Biomind — A new biology curriculum that enables authentic inquiry learning

In recent years, the science teaching community and curriculum developers have emphasised the importance of teaching inquiry and teaching science as inquiry. One way of developing learners' skills for planning and carrying out scientific research is by allowing them to perform independent research, guided by a teacher. It was recently discovered that there are considerable differences between experiments conducted by scientists and those conducted by students, with regard to the cognitive processes that the experimenters go through. Developing inquiry study activities that emphasise authentic inquiry was suggested in order to introduce students to cognitive activity that more closely resembles that of scientific professionals. This article describes the Biomind programme, intended for students of Grades 11 and 12 (ages 16 to 18 years) majoring in biology. The curriculum, developed by biology teachers, enables students to conduct independent research under teacher guidance. The curriculum emphasises the learning process, not just the outcome, and so students must reflect upon the work in progress. Moreover, the Biomind curriculum follows the principles of authentic inquiry. Biomind may improve students' scientific thinking abilities, expand the guidance aspect of teachers' work, and inspire curriculum developers to further emphasise inquiry.

[1]  Anne Goldsworthy,et al.  What Is Not Fair with Investigations , 1999 .

[2]  Ruth Stavy,et al.  Teaching science by inquiry: assessment and learning , 1998 .

[3]  L. Aho,et al.  Learning science by practical work in Finnish primary schools using materials familiar from the environment: a pilot study , 1993 .

[4]  Richard Lesh,et al.  Beyond Constructivism , 2003 .

[5]  P. Scott,et al.  Constructing Scientific Knowledge in the Classroom , 1994 .

[6]  Peter Caputi,et al.  Defining the Inquiry , 2001 .

[7]  Eva M. Ogens.  A Review of Science Education: Past Failures, Future Hopes. , 1991 .

[8]  Ron Good,et al.  Effects of cooperative grouping on stoichiometric problem solving in high school chemistry , 1990 .

[9]  R. Roberts.  Procedural understanding in biology: the ‘thinking behind the doing’ , 2001 .

[10]  Richard Gott,et al.  Practical work: its role in the understanding of evidence in science , 1996 .

[11]  Lisa Martin-Hansen,et al.  Defining Inquiry: Exploring the Many Types of Inquiry in the Science Classroom. , 2002 .

[12]  C. Chinn,et al.  Epistemologically Authentic Inquiry in Schools: A Theoretical Framework for Evaluating Inquiry Tasks , 2002 .

[13]  P. Tamir.  Assessment and Evaluation in Science Education: Opportunities to Learn and Outcomes , 1998 .

[14]  Patricia Friedrichsen.  Moving from Hands-On to Inquiry-Based: A Biology Course for Prospective Elementary Teachers , 2001 .

[15]  George E. DeBoer,et al.  A history of ideas in science education : implications for practice , 1992 .

[16]  Jian Ma.  Problem-based learning with database systems , 1994 .

[17]  J. Shea.  National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[18]  D. Hodson,et al.  Pedagogical context knowledge: Toward a fuller understanding of what good science teachers know , 2001 .