How language production shapes language form and comprehension
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] S. Suter. Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children , 2005, European Journal of Pediatrics.
[2] M. MacDonald,et al. Pragmatic constraint on the interpretation of complex noun phrases in Spanish and English. , 1999 .
[3] George A. Miller,et al. Introduction to the Formal Analysis of Natural Languages , 1968 .
[4] E. Newport,et al. Science Current Directions in Psychological Statistical Learning : from Acquiring Specific Items to Forming General Rules on Behalf Of: Association for Psychological Science , 2022 .
[5] P. O'Seaghdha,et al. Phrasal Ordering Constraints in Sentence Production: Phrase Length and Verb Disposition in Heavy-NP Shift , 1998 .
[6] Thomas Wasow,et al. Remarks on grammatical weight , 1997, Language Variation and Change.
[7] J. K. Bock,et al. Conceptual accessibility and syntactic structure in sentence formulation , 1985, Cognition.
[8] Edward A Wasserman,et al. Pigeons and people select efficient routes when solving a one-way "traveling salesperson" task. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.
[9] R. M. Warren,et al. Phonemic restorations based on subsequent context , 1974 .
[10] L Frazier,et al. Constraint satisfaction as a theory of sentence processing , 1995, Journal of psycholinguistic research.
[11] Elissa L. Newport,et al. The Role of Stress and Position in Determining First Words , 1992 .
[12] Jane E Raymond,et al. Learned Predictiveness Speeds Visual Processing , 2012, Psychological science.
[13] Christoph Scheepers,et al. Referential and Visual Cues to Structural Choice in Visually Situated Sentence Production , 2012, Front. Psychology.
[14] V. Ferreira,et al. The functions of structural priming , 2006, Language and cognitive processes.
[15] Steven T. Piantadosi,et al. The communicative function of ambiguity in language , 2011, Cognition.
[16] David Lightfoot,et al. The development of language , 1999 .
[17] P. Smolensky,et al. Learning biases predict a word order universal , 2012, Cognition.
[18] C. Van Petten,et al. Prediction during language comprehension: benefits, costs, and ERP components. , 2012, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.
[19] Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al. Probabilistic constraints and syntactic ambiguity resolution , 1994 .
[20] Rick Dale,et al. Listeners invest in an assumed other’s perspective despite cognitive cost , 2011, Cognition.
[21] M. Pickering,et al. Do people use language production to make predictions during comprehension? , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[22] John Hale,et al. Uncertainty About the Rest of the Sentence , 2006, Cogn. Sci..
[23] Mark S. Seidenberg. Connectionist Models in Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience : Critical Periods and the Paradox of Success , 2005 .
[24] M. Pickering,et al. Conceptual influences on word order and voice in sentence production: Evidence from Japanese , 2011 .
[25] G. Dell,et al. Effect of Ambiguity and Lexical Availability on Syntactic and Lexical Production , 2000, Cognitive Psychology.
[26] C M Connine,et al. Interactive use of lexical information in speech perception. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[27] E. Newport,et al. When learners surpass their models: The acquisition of American Sign Language from inconsistent input , 2004, Cognitive Psychology.
[28] W. Chafe. Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view , 1976 .
[29] M. Tarr,et al. FFA: a flexible fusiform area for subordinate-level visual processing automatized by expertise , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.
[30] Victor Kuperman,et al. of construction probability on word durations during spontaneous incremental sentence production , 2012 .
[31] S. Levinson,et al. The myth of language universals: language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. , 2009, The Behavioral and brain sciences.
[32] D. Jin. Generating variable birdsong syllable sequences with branching chain networks in avian premotor nucleus HVC. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.
[33] Michael Ramscar,et al. Linguistic Self-Correction in the Absence of Feedback: A New Approach to the Logical Problem of Language Acquisition , 2007, Cogn. Sci..
[34] Mark C. Smith,et al. Horizontal information flow in spoken sentence production. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[35] Morten H. Christiansen,et al. Experience and sentence processing: Statistical learning and relative clause comprehension , 2009, Cognitive Psychology.
[36] D. Plaut,et al. Doing without schema hierarchies: a recurrent connectionist approach to normal and impaired routine sequential action. , 2004, Psychological review.
[37] G. Hickok,et al. Recency preference in the human sentence processing mechanism , 1996, Cognition.
[38] Jeffrey D. Karpicke. Retrieval-Based Learning , 2012 .
[39] F. Ferreira,et al. How incremental is language production? Evidence from the production of utterances requiring the computation of arithmetic sums , 2002 .
[40] Lyn Frazier,et al. (Not) Hearing Optional Subjects: The Effects of Pragmatic Usage Preferences. , 2012, Journal of memory and language.
[41] A. J. Hull,et al. INFORMATION, ACOUSTIC CONFUSION AND MEMORY SPAN. , 1964, British journal of psychology.
[42] D. Slobin,et al. The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition , 2000 .
[43] T. Givón,et al. Function, structure, and language acquisition. , 1985 .
[44] T. Shallice,et al. CONTENTION SCHEDULING AND THE CONTROL OF ROUTINE ACTIVITIES , 2000, Cognitive neuropsychology.
