To tree, or not to tree? On the Empirical Basis for Having Past Landscapes to Experience.

This article provides an overview of some of the complex issues involved in reconstructing and visualizing past landscapes. It discusses the importance of empirical data and introduces some of the terminology necessary for understanding methods which are often considered more in the domain of the natural sciences than humanities. Current methods and practices are put in the context of environmental archaeology, archaeological theory and heritage management as well as related, briefly, to the broader context of archaeological theory, practice and research data infrastructure. Finally, some examples and pointers for the future are given in the hope that the article may provide a point of reference for those looking to gain an entry point into the study of past landscapes, and understand their relevance in archaeological visualisation. Aims Our intention with this point of view paper is to help refocus an increasingly abstract and theoretically orientated Digital Humanities (DH). We will present a critical perspective on some of the problems and potentials relating to the visualisation of past (primarily non-urban) landscapes, with particular emphasis on the use of empirical evidence, from a combined environmental and archaeological point of view. We will outline some of the major challenges associated with reconstructing past landscapes from data, and give some examples of recent attempts to create platforms for addressing some of these issues. We will also briefly discuss the importance of landscape visualisation in the context of heritage management.

[1]  Matthew H. Johnson Thinking landscape , 2023 .

[2]  Gill Campbell Environmental Archaeology , 2018, The Encyclopedia of Archaeological Sciences.

[3]  T. Dawson,et al.  Climate change and the deteriorating archaeological and environmental archives of the Arctic , 2018, Antiquity.

[4]  Andrew W. Howard,et al.  Deposit Modelling and Archaeology , 2018 .

[5]  Philip I. Buckland,et al.  Caught in a trap: landscape and climate implications of the insect fauna from a Roman well in Sherwood Forest , 2018, Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences.

[6]  Philip I. Buckland,et al.  The Neotoma Paleoecology Database, a multiproxy, international, community-curated data resource , 2018, Quaternary Research.

[7]  T. Darvill Heritage Landscape Sites. An Introduction to the Work of the Group of Experts , 2015 .

[8]  Helene Wilhelmson,et al.  Virtual taphonomy: A new method integrating excavation and postprocessing in an archaeological context. , 2015, American journal of physical anthropology.

[9]  I. Hodder,et al.  Revisiting reflexive archaeology at Çatalhöyük: integrating digital and 3D technologies at the trowel's edge , 2015, Antiquity.

[10]  Simon Goring,et al.  neotoma: A Programmatic Interface to the Neotoma Paleoecological Database , 2015 .

[11]  Marco Callieri,et al.  Experiencing Ancient Buildings from a 3D GIS Perspective: a Case Drawn from the Swedish Pompeii Project , 2015, Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory.

[12]  Philip I. Buckland The Bugs Coleopteran Ecology Package (BugsCEP) database : 1000 sites and half a million fossils later , 2014 .

[13]  W. Steffen,et al.  Anthropogenic climate change and the nature of Earth System science , 2014 .

[14]  Maurizio Forte,et al.  3D Archaeology: New Perspectives and Challenges—The Example of Çatalhöyük , 2014 .

[15]  Paul J. Crutzen,et al.  The Palaeoanthropocene – The beginnings of anthropogenic environmental change , 2013 .

[16]  Marco Callieri,et al.  Digital reconstruction and visualization in archaeology: Case-study drawn from the work of the Swedish Pompeii Project , 2013, 2013 Digital Heritage International Congress (DigitalHeritage).

[17]  Peter Der Manuelian Giza 3D: Digital archaeology and scholarly access to the Giza Pyramids: The Giza Project at Harvard University , 2013, 2013 Digital Heritage International Congress (DigitalHeritage).

[18]  Marco Di Ioia,et al.  The Virtual Museum of the Tiber Valley Project , 2012 .

[19]  Maurizio Forte,et al.  3D Archaeology at Çatalhöyük , 2012 .

[20]  Roberto Scopigno,et al.  Archeological excavation monitoring using dense stereo matching techniques , 2012 .

[21]  Fabio Remondino,et al.  QUERYARCH3D: QUERYING AND VISUALISING 3D MODELS OF A MAYA ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE IN A WEB-BASED INTERFACE , 2011 .

[22]  Philip I. Buckland SEAD - The Strategic Environmental Archaeology Database. Inter-linking multiproxy environmental data with archaeological investigations and ecology. , 2011 .

