]  R. Needs,et al.  Quantum Monte Carlo simulations of solids , 2001 .

[33]  Yogesh N. Joglekar,et al.  Optical waveguide arrays: quantum effects and PT symmetry breaking , 2013, 1305.3565.

[34]  Kunkun Wang,et al.  Observation of Critical Phenomena in Parity-Time-Symmetric Quantum Dynamics. , 2018, Physical review letters.

[35]  Ali Mostafazadeh,et al.  Pseudo-Hermitian Representation of Quantum Mechanics , 2008, 0810.5643.

[36]  Demetrios N. Christodoulides,et al.  Enhanced sensitivity at higher-order exceptional points , 2017, Nature.

[37]  Leo P. Kadanoff,et al.  CONSERVATION LAWS AND CORRELATION FUNCTIONS , 1961 .

[38]  P. Xue,et al.  Detecting Topological Invariants in Nonunitary Discrete-Time Quantum Walks. , 2017, Physical review letters.