[45] Nick Chater,et al. Finite models of infinite language: A connectionist approach to recursion , 2001 .
[46] J. Bresnan,et al. Predicting syntax: Processing dative constructions in American and Australian varieties of English , 2010 .
[47] G. Dell,et al. Language production and serial order: a functional analysis and a model. , 1997, Psychological review.
[48] T Florian Jaeger,et al. On language 'utility': processing complexity and communicative efficiency. , 2011, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.
[49] T. Hartley,et al. A Linguistically Constrained Model of Short-Term Memory for Nonwords ☆ , 1996 .
[50] P. Frasconi,et al. Learning first-pass structural attachment preferences with dynamic grammars and recursive neural networks , 2003, Cognition.
[51] G. Dell,et al. Becoming syntactic. , 2006, Psychological review.
[52] H E Wanner,et al. An ATN approach to comprehension , 1978 .
[53] R. Jackendoff. Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution , 2002 .
[54] Thomas A. Farmer,et al. Early Occipital Sensitivity to Syntactic Category Is Based on Form Typicality , 2010, Psychological science.
[55] Daniel J. Acheson,et al. Verbal working memory and language production: Common approaches to the serial ordering of verbal information. , 2009, Psychological bulletin.
[56] E. Kaiser. Taking Action: A Cross-Modal Investigation of Discourse-Level Representations , 2012, Front. Psychology.
[57] S. Kirby,et al. Language evolution in the laboratory , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[58] Nelson Cowan,et al. Working Memory Capacity , 2005 .
[59] Kathryn Bock,et al. Reversing the hands of time: changing the mapping from seeing to saying. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[60] G. A. Miller. THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .
[61] F. Newmeyer. Language Form And Language Function , 1998 .
[62] Janet Dean Fodor,et al. The diagnosis and cure of garden paths , 1994 .
[63] Gustavo Deco,et al. Sequential Memory: A Putative Neural and Synaptic Dynamical Mechanism , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[64] Gerhard Jäger,et al. Priming and unidirectional language change , 2008 .
[65] Eugene Galanter,et al. Handbook of mathematical psychology: I. , 1963 .
[66] M. MacDonald. Distributional Information in Language Comprehension, Production, and Acquisition: Three Puzzles and a Moral , 2013 .
[67] Z. Harris,et al. Foundations of language , 1941 .
[68] Joseph Paul Stemberger,et al. Speech errors in early child language production , 1989 .
[69] A. Samuel,et al. First Impressions and Last Resorts , 2008, Psychological science.
[70] Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al. The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution , 1994 .
[71] Harald Clahsen,et al. How children process over-regularizations: Evidence from event-related brain potentials* , 2007, Journal of Child Language.
[72] Morten H. Christiansen,et al. Reassessing working memory: comment on Just and Carpenter (1992) and Waters and Caplan (1996). , 2002, Psychological review.
[73] W. Labov,et al. Constraints on the agentless passive , 1983, Journal of Linguistics.
[74] Kathryn Bock,et al. Toward a Cognitive Psychology of Syntax: Information Processing Contributions to Sentence Formulation , 1982 .
[75] M. MacDonald,et al. Word Order Doesn't Matter: Relative Clause Production in English and Japanese , 2009 .
[76] Raymond J. Mooney,et al. Induction of First-Order Decision Lists: Results on Learning the Past Tense of English Verbs , 1995, J. Artif. Intell. Res..
[77] James L. McClelland,et al. Alternatives to the combinatorial paradigm of linguistic theory based on domain general principles of human cognition , 2005 .
[78] Steven C Dakin,et al. An oblique effect for local motion: psychophysics and natural movie statistics. , 2005, Journal of vision.
[79] Alexandra A. Cleland,et al. Syntactic priming in written production: Evidence for rapid decay , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[80] Marc Brysbaert,et al. Challenges to recent theories of cross-linguistic differences in parsing: Evidence from Dutch. In D. Hillert (Ed.), Sentence processing: A cross-linguistic perspective. CA: Academic Press, San Diego, 1998. , 1998 .
[81] J. Hawkins. Efficiency and complexity in grammars , 2004 .
[82] V. Ferrera. Task-dependent modulation of the sensorimotor transformation for smooth pursuit eye movements. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.
[83] B. Keysar,et al. When do speakers take into account common ground? , 1996, Cognition.
[84] R. Harald Baayen,et al. Predicting the dative alternation , 2007 .
[85] Kevin Diependaele,et al. How lingering representations of abandoned context words affect speech production. , 2012, Acta psychologica.
[86] Evan Kidd,et al. The acquisition of relative clauses: Processing, typology and function , 2011 .
[87] A. Goldberg. Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language , 2006 .
[88] Susan Kemper,et al. Tracking Talking: Dual Task Costs of Planning and Producing Speech for Young versus Older Adults , 2011, Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition.
[89] Jon Andoni Duñabeitia,et al. Subject relative clauses are not universally easier to process: Evidence from Basque , 2010, Cognition.
[90] Charles Chien-Jer Lin,et al. The Processing Foundation of Head-Final Relative Clauses , 2008 .