[23]  Roberto Scopigno,et al.  Documentation and Interpretation of an Archeological Excavation: an Experience with Dense Stereo Reconstruction Tools , 2011, VAST.

[24]  N. Whitehouse,et al.  How fragmented was the British Holocene wildwood? Perspectives on the “Vera” grazing debate from the fossil beetle record , 2010 .

[25]  H. Blankholm Long-Term Research and Cultural Resource Management Strategies in Light of Climate Change and Human Impact , 2009, ARCTIC ANTHROPOLOGY.

[26]  J. Barrett,et al.  A phenomenology of landscape , 2009 .

[27]  M. J. Bunting,et al.  Equifinality and uncertainty in the interpretation of pollen data: the Multiple Scenario Approach to reconstruction of past vegetation mosaics , 2009 .

[28]  J. Bullock,et al.  Can the pre-Neolithic provide suitable models for re-wilding the landscape in Britain? , 2009 .

[29]  H. Hyvärinen Reconstructing Quaternary environments , 2008 .

[30]  S. Sugita,et al.  Theory of quantitative reconstruction of vegetation II: all you need is LOVE , 2007 .

[31]  Matthew H. Johnson On the nature of theoretical archaeology and archaeological theory , 2006, Archaeological Dialogues.

[32]  Richard Bradley,et al.  Bridging the Two Cultures – Commercial Archaeology and the Study of Prehistoric Britain , 2006, The Antiquaries Journal.

[33]  F. Mitchell How open were European primeval forests? Hypothesis testing using palaeoecological data , 2005 .

[34]  J. Evans Environmental Archaeology and the Social Order , 2003 .

[35]  J. Lawesson Grazing Ecology and Forest History , 2003 .

[36]  Daniel Pletinckx,et al.  Virtual-Reality Heritage Presentation at Ename , 2000, IEEE Multim..

[37]  T. Ingold The temporality of the landscape , 1993, The Perception of the Environment.

[38]  I. Simmons,et al.  Interpreting Nature: Cultural Constructions of the Environment , 1993 .

[39]  S. Piggott,et al.  A History of Archaeological Thought , 1991 .

[40]  George E. P. Box,et al.  Empirical Model‐Building and Response Surfaces , 1988 .

[41]  M. Watson LANDSCAPES OF FEAR , 1982 .

[42]  Y. Tuan,et al.  Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience. , 1978 .

[43]  Lewis R. Binford,et al.  A Consideration of Archaeological Research Design , 1964, American Antiquity.

[44]  Council , 1954, The Aeronautical Journal (1968).

[45]  D. Massey Landscape as a provocation: reflections on moving mountains , 2020 .

[46]  Tyler D. Johnson,et al.  Interpretation at the Controller’s Edge: Designing Graphical User Interfaces for the Digital Publication of the Excavations at Gabii (Italy) , 2016 .

[47]  Timothy A. Kohler,et al.  Cultural Dynamics, Deep Time, and Data Planning Cyberinfrastructure Investments for Archaeology , 2015 .

[48]  Thomas Nygren,et al.  The status quo of digital humanities in Sweden : past, present and future of digital history , 2014 .

[49]  Sara L. Gonzalez,et al.  An Anthropocene Without Archaeology—Should We Care? , 2014 .

[50]  R. Banerjee,et al.  Foreword , 2011, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A.

[51]  B. Pedroli,et al.  Landscape in a Changing World; Bridging Divides, Integrating Disciplines, Serving Society , 2010 .

[52]  Keir Reeves,et al.  Introduction : remembering places of pain and shame , 2009 .

[53]  Session title: “ARE WE THERE YET?” ARCHAEOLOGISTS AND THE EUROPEAN LANDSCAPE CONVENTION , 2008 .

[54]  G. Fairclough,et al.  Common Culture: The Archaeology of Landscape Character in Europe , 2007 .

[55]  Philip I. Buckland,et al.  Palaeoecological evidence for the Vera hypothesis , 2005 .

[56]  G. Fairclough ‘The Long Chain’: Archaeology, Historical Landscape Characterization and Time Depth in the Landscape , 2003 .

[57]  L. A. Beck Regional approaches to mortuary analysis , 1995 .

[58]  C. Chippindale Archaeological theory: who sets the agenda?: Ambition, deference, discrepancy, consumption: the intellectual background to a post–processual archaeology , 1993 .

[59]  Paul Reilly,et al.  Towards a virtual archaeology , 1990 .