[91] J R Anderson,et al. Retrieval of information from long-term memory. , 1983, Science.
[92] Alan Garnham,et al. Late Closure in Context , 1998 .
[93] James L. McClelland,et al. Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations , 1986 .
[94] F. Ferreira,et al. Conceptual accessibility and sentence production in a free word order language (Odawa) , 2005, Cognition.
[95] Robin K. Morris,et al. Processing Subject and Object Relative Clauses: Evidence from Eye Movements , 2002 .
[96] F. Ferreira. Choice of Passive Voice is Affected by Verb Type and Animacy , 1994 .
[97] Stephen Grossberg,et al. A Theory of Human Memory: Self-Organization and Performance of Sensory-Motor Codes, Maps, and Plans , 1982 .
[98] F. Chang,et al. “Long before short” preference in the production of a head-final language , 2001, Cognition.
[99] M. Tanenhaus,et al. Accent and reference resolution in spoken-language comprehension , 2002 .
[100] Jean E. Fox Tree,et al. Pronouncing “the” as “thee” to signal problems in speaking , 1997, Cognition.
[101] Morten H. Christiansen,et al. Word chunk frequencies affect the processing of pronominal object-relative clauses , 2007, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[102] Silvia P. Gennari,et al. Semantic indeterminacy in object relative clauses. , 2008, Journal of memory and language.
[103] Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al. Linking production and comprehension processes: The case of relative clauses , 2009, Cognition.
[104] K. Lashley. The problem of serial order in behavior , 1951 .
[105] M. Botvinick,et al. Abstract Structural Representations of Goal-Directed Behavior , 2010, Psychological science.
[106] Richard Hudson,et al. The difficulty of (so-called) self-embedded structures * , 1996 .
[107] Rebecca J. Panagos. Meaningful Differences in the Everyday Experience of Young American Children , 1998 .
[108] Dylan M. Jones,et al. Linguistic familiarity in short-term memory: A role for (co-)articulatory fluency? , 2008 .
[109] Steven A. Jax,et al. The problem of serial order in behavior: Lashley's legacy. , 2007, Human movement science.
[110] Joan L. Bybee,et al. From Usage to Grammar: The Mind's Response to Repetition , 2007 .
[111] E. Newport,et al. Getting it right by getting it wrong: When learners change languages , 2009, Cognitive Psychology.
[112] Maria Babyonyshev,et al. The Complexity of Nested Structures in Japanese. , 1999 .
[113] P. MacNeilage,et al. On the origin of internal structure of word forms. , 2000, Science.
[114] Willem J. M. Levelt,et al. Linearization in Describing Spatial Networks , 1982 .
[115] Kazuo Fujita,et al. Flexible route selection by pigeons (Columba livia) on a computerized multi-goal navigation task with and without an "obstacle". , 2011, Journal of comparative psychology.
[116] Maryellen C MacDonald,et al. When language comprehension reflects production constraints: Resolving ambiguities with the help of past experience , 2009, Memory & cognition.
[117] J. Kimball. Seven principles of surface structure parsing in natural language , 1973 .
[118] Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al. Constraint Satisfaction Accounts of Lexical and Sentence Comprehension , 2006 .
[119] B. Postle. Working memory as an emergent property of the mind and brain , 2006, Neuroscience.
[120] Silvia P. Gennari,et al. Animacy and competition in relative clause production: A cross-linguistic investigation , 2012, Cognitive Psychology.
[121] F P Roth,et al. Accelerating language learning in young children , 1984, Journal of Child Language.
[122] William O’Grady,et al. Relative clauses Processing and acquisition * , 2011 .
[123] F. Ferreira. Effects of length and syntactic complexity on initiation times for prepared utterances , 1991 .
[124] R. Jackendoff. Linguistics in Cognitive Science: The state of the art , 2007 .
[125] E. Gibson. Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies , 1998, Cognition.
[126] Jeanette Altarriba,et al. The effect of semantic relatedness on immediate serial recall and serial recognition , 2011, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[127] Franklin Chang,et al. Learning to order words: A connectionist model of heavy NP shift and accessibility effects in Japanese and English , 2009 .
[128] Edward Gibson,et al. Consequences of the Serial Nature of Linguistic Input for Sentenial Complexity , 2005, Cogn. Sci..
[129] Yiya Chen,et al. Let’s you do that: Sharing the cognitive burdens of dialogue , 2007 .
[130] Lyn Frazier,et al. Sentence processing: A tutorial review. , 1987 .
[131] D. Lightfoot. The development of language , 1999 .
[132] D. Sternad,et al. Decomposition of variability in the execution of goal-oriented tasks: three components of skill improvement. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[133] G. A. Miller,et al. Finitary models of language users , 1963 .
[134] Mark S. Seidenberg,et al. The emergence of grammaticality in connectionist networks. , 1999 .
[135] Ariel Rokem,et al. A model of encoding and decoding in V1 and MT accounts for motion perception anisotropies in the human visual system , 2009, Brain Research.
[136] R. Levy. Expectation-based syntactic comprehension , 2008, Cognition.
[137] G. A. Miller,et al. Verbal context and the recall of meaningful material. , 1950, The American journal of psychology.